Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Walters v. Harry”
HARRY C. WALTERS v. STATE OF FLORIDApublic domain
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT HARRY C. WALTERS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Cas
HARRY C. WALTERS v. STATE OF FLORIDApublic domain
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT HARRY C. WALTERS, DOC # S37472, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No
Walters v. Statepublic domain
Denied.
Walters v. Statepublic domain
Denied.
Walters v. Statepublic domain
Affirmed.
United States v. Walterspublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Gregory F. Van Tatenhove, United States District Judge Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) allows evidence of a criminal defendant’s prior bad acts to be introduced for purposes other than proving a person’s character and his propensity to act in accordance with that character. In this case, the Government and Defendants dispute whether certain evidence is admissible under that
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-IA-00315-SCT TIGER PRODUCTION COMPANY, LLC, CCORE ENERGY MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC, ROBERT MARSH NIPPES AND HARRY WALTERS v. JOHN WEBB PACE, JEANETTE PACE AND JOHN GREGORY PACE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/08/2021 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ROBERT THOMAS BAILEY TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: GEORGE THOMAS DICKERSON KATH
Walters v. Cleveland Regional Medical Centerpublic domain
This is one of two "surgical sponge" cases decided today regarding the time limits placed on medical-malpractice suite.1 The issue here: did Tangie Walters raise a fact issue as to whether she could avail herself of the Open Courts provision2 as *Page 294 an exception to the two-year statute of limitations?
Walters Art Gallery v. Walters Workers Un.public domain
Trustees of the Walters Art Gallery, Inc., et al. v. Walters Workers United, Council 67, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, et al., No. 45, September Term, 2024. Opinion by Biran, J. MARYLAND PUBLIC INFORMATION ACT, MD. CODE ANN., GEN. PROVIS. § 4-101(k)(1)(i) (2014, 2019 REPL. VOL., 2024 SUPP.) – “UNIT OR INSTRUMENTALITY” OF GOVERNMENT – After he died in 1931, Henry Walters left the Walters Art Gallery, adjacent property, and all their contents to the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore “for the benefit of the
756 F.2d 902 244 U.S.App.D.C. 193, 53 USLW 2476 Chris L. GOTT, et al.v.Harry N. WALTERS, Administrator of Veterans' Affairs,Veterans' Administration, et al., Appellants.Chris L. GOTT, et al.v.Harry N. WALTERS, et al., Appellants.Chris L. GOTT, et al.v.Harry N. WALTERS, et al., Appellants. Nos. 82-1159, 82-1448 and 82-1454. United Stat
Walters v. PSRBpublic domain
No. 486 June 4, 2025 41 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON LUKE HOKULE WALTERS, Petitioner, v. PSYCHIATRIC SECURITY REVIEW BOARD, Respondent. Psychiatric Security Review Board 102478; A175054 Submitted June 3, 2024. Harris S. Matarazzo filed the brief for petitioner. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General,
Walters v. PSRBpublic domain
No. 486 June 4, 2025 41 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON LUKE HOKULE WALTERS, Petitioner, v. PSYCHIATRIC SECURITY REVIEW BOARD, Respondent. Psychiatric Security Review Board 102478; A175054 Submitted June 3, 2024. Harris S. Matarazzo filed the brief for petitioner. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General,
948 F.2d 1295 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. H
Foust v. Estate of Walterspublic domain
21 S.W.3d 495 (2000) Charles FOUST and McDaniel Farms, Inc., Appellants/Appellees, v. ESTATE OF Roland WALTERS, Deceased, by and through its Co-Independent Executors, Corey Walters and Rolinda Walters, d/b/a Walters Farms and Russell L. Lindeman d/b/a Rusty's Flying Service, Appellees/Appellants. No. 04-98-00639-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. April 12, 2000.
Walters v. Grossheimpublic domain
554 N.W.2d 530 (1996) Ernest F. WALTERS, Appellant, v. Paul GROSSHEIM and John Thalacker, Appellees. No. 95-1771. Supreme Court of Iowa. September 18, 1996. Ernest F. Walters, Fort Madison, pro se. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Layne M. Lindebak, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Considered by McGIVERIN, C.J., HARRIS, LARSON, TERNUS,
Jurellene Jorman v. Veterans Administration, and Harry N. Walters, Administrator, Defendantspublic domain
830 F.2d 1420 56 USLW 2197 Jurellene JORMAN, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.VETERANS ADMINISTRATION, and Harry N. Walters,Administrator, Defendants- Appellees. No. 86-2933. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued April 24, 1987.Decided Sept. 21, 1987.Rehearing Denied Dec. 9, 1987.
821 F.2d 789 261 U.S.App.D.C. 301 Maria H. TIJERINA, Appellant,v.Honorable Harry N. WALTERS, Administrator of Veterans'Affairs, et al.Lorenzo Wilson TIJERINA, Appellant,v.Honorable Harry N. WALTERS, Administrator of Veterans' Affairs, et al. Nos. 85-6240, 85-6241. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.Argued Nov. 17, 19
United States v. Raymon Walterspublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _________________ No. 22-1812 _________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. RAYMON WALTERS, Appellant _________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Price v. Walterspublic domain
OPALA, Justice, with whom ALMA WILSON, Chief Justice and LAVENDER and HARGRAVE, Justices, join, dissenting. Holding that the press release in issue is a fair and true report of two separate judicial proceedings,1 the court affirms a nisi prius summary judgment which extends the protection of the 12 O.S.1991 § 1443.12 statutory privilege to Walt
ARCHER, Circuit Judge. Appellant, Major Guy B. Roberts (Roberts), appeals from the Memorandum Order dated March 29, 1985, of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia granting summary judgment to the appellees and dismissing Robert’s claim on the basis that the jurisidictional bar of 38 U.S.C. § 211(a) (1982) p