Cases

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge In January 2011, Plaintiff John F. Walters filed applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. See AR 123-38. The applications were denied initi

This case involves the statutory redemption of real property. On January 6, 1986, Raines Property, Inc., executed a mortgage on Lots 58, 72, and 73 in the Crossgate Subdivision, Second Sector, to Jefferson Federal Savings and Loan Association of Birmingham (Jefferson Federal). On February 27, 1987, Raines Property conveyed all three lots to W. Barrett Nichols, Jr. On March 8, 1991, the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) acquired all of the assets of Jefferson Federal. Th

STEWART D. AARON, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE *655Before the Court is a motion for attorney's fees, pursuant to the Social Security Act (the "Act"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 406(b) and 1383(d)(2), by plaintiff's counsel, Christoph

291 S.W.3d 508 (2009) Johnnie F. COLVIN, Appellant, v. James R. COLVIN, Appellee. No. 12-08-00314-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Tyler. July 8, 2009. *510 Douglas J. McCarver, Nacogdoches, for appellant. Paul A. Robbins, for appellee. Panel consisted of WORTHEN, C.J., GRIFFITH, J., and BASS, J., Retired Justice, Twe

MEMORANDUM Honorable Richard P. Conaboy, United States District Judge I. Procedural Background. We consider here Plaintiffs appeal from a decision of the Social Security Administration (“SSA” or “Agency”) denying his application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”). Plaintiff initially alleged a period of disability beginning June 30, 2011. (R.12). After appearing and testifying a

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. # 12) IN THEIR ENTIRETY: PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS TO SAID JUDICIAL FILING (DOC. #13) ARE OVERRULED; JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT CAROLYN W. COL-VIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, REVERSING COMMISSIONER’S DECISION THAT PLAINTIFF WAS NOT DISABLED AND, THEREFORE, NOT ENTITLED TO BENEFITS UNDER THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT,

DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Scott Wilbur Colegrove (“Plaintiff’) brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) seeking review of the final decision of Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”), denying Plaintiff’s application for disability insurance benefits. (Dkt. 1). Plain

899 F.2d 1216 Colvin (Benton)v.Desmond (David A.), Shearer (Robert C.), Prison Bd. MembersCounty Commissioners, Dempsey (Thomas W.), Day (H. James),Yaw (Charles), Knight (Andrew), Hall (Steve), Hartley(Gary), Berkheiser (Sandra, R.N.), Cillo (Michael),Steinbacher (Walter A.), Fink (Jerry P.), NO. 89-5785 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit.

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-7391 JOHN WALTERS, Petitioner – Appellant, v. MICHAEL MARTIN, Warden, Huttonsville Correctional Center, Respondent – Appellee, and JOHN T. MURPHY, Respondent. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS, Amicus Supporting Appel

*452MEMORANDUM & ORDER WILLIAM G. YOUNG, U.S. District Judge1 I. INTRODUCTION The Plaintiff Melissa Church (“Church”) brings this action against Carolyn W. Col-vin, the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (the “Commissioner”), seeking reversal or remand of the Commissioner’s denial of

MEMORANDUM MALACHY E. MANNION, United States District Judge Pending before the court is the report of Judge Cohn, the magistrate judge to whom the above matter was referred,1 (Doc. 18), which recommends that the Court enter judgment in favor of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and against Plaintiff Teresa Weidman. More specifically, the report

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________ ) OMAR HARVEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 13-1957 (RMC) (DAR) ) CAROLYN W. COLVIN,

ORDER Neil V. Wake, United States District Judge. Plaintiff Robert I. Grim seeks review under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”), which denied him disability insurance benefits under sections 216(i)' and 223(d) of the Social Security Act. Because the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) is not supported by substantial evidenc

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition, filed July 1, 2014 (Doc. 26) (“PFRD”), recommending that the .Court deny Plaintiff Penny H. Rose’s Motion for Reversal and Remand for Further Procee

MEMORANDUM OPINION Savage, District Judge. The issue presented in this Social Security case is whether the total award of attorneys’ fees to the attorney who represented the claimant at the administrative level and to another attorney who' represented him on judicial review may exceed 25 percent of the claimant’s past-due benefits. It is an issue that has divided the circuit courts of appeals, and one the

ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING KEARNEY’S OBJECTIONS (Doc. # 16) TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. # 14); ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IN ITS ENTIRETY; AFFIRMING THE ALJ’S DETERMINATION THAT KEARNEY WAS NOT DISABLED AND TERMINATING THIS CASE THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge. Kelly Kearney (“Kearney”) brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicia

AMENDED1 ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING FAIRCHILD’S OBJECTIONS (Doc. #16) TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. # 15) IN ITS ENTIRETY; AFFIRMING THE COMMISSIONER’S DECISION THAT FAIRCHILD WAS DISABLED AS OF JANUARY 19, 2011, BUT NOT BEFORE, AND TERMINATING THIS CASE THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge. Jen

ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING MIXON’S OBJECTIONS (Doc. # 13) TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. #12) IN ITS ENTIRETY; AFFIRMING THE COMMISSIONER’S DECISION THAT MIXON WAS NOT DISABLED AND TERMINATING THIS CASE THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge. John Mixon (“Mixon”) brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judici

ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING SHILO’S OBJECTIONS (Doc. # 15) TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. # 14) IN ITS ENTIRETY; AFFIRMING THE COMMISSIONER’S DECISION THAT SHILO WAS NOT DISABLED AND TERMINATING THIS CASE THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge. Matthew Shilo (“Shilo”) brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judic

ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING SMEAD’S OBJECTIONS (Doc. # 12) TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. #11) IN ITS ENTIRETY; AFFIRMING THE COMMISSIONER’S FINAL NON-DISABILITY DETERMINATION AND TERMINATING THIS CASE THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge. Mark Smead (“Smead”) brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial re