Cases

942 S.W.2d 796 (1997) AIU INSURANCE COMPANY, Lexington Insurance Company, American Home Assurance Company, Birmingham Fire Insurance Company of Pennsylvania, Granite State Insurance Company, Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, Landmark Insurance Company, and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa, Relators, v. The Honorable Judge James MEHAFFY, Jr., Respondent. No. 09-97-090 CV.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AS TO LATE NOTICE TO AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY (PHASE IV) THOMAS E. BAYNES, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge. THIS CAUSE came on to be heard upon a final evidentiary hearing concerning whether the Debtor gave reasonable notice of asbestos property damage claims to .American Insurance Company (American). The Court previously ruled on the question of Debtor’s reasonable notice

Dwyer, J. ¶1 “Stigma damages” and “diminished value” damages are not synonymous. See Moeller v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Wash., 173 Wn.2d 264, 271, 267 P.3d 998 (2011). In this underinsured motorist insurance coverage dispute, Firoz Ibrahim produced evidence of stigma damages; asserted that it was evidence of diminished value damages; contended that the loss was, therefore, covered by his AIU Insurance Company policy; and fil

216 B.R. 867 (1997) In the Matter of The CELOTEX CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. The CELOTEX CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiff, v. AIU INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy Nos. 90-10016-8B1, 90-10017-8B1, Adversary No. 91-40. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. December 22, 1997. *868

194 B.R. 668 (1996) In re The CELOTEX CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. The CELOTEX CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AIU INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy Nos. 90-10016-8B1, 90-10017-8B1. Adv. No. 91-40. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. April 17, 1996. *669

196 B.R. 611 (1996) In the Matter of The CELOTEX CORPORATION, Debtor. The CELOTEX CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AIU INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy Nos. 90-10016-8B1, 90-10017-8B1. Adv. No. 91-40. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. May 23, 1996. *612 Jeffrey W. Warren, Bush,

ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THOMAS E. BAYNES, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge. THIS CAUSE came on for consideration upon cross Motions for Summary Judgment by Defendant, Northbrook,1 and Debt- or/Plaintiff (Debtor). This Court considered all arguments and evidence consistent with a ruling on a motion for summary judgment. See Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ════════════

175 B.R. 98 (1994) In the Matter of the CELOTEX CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. The CELOTEX CORPORATION and Carey Canada, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. AIU INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 90-10016-8B1. Adv. No. 91-40. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. November 15, 1994. *99

196 B.R. 973 (1996) In the Matter of the CELOTEX CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. The CELOTEX CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiff, v. AIU INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy Nos. 90-10016-8B1, 90-10017-8B1. Adv. No. 91-40. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. June 7, 1996. *974

<•• ••",- : r r ~ • •- '•• •••-,-- 2DI3MDV -U Pi, (2: 33 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FIROZ IBRAHIM, DIVISION ONE Appellant, No. 69554-1-1 v. AlU INSURANCE COMPANY, PUBLISHED OPINION a foreign insurer,

196 B.R. 602 (1996) In re The CELOTEX CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. The CELOTEX CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AIU INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy Nos. 90-10016-8B1, 90-10017-8B1. Adv. No. 91-40. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. May 21, 1996. *603 Jeffrey W. Warren, Bush, Ro

Daniel J. Lynn, Donald C. Brown, Timothy R. Dingilian, Jackson & Campbell, P.C., One Lafayette Centre, 300 South Tower, 1120 20th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20036, Stephen W. Funk, Ronald B. Lee, Roetzel & Andress, L.P.A., One Cleveland Center, 10th Floor, 1375 East Ninth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44114, Arthur M. Kaufman, Kaufman, Drozdowski & Grendell, L.L.C., 29525 Chagrin Blvd., Pepper Pike, Ohio 4412

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA _______________ No. 25-0349 Filed January 28, 2026 _______________ Compass Group USA and AIU Insurance Company, Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. Todd Hawk, Defendant–Appellee. _______________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2020-CT-01181-SCT JEREMY THORNHILL v. WALKER-HILL ENVIRONMENTAL AND ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/11/2020 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ANTHONY ALAN MOZINGO TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: NATHAN L. BURROW AMANDA HILL FRITZ OLIVIA YEN TRUONG

32 F.3d 851 63 USLW 2122, 30 Fed.R.Serv.3d 513 RHONE-POULENC RORER INC. and Armour Pharmaceutical Company,Petitioners,v.The HOME INDEMNITY COMPANY, a New Hampshire corporation,v.AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY INSURANCE; AIU Insurance Company;American Centennial Insurance Company; Birmingham FireInsurance Company; First State Insurance Company; GraniteState Insurance Company; Hartford In

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2020-CA-01181-COA JEREMY THORNHILL APPELLANT v. WALKER-HILL ENVIRONMENTAL AND APPELLEES ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/11/2020 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ANTHONY ALAN MOZINGO COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: MARION

Chief Justice PHILLIPS, joined by Justice O’NEILL, Justice JEFFERSON, and Justice SCHNEIDER, dissenting. Because mandamus is an extraordinary remedy which undermines the normal ap*122pellate process, courts reserve its use for very special circumstances. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839 (Tex.1992). The writ issues when necessary to “corre

DUPONT, C. J. This is an appeal from the trial court’s denial of the motion filed by National Grange Mutual Insurance Company (Grange) to intervene in a declaratory judgment action brought by the plaintiff, AIU Insurance Company (AIU). The question to be resolved in the declaratory judgment action is whether AIU has a duty to indemnify or defend the defendant Daniel Brown under the automobile liability insurance policy that AIU i

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, ) LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE ) COMPANY, CONTINENTAL ) CASUALTY INSURANCE ) COMPANY, NAVIGATORS ) INSURANCE COMPANY, RSUI ) INDEMNITY COMPANY, and ) BERKLEY INSURANCE ) COMPANY,