Cases

780 F.2d 1025 Colev.Walters 84-6552 United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. 12/4/85 1 C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED

In re Walter Cole; — Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review State Civil Service Commission, No. S-17523; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2014 CA 0936. Writ not considered. Not timely filed. See Supreme Court Rule X, § 5.

CRAIN, J. | ¾Walter Cole appeals a final decision of the Civil Service Commission upholding his dismissal from a permanent status position of Horticultural Attendant with the Office of State Buildings (OSB) in the Division of Administration (DOA). We affirm. FACTS As a Horticultural Attendant, Cole’s typical duties included trimming hedges, cutting grass, pulling weeds, and similar man

PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. See Mobley v. McNeil, 989 So.2d 1215 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). KAHN, BROWNING and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

622 F.Supp.2d 632 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Robert G. COLE, Defendant. Case No. 5:08-cr-00327. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio. December 11, 2008. *633 Justin J. Roberts, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Cleveland, OH, for Plaintiff. Ralph E. Cascarilla, Walter & Haverfield, Cleveland, OH, for

ORDER Michael Garrison, proceeding pro se, appeals a district court judgment dismissing his civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a). Seeking monetary relief (includ

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DA.VIS, United States Magistrate Judge. . This matter is before the Court on the cross-motions of the parties for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P. This case is before the undersigned Magistrate Judge by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). Plaintiff filed an application under the Soc

(2007) ROBERT L. COLE; LILLIE R. ASH; JESSIE M. HAYNES; JOYCE M. LOFTIN; DORETHA S. HICKS; RENNETE McKNIGHT; RANDY BEESLEY; CHARLES WILLIAMS; SHELIA A. BOOTH; BERTIE W. DAVIS; MARGARETT COLEMAN; MARY REVETTE; JANET REVETTE; BRENDA JOHNSON; PATTY McDONALD; DEBORAH A. MADISON; LELA M. HALL; SHARRON BUCHANAN; EARNESTINE FORTENBERRY; DENISE MIKELL; JAMES ARRINGTON; DERITT P. LOPER; WILLIE WOULLARD; LATOYNA Y. RICHARDSON; GLORIA L. BUXTON; MILEHARMAR DODSON;

15 P.3d 820 (2000) 135 Idaho 107 Charles COLE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE of Idaho, Respondent. No. 26433. Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, September 2000 Term. December 1, 2000. *822 Ronaldo A. Coulter, State Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Mary K. Patton argued. Hon. Alan G. Lan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DAVID COLE, Plaintiff, v. Civ. Action No. 15-1991 (EGS/GMH) LAURIE E. LOCASCIO, 1 et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff David Cole (“Mr. Cole” or “Plaintiff”) initiated this action against the National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”) and the

By Judge T. J. Markow This case is before the Court on Demurrer, Motion to Dismiss/Motion for Summary Judgment, Special Plea in Bar and Plea of Sovereign Immunity. The pertinent facts are as follows. On September 9, 1992, Plaintiff Walter Cole purchased a ticket in the Virginia Lottery. His number was drawn on September 12, 1992. On September 16, 1992, he appeared in person at the office of the Virginia L

ORDER PER CURIAM. Defendant appeals from his conviction by a jury of one count of second-degree murder, § 565.021.1, RSMo 1994, and one count of armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1994, for which he was sentenced to consecutive terms of fifteen years’ imprisonment and three years’ imprisonment respectively. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on app

465 S.E.2d 820 (1996) Cleveland HUGHES, et al. v. Walter COLE, et al. Walter COLE, et al. v. Russell E. TWIFORD, et al. Record Nos. 950520, 950513. Supreme Court of Virginia. January 12, 1996. *823 Stephen C. Swain (S. Geoffrey Glick; Frances W. Russell; Clark & Stant, on briefs), Virginia Beach, for Hughes. <

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DAVID COLE, Plaintiff, Civ. Action No. 15-1991 (EGS/GMH) v. WALTER G. COPAN, 1 et al. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff David Cole (“Mr. Cole” or “Plaintiff”) has sued Defendants, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”) and the Feder

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN 444444444444444444444444444 ON MOTION FOR REHEARING 444444444444444444444444444 NO. 03-03-00582-CV Britton Cherish Walters, Appellant v. Columbia/St. David’s Healthcare System, L.P.; Hospital Internists of Austin, P.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DAVID COLE, Plaintiff, v. No. 19-cv-1070 (DLF) 1 JAMES K. OLTHOFF, Acting Director, National Institute for Standards and Technology, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION David Cole b

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN ON MOTION FOR REHEARING NO. 03-03

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-03-00582-CV Britton Cherish Walters, Appellant v. Columbia/St. David’s Healthcare System, L.P.; Hospital Internists of Austin, P.A.; Steven Todd Cole, D.O.; and Louis J. Lux, M.D., Appellees<

Opinion COLE, J. The appellant, James Andrew Walters, was adjudged an habitual offender under Code § 46.1-387.2(a) in Hanover County Circuit Court. The court suspended Walters’ privilege to drive upon the highways of the Commonwealth for ten years. In this appeal, Walters attacks two of the three convictions which led to his adjudication as an habitual offender. He contends that these convictions, both for driv

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DAVID COLE, Plaintiff, v. No. 19-cv-1070 (DLF) WALTER G. COPAN, Director, National Institute for Standards and Technology, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION David Cole brings this lawsuit against t