⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

7 opinions for “Wallace v. Mady Construction Company, Inc.”

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-10-16 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00416-CV 7412400 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2008-11-24 · Published · cited 4× · 5 So. 3d 874; 2007 La.App. 1 Cir. 2104; 2008 La. App. LEXIS 1547; 2008 WL 4975950
GUIDRY, J. |2A truck driver appeals the allocation of fault and general damages awards rendered by the trial court pursuant to a jury verdict for an accident in which the trailer of his 18-wheeler collided with an overhanging tree limb while traveling down a state highway. The State of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD), separately appeals the trial court’s judgment finding it liable and
District Court, D. Maryland · 1981-01-15 · Published · cited 6× · 504 F. Supp. 1301; 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10311; 25 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1573
504 F.Supp. 1301 (1981) Wallace E. DAY et al. v. PATAPSCO & BACK RIVERS RAILROAD COMPANY et al. Civ. No. Y-76-1484. United States District Court, D. Maryland. January 15, 1981. *1302 *1303 Kenneth L. Johnson, Anthony W. Robinson, Baltimore, Md., and Dorothy R. Fait, Silver Spring, Md., for
Supreme Court of the United States · 2010-06-28 · Published · cited 2044× · 177 L. Ed. 2d 894; 130 S. Ct. 3020; 561 U.S. 742; 2010 U.S. LEXIS 5523; 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 619; 78 U.S.L.W. 4844
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2009 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-10-17 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00075-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/17/2025 10:43 AM No. 15-25-00075-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Supreme Court of the United States · 2012-06-28 · Published · cited 1029× · 183 L. Ed. 2d 450; 132 S. Ct. 2566; 567 U.S. 519; 2012 U.S. LEXIS 4876
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2011 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit