Cases

HILL, J.: **377Marshell Hill appeals his voluntary manslaughter conviction, contending the trial court erred by admitting several statements the State obtained in violation of Miranda v. Arizona , 384 U.S. 436,

PER CURIAM: Walter Hill, an Alabama inmate convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death, seeks permission to file a successive habeas corpus petition in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. As we conclude the claim advanced by Hill does not satisfy the criteria set out in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2), we deny the application.

PER CURIAM: * Allan Thomas, the plaintiff below, appeals from a take nothing jury verdict in favor of Fred Hill, Jr., on Thomas’s claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12112.1 Thomas contends that the jury’s verdict is incompatible with the evidence presented. For the following reasons, the jury’s verdict stands, and we AFFIRM the judgme

WILLIAMSON,«/., This matter comes before us on Preliminary Objections filed by Buck Hill Falls Company (hereafter “Defendant”) in response to the Complaint filed by Michael J. Walters, et al. (hereafter “Plaintiffs”). Background Plaintiffs in this case are some of the present and former owners of record of developed lots in the community of Buck Hill Falls, Pennsylvania. Defendant is the own

OPINION ROTH, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises out of a civil tax fraud proceeding in United States Tax Court. The taxpayer challenges the Tax Court’s determination that, under the doctrine of collateral estoppel, his previous guilty plea for criminal tax evasion conclusively established the taxability to him of specific income that his criminal indictment

156 Ill. App.3d 708 (1987) 509 N.E.2d 804 CHARLOTTE J. WALTER, Adm'r of the Estate of Richard L. Walter, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JEFFREY HILL, Defendant-Appellee. No. 3-86-0571. Illinois Appellate Court — Third District. Opinion filed June 23, 1987. Raymond C. Rose, of Raymond C. Rose, Ltd., of Peoria (Michael A. Fleming, of counsel

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th day of February 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of March 2005."

SCHUMAN, J. Defendant’s dogs killed plaintiffs’ cat. The trial court found that defendant was negligent and awarded plaintiffs $1,000 in compensatory damages but denied plaintiffs’ claims for negligent infliction of emotional distress and loss of companionship. Plaintiffs appeal, arguing that they should be compensated for emotional distress resulting from witnessing the death of their pet. We affirm. Althou

645 F.3d 900 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Walter D. HILL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-3766. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued May 2, 2011. Decided July 5, 2011. *903 Norman R. Smith, Attorney, Steven D. Weinhoeft (argued), Attorney, Office of the United States Atto

On 31 August 1999, Walter Herman Hill ("defendant") was convicted of assault with a deadly weapon inflicting serious injury. The trial court imposed a suspended sentence of twenty-nine to forty-four months imprisonment and placed defendant on supervised probation for sixty months. As a condition of his probation, defendant was ordered to pay restitution totaling $19,573.95. A violation report filed 20 December 2002 charged that defendant had failed to pay $19,018.95 of the cour

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 13-2709 WALTER D. HILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JOSEPH R. MURPHY, Special Agent, individually, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Co

SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of brevity, portions of any opinion may not have been summarized.) In the Matter of Mark G. Legato, an Attorney at Law (D-99-15) (077464) In the Matter of Regan C.

FEW, C.J. Rizón Commercial Contracting, Inc. appeals the circuit court’s order vacating its mechanic’s liens and dismissing its counterclaim for foreclosure. We find the circuit court erred in determining as a matter of law that Rizón was not a “laborer” that performed work “for the improvement of real estate” under subsection 29-5-20(A) of the South Carolina Code (2007). We reverse and remand for foreclosure proceedings.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 645 In this challenge to a mayoral election, brought by mayoral candidate Vanessa Hill, J.B. (Johnny) Washington appeals the decision of the Hale Circuit Court declaring Hill to have been duly elected as mayor of the Town of Greensboro. We affirm. I. Facts and Procedural History

(2008) Thomas S. HILL, Plaintiff, v. JOHN ALDEN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Belinda Call, an individual, and Insurance Systems, Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:07-0728. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Huntington Division. April 18, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT C. CHAMBERS, District Judge. Pending before this Co

DIETZ, Judge. *772 This case concerns the operation of a small airport in the town of Ocean Isle Beach. Jackson/Hill Aviation, Inc. contracted with the town to operate the airport. A dispute later broke out because Jackson/Hill did not always staff the airport with an employee. Ocean Isle Be

274 Neb. 859 IN RE INTEREST OF WALTER W., A CHILD UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE. STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE, v. MARTINA A., APPELLANT. No. S-07-393. Supreme Court of Nebraska. Filed January 18, 2008. Marian G. Heaney, of Legal Aid of Nebraska, for appellant. Regina T. Makaitis, Special Prosecutor, for appellee. Sarah Helvey and Jennifer A. Carter for amic

OPINION Justice McCAFFERY. In this medical malpractice appeal, we restate and apply to the record herein the standards and conditions appropriate for granting summary judgment. Determining that the trial court and Superior Court misapplied the appropriate standards in this case, and inappropriately determined this case on “deemed admissions” under the circumstances here present, we reverse and

05/13/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE March 6, 2019 Session HOWARD WHITE ET AL. v. WALTER C. GRIMES Appeal from the Chancery Court for Maury County No. 16-233 Stella L. Hargrove, Judge _____________________

KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge: Twelve appellants, either currently or formerly incarcerated in the State of Georgia, appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of eight former and current members of the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles (“Board”) on the appellants’ claims that the Board retroactively applied a secret parole policy that extended their sentences