Cases

2023 IL 128338 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 128338) WILLIAM WALTON, Appellant, v. ROOSEVELT UNIVERSITY, Appellee. Opinion filed March 23, 2023. JUSTICE HOLDER WHITE delivered the judgment of the court, w

2022 IL App (1st) 210011 FIRST DISTRICT SECOND DIVISION February 22, 2022 No. 1-21-0011 WILLIAM WALTON, Individually and on ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of Behal

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2023 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 603 U. S. Part 1 Pages 369–479 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 28, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ONTARIO PROVINCIAL COUNCIL OF ) CARPENTERS’ PENSION TRUST FUND, ) POLICE & FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ) THE CITY OF DETROIT, AND NORFOLK ) COUNTY RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Derivatively ) on Behalf of WALMART INC., ) ) Plaintiffs,

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ONTARIO PROVINCIAL COUNCIL OF ) CARPENTERS’ PENSION TRUST FUND, ) POLICE & FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ) THE CITY OF DETROIT, AND NORFOLK ) COUNTY RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Derivatively ) on Behalf of WALMART INC., ) ) Plaintiffs,

724 F.Supp.2d 861 (2010) KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, U.S.A., INC., Plaintiff, v. ALLIED OFFICE PRODUCTS, INC. et al., Defendants. Case No. 2:06-cv-71. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. July 13, 2010. *864 Timothy G. Warner, Eric J. Weiss, Lori Ross Tark, Cavitch, Familo, Durkin & Frutkin Co., L

713 F.Supp.2d 56 (2010) INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, et al., Plaintiffs, v. M-K SIGNS, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 10-105(CKK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. May 25, 2010. Kent G. Cprek, Jennings Sigmond, P.C., Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiffs. MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 10-105 (CKK) v. M-K SIGNS, INC., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (May 25, 2010) This action is brought by P

OPINION OF THE COURT MANSMANN, Circuit Judge. In this diversity matter we are asked to examine the substantive tort law of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in order to determine the role of expert testimony and the so-called “fiber drift” theory in proving causation in cases of alleged asbestos-related injury. Because the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has not addressed the question before us, our task is to pre

CAMPBELL, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from a decision of the district court, 492 F.Supp. 334, denying plaintiff-appellant’s motion for a preliminary injunction and granting defendantsappellees’ motion to dismiss.1 The facts are much like those recently before this court in Walsh v. ILA, Local 799, 630 F.2d 864 (1st Cir. 1980). Allied International, Inc., is an

175 N.W.2d 110 (1970) STATE BOARD OF REGENTS, State of Iowa, Appellant, v. UNITED PACKING HOUSE FOOD AND ALLIED WORKERS, LOCAL NO. 1258 affiliated with the United Packing House Workers of America, AFL-CIO, John Walton, Individually, and as President of Said Association, Richard Kammeyer, Individually, and as Vice-President of Said Association, Kenneth Stock, Individually and as Recording Secretary of Said Association, and Raphe Bramblett, Individ

By the Court. Lumpkin, J., delivering the opinion. [1.] The first error complained of in the record, is the decision of the Court, admitting that portion of the testimony of Joseph Bush, which went to show that Alexander M. Urquhart was the guardian of Joseph Nunez, at the time of the donation by the latter to the former. The ajipointment

914 F.2d 360 59 USLW 2168, Prod.Liab.Rep.(CCH)P 12,567 ROBERTSON, Charles A. and Robertson, Era, H/W Rudolph, WayneR. and Rudolph, Elizabeth, H/W Grubb, John L. and Grubb,Marion L., H/W Stopfel, Larry C. and Stopfel, Mary Ann, H/WGincley, Ronald S. and Gincley, Lucille L., H/W Wertman,Winfred R. and Wertman, Charlotte, H/W Sgro, James A. andSgro, Carol, H/W Connelly, John J., Jr. and Connelly, Grace,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) CHANGJI ESQUEL TEXTILE CO. LTD., ) et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 21-1798 (RBW)

582 F.3d 244 (2009) The PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF SUDAN, Rev. Matthew Mathiang Deang, Rev. James Koung Ninrew, Nuer Community Development Services in U.S.A, Fatuma Nyawang Garbang, Nyot Tot Rieth, individually and on behalf of the estate of her husband Joseph Thiet Makuac, Stephen Hoth, Stephen Kuina, Chief Tunguar Kueigwong Rat, Luka Ayuol Yol, Thomas Malual Kap, Puok Bol Mut, Chief Patai Tut, Chief Peter Ring Patai, Chief *24

MEMORANDUM OPINION REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge The plaintiff, Ana Sanchez, brings this action against the defendants, Devashish Hospitality, LLC d/b/a Great Wraps (“Great Wraps”) and Saroj Bhatterai, as the owner and operator of the Great Wraps restaurant located at 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue where she worke

Freedom Mtge. Corp. v Engel (2024 NY Slip Op 24226) [*1] Freedom Mtge. Corp. v Engel 2024 NY Slip Op 24226 Decided on August 22, 2024 Supreme Court, Orange County Sciortino, J. Published by New York State

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE NORTHROP GRUMMAN ) INNOVATION SYSTEMS, INC., ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE ) COMPANY, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS ) AT LLOYDS OF LONDON, ) C.A. No. N18C-09-210 CONTINETAL CASUALTY INSURANCE )

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1812 MARY RODGERS-ROUZIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN QUEEN STEAMBOAT OPERATING COMPANY, LLC and HMS GLOBAL MARITIME LLC, Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United S