Cases

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-appellant Jack O’Connor appeals from an opinion and order of the United States District Court for the District of Vermont (Sessions, J.) dated August 7, 2008, granting plaintiff-appellee Rico Diamond’s motion for judgment as a matter of law regarding his Fourth Amendment claim and awarding him nominal damages of $1 and reasonable attorneys’ fees. Diamond cross-appeals an order of the district court den

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-appellant Jack O’Connor appeals from an opinion and order of the United States District Court for the District of Vermont (Sessions, J.) dated August 7, 2008, granting plaintiff-appellee Rico Diamond’s motion for judgment as a matter of law regarding his Fourth Amendment claim and awarding him nominal damages of $1 and reasonable attorneys’ fees. Diamond cross-appeals an order of the district court den

JOHN M. WALKER, JR., Chief Judge. After being placed on administrative leave pending an investigation, plaintiff-appellant Thomas O’Connor, a teacher working for the Wethersfield Board of Education, was invited back to work conditioned on a psychiatric examination and his release of past medical records. O’Con-nor’s lawsuit in state court, removed to federal court, asserted procedural and substantive due process claims in op

351 Ill. App. 545 (1953) 115 N.E.2d 808 People of State of Illinois ex rel. Lyle G. Walker, Appellee, v. Timothy J. O'Connor, Commissioner of Police of City of Chicago et al., Appellants. Gen. No. 45,957. Illinois Appellate Court. Opinion filed July 2, 1953. Rehearing allowed July 28, 1953. New opinion filed October 7, 1

{¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. Paul W. Flowers Co., L.P.A., and Paul W. Flowers; and Becker & Mishkind Co., L.P.A., and Michael F. Becker, for appellees. Tucker Ellis & West, L.L.P., and Irene C. Keyse-Walker; and R

269 S.W.3d 90 (2008) HOUSTON PIPE LINE COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a Houston Pipe Line Company, Energy Transfer Equity, L.P., Energy Transfer Partners, L.P., and LA Grange Acquisition, L.P. d/b/a Energy Transfer Company, Appellants, v. O'CONNOR & HEWITT, LTD., Appellee. In re Houston Pipe Line Company, L.P. d/b/a Houston Pipe Line Company, Energy Transfer Equity, L.P., Energy Transfer Partners, L.P., and LA Grange Acquisition, L.P. d/b/a Energy Tra

PROCEEDINGS: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO PROHIBIT THE DEPOSITION OF LARRY TROXEL CHAPMAN, United States Magistrate Judge. On August 1, 2003, plaintiffs and defendant Boeing North American, Inc. (“Boeing”) submitted concurrent letter briefs, with exhibits, and plaintiffs filed the declaration of A. Barry Cappello, with exhibits. Oral argument was held telephonically before Magistrate Judg

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I agree with the court that the thirty-four Plaintiffs who filed their claims prior to the release of the 1997 UCLA Study failed to make a sufficient evidentiary showing as to how they discovered their claims, and I therefore concur in affirming the grant of summary judgment as analyzed in Part II of the

O'ROURKE, Acting P. J. Appellants Brian O'Connor and Astrid O'Connor Bassett appeal from orders (1) declaring that decedent John O'Connor's power of appointment exercised in his will complied with the requirements of Probate Code 1 section 632 and (2) for probate of his will. The sole question for our independent review arising out of both appeals is whether the language in the decedent's will-"I exercise any Power of Appointment wh

Wade, C. J. 1. , The death of a prominent- member of the bar shortly before the time for convening a term of the superior court is not such cause as will legally authorize the judge in vacation to adjourn the term. Civil Code (1910),- §§ 4873-5; Hoye v. State, 39, Ga. 718; Frank v. Horkan, 122 Ga. 38 (49 S. E. 800). See also Osgood v. State

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR DECERTIFICATION AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO INTERVENE ADDITIONAL CLASS REPRESENTATIVES COLLINS, District Judge. Defendants’ Motion for Decertification of Classes and Plaintiffs’ Motion to Intervene New Class Representatives came on regularly for hearing before this Court on duly 10, 2000. After considering the materials pre

114 F.Supp.2d 949 (2000) Lawrence O'CONNOR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BOEING NORTH AMERICAN, INC. and Rockwell International Corporation, Defendants. No. CV 97-1554 ABC (RCX). United States District Court, C.D. California. June 12, 2000. *950 Capello & McCann, A. Barry Cappello, Santa Barbara, CA, Gancedo & Nieves, Tina Niev

92 F.Supp.2d 1026 (2000) Lawrence O'CONNOR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BOEING NORTH AMERICAN, INC. and Rockwell International Corporation, Defendants. No. CV 97-1554 ABC (RCX). United States District Court, C.D. California. March 28, 2000. *1027 A. Barry Cappello, Leila J. Noel, J. Paul Gignac, Kim A. Seefeld, Troy A. Thielemann, Cap

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-21-00159-CV In re David O’Connor ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator David O’Connor has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking relief from a temporary order requiring him to pay $4,205 in attorney’s fees to the attorney for real party in interest

PROCEEDINGS: (1) PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES RE THE MANNER OF PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES; AND (2) DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS CHAPMAN, United States Magistrate Judge. On March 5, 1999, plaintiffs filed a notice of motion and motion to compe

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff seeks review of the denial of his applications for Supplemental Security Income and Disability Insurance Benefits. Plaintiff contends the ALJ erred by rejecting his testimony and several medical opinions, and erred in determining his reasoning capability. Dkt. 20. As discussed below, the Court REVERSES the Commissioner's final decision and REM

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS LAURENCE O’CONNOR, ET. AL.’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION COLLINS, District Judge. Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification came on regularly for hearing before this Court on October 20, 1997. After reviewing the materials submitted by the parties, argument of counsel, and the case file, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ motion is DENIED. I. Background

OPINION SUE WALKER, Justice. I. INTRODUCTION The primary issue we address in this interlocutory appeal is whether appellants *830 Foundation Assessment, Inc., d/b/a Engineering Design & Assessment, and Suraj K. Choudhury waived their right to dis

Filed 8/29/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Estate of JOHN O'CONNOR, Deceased. D071284 KEVIN O'CONNOR, as Executor, etc., Petitioner and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 37-2015-00003609-PR-PW-CTL

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION COLLINS, District Judge. Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification came on regularly for hearing before this Court on July 13, 1998. After reviewing the materials submitted by the parties, argument of counsel, and the case file, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED. I. Background The factual backg