Cases

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 694 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 695 Defendant-appellant, Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company ("Nationwide"), appeals a judgment of the Clinton County Court of Commo

MINORA, L, I. INTRODUCTION Currently before the court are two matters which we will dispose of in this consolidated memorandum and order. The first is the plaintiff’s preliminary objections to defendants’ amended answer, new matter and counterclaim. The second is plaintiff’s motion to sever and stay defendants’ counterclaim. Both of these filings took place on May 27, 2004. Other unrelate

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of Supreme Court, Erie County (Makowski, J.), entered May 9, 2001, which, inter alia, granted that part of plaintiff’s motion seeking a declaration. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by denying plaintiffs motion in its entirety and granting that part of the cross motion of defendant Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co

23 So.3d 1232 (2009) The ESTATE OF Steven Adam TINERVIN as assignee of Zenaida R. Gonzales and Alfredo V. Gonzales, M.D., P.A., Appellants, v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. No. 4D08-2151. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. November 25, 2009. Rehearing Denied January 28, 2010. *1234

Stinson v. Union Mutual Fire Ins. Co., 103-7-18 Oecv (Harris, J., Apr. 1, 2019) [The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from the original. The accuracy of the text and the accompanying data included in the Vermont trial court opinion database is not guaranteed.] STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL DIVIS

502 S.E.2d 648 (1998) NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Christopher T. GRADY, and John Van B. Metts, Defendants. No. COA97-883. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. July 21, 1998. *650 Bailey & Dixon, L.L.P. by David S. Coats, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellee. Thompson & Smyth, L.L.P. by Theodor

OPINION AND ORDER Ann Aiken, United States District Judge This dispute concerns defendant County Mutual Insurance Company’s (“defendant”) alleged failure to issue a policy on terms agreed to between plaintiffs Jared and Myranda Rediger (“plaintiffs”) .and insurance agent Bob Bronson (“agent”). Defendant moves to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(7) for failure to join a party under Fed. R. Civ. P. 19. For the

442 S.E.2d 340 (1994) 114 N.C. App. 604 NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Irvin L. NUNN, Geraldine Nunn, Hallie W. Nunn, and Vali L. McKnight, v. Jim CRISP d/b/a Jim Crisp Insurance Agency. No. 9315SC831. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. May 3, 1994. *341 Morgan & Reeves by Robert

Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Nelson v. Country Mutual Insurance Co., 2014 IL App (1st) 131036 Appellate Court FOREST LEE NELSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTRY Caption MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. District & No. First District, Fourth Division Docket No. 1-13-1036 Filed

MEMORANDUM LIMBAUGH, District Judge. Plaintiff Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company (Nationwide) initiated this declaratory judgment action wherein plaintiff has requested this Court to declare the rights of the parties under a certain policy of insurance with respect to fire claims made by Walter Fleming and Teresa Fleming. Defendants counterclaimed for the loss occasioned by the fire. Plaintiff’s comp

825 So.2d 999 (2002) NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Howard J. BEVILLE, Jr., and Belville II, Inc., Appellees. No. 4D01-858. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. August 7, 2002. Rehearing Denied September 30, 2002. *1000 Hala A. Sandridge and Tracy Raffles Gunn of Fowler,

679 A.2d 71 (1996) John B. DEVANEY, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant Below, Appellee. No. 302, 1995. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: April 16, 1996. Decided: July 10, 1996. *72 James J. Woods, Jr. of Connolly, Bove, Lodge & Hutz, Wilmington, for Appellant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JOHN R. TUNHEIM, District Judge. Plaintiff Continental Casualty Company (“Continental”) brings this action against defendant National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA (“National Union”) seeking various forms of declaratory relief. Continental seeks contribution from National Union for costs Continental incurred in defending The Val

ORDER James A. Teilborg, Senior United States District Judge The instant matter arises of out Defendant James River Insurance (“James River”)’s refusal to defend and indemnify Sigma Contracting, Inc. (“Sigma”) in litigation over property damage caused by a plumbing subcontractor’s work during construction of a shopping center. Both James River and Plaintiffs National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford (“N

[Cite as Burr v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 2013-Ohio-4406.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) MARC H. BURR C.A. No. 12CA010231 Appellant v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT

750 A.2d 877 (2000) Carolyn BOOZE and Kearston Leder and Michael Dacko, her husband, and David Krebs and Kathleen Harrer and Sander Harrer, h/w, and Jodi Sussman and Gregory Sutton and Lynette Thurston and Edward Peters, as individuals and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellants, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY and Colonial Insurance of California and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and Erie Insurance Company and State Farm Mutua

Order GREGORY A. PRESNELL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Court after a hearing on various motions to dismiss (Doc. 209-211) filed by the Defendants, the response in opposition (Doc. 216) filed by the Plaintiffs, the replies (Doc. 224, 226, 228) filed by the Defendants, and the sur-reply (Doc. 235). I. Background The instant case is one of

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MARY M. LISI, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Objections to the Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Sullivan on December 10, 2013 (Docket #23). The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and considered Plaintiff’s objections, as well as Defendants’ response to Plaintiffs objections. While this Cou

FILED Sep 12 2025, 8:40 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Appellees David and Brenda Szumigala brought this Mississippi diversity action alleging that appellant Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (“Nationwide”) had refused in bad faith to pay insurance claims for combined, or “stacked,”1 medical payment coverages and for uninsured motorist benefits. The Szumigalas sued on two Nationwide auto policies: one policy covering thr