Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Walter R Frederick and Cindy L Frederick”
Revolaze, L.L.C. v. Dentons US L.L.P.public domain
[Cite as Revolaze, L.L.C. v. Dentons US L.L.P., 2022-Ohio-1392.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA REVOLAZE LLC, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 109742 v. : DENTONS US LLP, ET A
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT S.K. CONDOMINIUM II ASSOCIATION, ) INC. and SKBP, LLC, ) ) Appellants, )
Southpointe Golf Club, Pet v. Southpointe Propertypublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT SOUTHPOINTE GOLF CLUB, INC., : No. 217 WAL 2021 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v. : Commonwealth Court :
264 F.3d 344 (3rd Cir. 2001) IN RE: ORTHOPEDIC BONE SCREW PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION (MDL No. 1014)J.T. Bradley and Kathy W. Bradley, Appellants in No. 00-3899Regina M. Luellen and Eurston Luellen, Sr., Appellants in No. 00-3900Randal Jon Uribe, Appellant in No. 00-3901Mitchell H. Walker and Kim S. Walker, Appellants in No. 00-3902Jose Morfin, Appellant in No. 00-3903Mary K. Mullen Schmelter and Kurt Allen Schmelter, Appel
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
Urso v. Bradley Universitypublic domain
2023 IL App (4th) 230165 FILED NO. 4-23-0165 December 27, 2023 Carla Bender th
COPE, J. This is an appeal of a final judgment of adoption, under which F.G. became the adoptive father of two boys, X.X.G. and N.R.G. (collectively, “the children”). The trial court found, and all parties agree, that F.G. is a fit parent and that the adoption is in the best interest of the children. The question in the case is whether the adoption should have been denied because F.G. is a homosexual. Und
MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBINSON, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Presently before the court is plaintiffs’ Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co., Inc. (“LWD”), Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc. (“RDC”) and Meijer, Inc. and Meijer Distribution, Inc. (together, “Meijer”) (collec*220tively, the “direct purchaser plaintiffs” or the (“proposed DP
241 F.Supp.2d 1119 (2002) In re QWEST COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC. SECURTIES LITIGATION No. CIV.01-RB-1451 (PAC), CIV.A.01-RB-1472, CIV.A.01-RB-1527, CIV. A.01-RB-1616, CIV.A.01-RB-1799, CIV.A.01-RB-1930, CIV.A.01-R2083, CIV.A.02-RB-333, CIV.A.02-R374, CIV.A.02-d-507, CIV.A.02-R658, CIV.A.02-RB-755, CIV.A.02-R798. United States District Court, D. Colorado. November 25, 2002.
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
991 F.2d 1195 Sharon L. NICHOLS, David R. Nichols, Virginia Ann Callan,Charles Oliver Richardson, III, Marilyn Goodman, Thomas J.Goodman, Debra A. Lopez, Rudolph Lopez, Sharon RuthAnderson, Rosemary Madrid Castaneda, Jesse Castaneda, KarenLeslie-Lloyd, Jacqueline Templin, Katherine Galati Novick,Karen Janet Davis, Peggy Lee Patterson, Michelle James,Patricia Ann Ehlert, Dana Messerly, Raymond Leroy Messerly,Susan Gail Pa
Neverkovec v. Frederickspublic domain
87 Cal.Rptr.2d 856 (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 337 Larry NEVERKOVEC, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Joseph Gregory FREDERICKS, Defendant and Respondent. No. A081405. Court of Appeal, First District, Division Three. August 18, 1999. *859 Law Offices of Harry D. Roth, Harry D. Roth, Davis, and Karen L. Blank, for Pla
United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.public domain
793 F.Supp.2d 164 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 99-2496 (GK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 22, 2011. *165 Daniel K. Crane-Hirsch, Linda Margaret McMahon, Renee Brooker, U.S. Department of Justice Office of Consumer Litigatio
Canter v. Hardypublic domain
188 F.Supp.2d 773 (2002) Mark William CANTER and Walter Edwin Moore, Plaintiffs, v. John HARDY, Frederick LaBarge, Douglas Wilt, Kenneth Bur, Carl Goeman, Charles Rettstadt, Research North, Inc., and Debra Parmentier, Defendants. Nos. 97-CV-76290-DT, 97-CV-76291-DT. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. March 6, 2002.
MILLS, District Judge. I. BACKGROUND Eric Wright was born on November 10, 1992, at Wesley Medical Center in Wichita, Kansas. Shortly after birth, his doctor prescribed intravenous treatments of un-concentrated sodium chloride because Wright suffered from low blood pressure. The hospital stocked its unconcentrated sodium chloride solutions in close proxim
Knight v. State of Ala.public domain
787 F.Supp. 1030 (1991) John F. KNIGHT, Jr., Alma S. Freeman, John T. Gibson, Susan Buskey, Carl Petty, Dennis Charles Barnett by his father Arthur D. Barnett, Vonda Cross, Tammi Palmer, Alease S. Sims, Stacey Levise Sims by her parents Levi Sims and Alease S. Sims, Gary Mitchell, Jr., Grover L. Brown, Frederick Carodine, Frankie Patricia Yarbrough, Dr. Charles Edwards McMillan, Horace W. Rice, Anthony Y. Lavonne Thompson by his mother Lois N. Thompson,
Payne v. Tri-State Careflight, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James 0. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Opposed Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(b) Motion and Supporting Memorandum to Intervene as Parties Plaintiff and Class Representatives, tiled November 29, 2016 (Doc. 151)(“Motion to Intervene”); and (ii) the Opposed Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(b) Supplemental Motion and Supporting Memorandum to Intervene
Texas San Marcos Treatment Center, L.P. D/B/A San Marcos Treatment Center v. Veronica Paytonpublic domain
ACCEPTED 03-14-00726-CV 4089429 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS