Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION Patrick M. Flatley, United States Bankruptcy Judge Walter Flint (the “Debtor”) filed this adversary proceeding against the West Virginia State Tax Department (“WV Tax”) alleging violations of the Bankruptcy Code’s discharge injunction set forth in 11 U.S.C. § 524(a)(2) and seeking damages stemming from that alleged violation. The Defendant seeks summary judgment in its

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0236p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ IN RE: FLINT WATER CASES. │ _________________________________________

198 Mich. App. 153 (1993) 497 N.W.2d 542 CITY OF FLINT v. PATEL Docket No. 133183. Michigan Court of Appeals. Submitted June 3, 1992, at Lansing. Decided February 1, 1993, at 9:40 A.M. Mason, Steinhardt, Jacobs & Perlman, P.C. (by Walter B. Mason, Jr., Frederick D. Steinhardt, and Jonathan B. Frank),

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0244p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ IN RE: FLINT WATER CASES. │ ______________________________________________

HINES, Justice. We granted defendant Lorenzo Flint’s application for a certificate of probable cause to appeal an order dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to consider the propriety of the habeas court’s conclusion that, under OCGA § 9-14-48 (e),1 the State had proven that it was prejudiced in its ability to respond to petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus due to pe

594 F.Supp. 443 (1984) William T. FLINT, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, California State Department of Consumer Affairs Board of Accountancy, Della Bousquet, Marie Shibuya-Snell, Donald Chang, Thomas E. Ilno, individually and in their official capacities, Defendants. Civ. No. S-83-1407 LKK. United States District Court, E.D. California. September 17, 1984.

JUDITH E. LEVY, United States District Judge *822This is a class action lawsuit that is part of the litigation collectively referred to as the Flint Water Cases. To those following these cases, the facts are by now well known. Plaintiffs, residents and property owners in Flint, Michigan, were exposed to lead, legionella, and other contaminants within the municipal wate

The Ohio Bell Telephone Company, defendant-appellant, appeals the trial court order finding it in violation of R.C. 4549.46 and holding it liable to John Flint, plaintiff-appellee, in the amount of $3,259. We affirm. Facts On November 18, 1980, John Flint purchased a 1974 Dodge Tradesman van from the Ohio Bell Telephone Company (Ohio Bell). In connection with the purchase, Ohio Bell executed Form 8380

570 F.3d 775 (2009) Betty Jean BRAGG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FLINT BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 08-1632. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Submitted: April 30, 2009. Decided and Filed: May 13, 2009. ON BRIEF: Shelley A. Stasson, Law Office, West Bloomfield, Michigan, for Appellant. Mary Massaron Ross, Hilary An

492 F.Supp.2d 754 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Eddie WALTERS, Defendant. No. 1:07-CR-30. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. June 7, 2007. *755 Brian P. Lennon, U.S. Attorney, Grand Rapids, MI, for Plaintiff. Daniel R. Fagan, Daniel R. Fagan & Associates, P.C., Grand Rapids

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 09a0170p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X - BETTY JEAN BRAGG,

JUDITH E. LEVY, United States District Judge On April 25, 2014, Flint, Michigan's water switched from the supply provided by the Detroit Water and Sewer Department ("DWSD") to water from the Flint River, treated by the Flint Water Treatment Plant ("FWTP"). As set forth in the complaint, from that switch came the Flint water contamination crisis. The water was not treated properly for human consumption, and the residents of Flint did

624 N.W.2d 922 (2001) PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David A. WALTERS, Defendant-Appellee. Docket No. 117495. Supreme Court of Michigan. May 1, 2001. Jennifer M. Granholm, Attorney General, Thomas L. Casey, Solicitor General, Arthur A. Busch, Prosecuting Attorney, and Donald A. Kuebler, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, Flint, MI, for the peo

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2024-KA-01348-COA MYLES FLINT JOHNSON APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/06/2024 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. DEWEY KEY ARTHUR COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: MADISON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR A

40 Mich. App. 613 (1972) 199 N.W.2d 264 WALTER v. CITY OF FLINT Docket No. 10337. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided May 24, 1972. *614 Robert E. Weiss, City Attorney, and Thomas E. Chittle, Assistant City Attorney, for defendant City of Flint. Before: McGREGOR, P.J., and LEVIN and TAR

602 F.3d 758 (2010) ESTATE OF Leon SMITHERS, by his Personal Representative, Homer NORRIS, Jr.; Alan Sharp; Robert Bonner, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF FLINT; Terrance Walker; Brian Murphree, Officers; Gacia, Defendants-Appellees. No. 09-1164. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: March 11, 2010. Decided and Filed: April 21, 2010.

BOGGS, Circuit Judge. The city of Flint, Michigan, adopted a plan in 1985 requiring that 50% of all police officers who are promoted to the rank of sergeant be members of specified “minority” groups. This action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1981 was brought by white police officers who have been passed over at least once1 for promotion because the plan required that minorities be promoted ahead of

92 F.3d 396 71 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 962,69 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,354, 65 USLW 2176 Charles MIDDLETON; W. Osmund Kelly, III; Brian Sepanak;Bruce Sepanak; Stephen Hill; Gregory Doerr; BarrySaunders; Robert Lorey; Maynard Newman; James McLellan;Thomas Hilgendorf, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Cross-Appellees,v.The CITY OF FLINT, MICHIGAN, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant,The Flint Polic

Reid, J. Plaintiff Brooks brought this action on an employment contract, claiming a breach of the contract and unlawful termination of the contract by the defendant. Defendant appeals from a judgment against defendant for $2,813.23. Under an employment contract dated March 9, 1948, defendant *420employed the plaintiff for a period of 1 year from and after March 8, 1948, f

The respondents moved to dismiss this appeal for appellant's failure to perfect or present any record on appeal. The motion is supported by a certificate of the clerk of the superior court as required by rule 42, Rules on Appeal. From this certificate it appears that judgment was entered on June 6, 1944; motion for new trial denied June 30, 1944; notice of appeal filed September 5, 1944; a preliminary stipulation under rule 6(b), Rules on Appeal filed September 14, 1944; notice to the