Cases

Opinion RAYE, P. J. The California Supreme Court’s narrow ruling on a borrower’s standing to challenge the validity of the chain of assignments involved in the securitization of her loans in Yvanova v. New Century Mortgage Corp. (2016) 62 Cal.4th 919 [199 Cal.Rptr.3d 66, 365 P.3d 845] (Yvanova) clarifies what is the dispositive issue in t

[Cite as JPMorgan Chase Bank, Natl. Assn. v. Fallon, 2014-Ohio-525.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PICKAWAY COUNTY JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, : Plaintiff-Appellee, :

ACCEPTED 04-14-00342-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 2/2/2015 9:39:12 AM KEITH HOTTLE

PER CURIAM: Before us on appeal is a matter of first impression regarding the interpretation of *210 § 201 of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 (codified at 28 U.S.C. § 1610 note) (“TRIA”). The plaintiffs-appellees (collectively “Hausler”) are family members or trustees of the estates of vict

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiffs, identified as “ImagePoint, Inc., and ImagePoint, Inc., by James R. Martin, Secured Creditor,” have brought this action against JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association (“JPM”) for various claims arising out of a contract ImagePoint had entered into with JPM for the provision of certain services and mat

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiffs-appellants, investors in certain silver futures and options contracts, appeal from the district court’s March 25, 2013 judgment dismissing their consolidated class action complaint against defendants-appellees JP Morgan Chase & Co., JPMor-gan Clearing Corp., JPMorgan Securities, Inc., JPMorgan Futures Inc., and unnamed John Does (collectively, “JPMor-gan”), and denying their motion to file an am

442 B.R. 297 (2011) In re WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC., et al., Debtors. Black Horse Capital LP, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 08-12229 (MFW). Adversary No. 10-51387 (MFW). United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. January 7, 2011. *299 Bernard G. Conoway, Esquire, Marla Ro

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ED KINKEADE, District Judge. Before the court is Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, filed September 24, 2013. The court has reviewed and considered the motion, response, reply, the pleadings on file, the record in this case, and the applicable law, For the reasons that follow, the court has converted the motion to a motion for summary judgment, and ha

[Cite as Whittington v. Chase #1, 2011-Ohio-2288.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 95728 DARRYL WHITTINGTON PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT vs.

OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, District Judge. Pending before the Court in the above referenced cause, removed from state court and alleging wrongful foreclosure, are Defendant Chase Home Finance LLC’s (“CHF’s”) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, or alternatively, motion for more definite statement (instrument # 4) and Plaintiffs Lawrence Motten and Donna Evans’ request for leav

[Cite as JP Morgan Chase Bank v. Wiram, 2013-Ohio-2232.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR CLARK COUNTY, OHIO JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. : Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO. 2013 CA 3 v. : T.C. NO. 12CV803 CHARLES H. WIRAM, et al. : (Civil appeal from

ORDER HAYES, District Judge: The matters before the Court are the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim (ECF No. 56), and the Motion to Vacate Motion to Certify Class and All Class-Related Dates (ÉCF No. 65) filed by all Defendants. BACKGROUND On July 25, 2012, Plaintiff Nimal Susan-tha Diunugala initiated this actio

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Appellants John and Bettie Priester obtained a loan backed by a lien on their homestead from a bank eventually obtained by JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. The mortgage agreement was signed at the Priesters’ house in violation of the Texas Constitution. Almost five years later, the Priesters sued for a declaratory judgment that the lien was void and that

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO CERTIFY CLASS; GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION; DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE; DIRECTIONS TO PARTIES MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge. Before the Court is plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification, filed October 15, 2010. Defendants Chase Bank U.S.A., N.A., Chase Issuance Trust and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (collectively, “Chase”) h

OPINION OF THE COURT Thomas F. Whelan, J. It is ordered that this motion (No. 001) by the llardo defendants for summary judgment dismissing this mortgage foreclosure action and directing the plaintiff to modify its mortgage in accordance with the terms of a trial period modification plan offered by the plaintiff under the Federal Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) and an order “waiving” all inter

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS [Docket No. 48] JOSEPH C. SPERO, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Patricia McNeary-Calloway, Colin MacKinnon, Terrie McKinnon, Andrea North, and Sheila M. Mayko (collectively “Plaintiffs”) initiated this putative class action on June 20, 2011, challenging Defendants JPMorgan Chase, N.A. and C

OPINION AND ORDER ON THE FOUNDERS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS IN THE UNENCUMBERED ASSETS TRUST CASE JAMES L. GRAHAM, District Judge. This matter is before the court on the motions to dismiss filed by Lance and Barbara Poulsen, Donald Ayers, and Rebecca Parrett (collectively the “Founders”) in the Unencumbered Assets Trust (the “UAT”) case. The UAT is a creation of the bankruptcy court’s April 16, 2004

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER APPROVING MOTION FOR AN ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT AND OTHER RELIEF MARTIN GLENN, United States Bankruptcy Judge Pending before the Court is the Joint Motion of Motors Liquidation Company Avoidance Action Trust and Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors for Entry of (A) Stipulation and Agreed Order (I) Settling Disputed Entitlements of Debtor-in-Possession

ORDER AFFIRMING DECISION OF THE BANKRUPTCY COURT MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge. Appellant Richard Houng (“Houng”), the debtor in a pending Chapter 7 bankruptcy case, appeals from the judgment of the bankruptcy court entered August 1, 2012.1 Appellee Tatung Company, Ltd. (“Tatung”) asserts that judgment was correctly entered.2 I

SUSAN C. BUCKLEW, United States District Judge This cause comes before the Court on Defendant Tervis Tumbler Company's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. 44) and Defendants' Southern Graphics, Inc. and SGS International, LLC's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. 45) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Plaintiff filed a response in opposition to each motion (Doc. 50 and 51). Defe