Cases

FIFTH DIVISION PHIPPS, P. J., DILLARD and PETERSON, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules June 10,

OPINION Marc. W. Brown, Justice Once again, this court considers whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying a motion in which appellants—the Branch Law Firm L.L.P. and Turner Branch—sought to compel appellee W. Shane Osborn to arbitrate his claims. The Branch Parties relied upon an arbitration clause in a settlement agreement among a pharmaceutical company, participating claimants, and participa

OPINION 1 J. BRETT BUSBY, Justice. These consolidated appeals arise out of a protracted dispute between Stewart and Marla Feldman and Tanglewood Homes Association, Inc. over the Feldmans’ desire to expand their home. When the Association rejected the Feldmans’ expansion plans as a violation of the Tangl

Dillard, Judge. Marcus Somerville, who successfully sued Wanda White for breach of contract, appeals the trial court’s judgment in White’s favor as to one of her counterclaims, which sought damages for a “violation of Georgia penal laws.” Specifically, the trial court awarded $500 in compensatory damages and $15,000 in punitive damages to White because it found that Somerville violated OCGA § 16-11-90, a statute that criminali

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RONDA L. DAVIS, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 10-1564 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 184, 185

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 2, 2004 Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 2, 2004. In The

530 F.Supp. 654 (1982) Raymond & Marjorie NELLIGAN, Steven L. & Helen G. Kish, Marvin & Margaret Bullion, Vincent & Cecile Schikora, Albert W. & Wanda J. Chamberlin, Robert K. & Elizabeth Tilley, Arthur & Helen Cull, Robert E. & Mary Furby, Patrick Gainer, Howard L. & Lenore Hicks, Bernard & June Stephenson, Charles H. & Fay J. Taylor, Joseph C. & Veda M. LaCelle, Plaintiffs, v. JOHNS-MANVILLE SALES

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER B. LYNN WINMILL, Chief Judge. INTRODUCTION The Court has before it motions for summary judgment filed by the defendants. The Court heard oral argument on June 7, 2011, and took the motions under advisement. For the reasons explained below, the Court will grant the motions in part, dismissing the claims for (1) intentional infliction of emotional distre

#30048-a-JMK 2023 S.D. 67 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA **** STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MATTHEW ALLAN CARTER, Defendant and Appellant. **** APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT

564 S.E.2d 742 (2002) 254 Ga. App. 826 CLARK v. BYRD. Allstate Indemnity Company et al. v. Clark. Nestlehutt v. Clark. Nos. A01A2422, A01A2423, A01A2424. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 28, 2002. Reconsideration Denied April 10, 2002. *743 Kenneth C. Pollock, Atl

7 F.3d 1097 GOVERNMENT OF the VIRGIN ISLANDSv.Luis PARRILLA, Appellant. No. 92-7046. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Argued Dec. 10, 1992.Decided Oct. 12, 1993. Terry M. Halpern, U.S. Atty., Wanda K. Robinson, Asst. U.S. Atty. and Carl F. Morey, (argued), Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., Office of the U

RYAN, Circuit Judge, dissenting. The district court below granted summary judgment to defendants on the basis that plaintiffs, a class of retirees who were employed by Tecumseh Products Co., were “virtually represented” by a previous group of Tecumseh retirees against whom judgment as a matter of law was rendered in an identical action. Because the virtual representation strain of res judicata has unque

793 F.Supp. 1386 (1992) MAGNOLIA BAR ASSOCIATION, INC., Mississippi State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Rainbow Coalition, Mississippi Association of Black Supervisors, Mississippi Conference of Black Mayors, George Flaggs, Bennie Thompson, Sheila Johnson, and Sam McCray, on Behalf of Themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Roy Noble LEE, Dan M. Lee, Armis E. Hawkins, Lenore L.

797 F.Supp.2d 1029 (2011) Wanda COLLIER, Plaintiff, v. TURNER INDUSTRIES GROUP, L.L.C., a Louisiana limited liability company; David Eastridge; Nu-West Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation, d/b/a Agrium Conda Phosphate Industries, and Jack Daniell, an individual, Defendants. Case No. 4:CV 09-596-BLW. United States District Court, D. Idaho. June 22, 2011.

Opinion BROWN, J. A jury convicted defendant Jerry Grant Frye of two counts of first degree murder (Pen. Code, §187; all further statutory references are to *931this code unless noted otherwise), first degree robbery (§ 211), residential burglary (§ 459), and the unlawful driving and taking of a vehicle (Veh. Code, § 10851). The jury also found true the

OPINION AND ORDER AIDA M. DELGADO-COLON, Chief Judge. Plaintiffs, Gisselle Bermúdez-Rosa (“plaintiff’ or “Bermúdez”), José R. Conde-Ortíz (“Conde”), and their Conjugal Partnership (collectively, “plaintiffs”), bring suit against defendant, Kelly Services, Inc. (“Kelly” or “defendant”), alleging, inter alia, that she was discriminated against in her employment due to her sex and age. Be

661 F.3d 87 (2011) Courtney R. CARROLL, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES, et al., Defendants, Appellees. Board of Directors of the Rainforest Kids Child Development Center, et al., Defendants. No. 10-1152. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard March 10, 2011. Decided October 31, 2011.

65 B.R. 105 (1986) In the Matter of Jeffrey Earl BURDICK, Sr., Wanda Burdick f/d/b/a/ Busy B. Dairy Farms, Busy B. Farms, Debtors. J. Richard COFFING and Gladys Coffing, Plaintiffs, v. Jeffrey Earl BURDICK, Sr., and Wanda Burdick, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 81-31384, Adv. No. 82-3034. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division. September 2, 1986.

733 F.Supp. 1355 (1990) Vernon M. PUPPE, Deceased, by Wanda PUPPE, Surviving Spouse, and Candice Brouse and Deborah Lynn Puppe, Surviving Children, Plaintiffs, v. A.C. AND S., INC., et al., Defendants. Civ. No. A2-86-78. United States District Court, D. North Dakota, Northeastern Division. March 28, 1990. *1356 David Thompson, Fa

433 F.Supp.2d 172 (2006) In re NEURONTIN MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS Liability Litigation. This Document Relates to: Harden Manufacturing Corp., et al. v. Pfizer Inc. and Warner-Lambert Co. The Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America v. Pfizer Inc. and Aetna, Inc. v. Pfizer Inc. MDL No. 1629. Civil Action No. 04-10981-PBS. United States District Court, D. Massach