Cases

FIFTH DIVISION RICKMAN, C. J., MCFADDEN, P. J., and SENIOR APPELLATE JUDGE PHIPPS NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules February 4, 2022

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ January 07, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A21A0558. L. LIN WOOD et al. v. NICOLE WADE et al. In this breach of contract and fraud action between lawyers who formerly worked together and their firms, the trial court granted the plaintiffs’ request for an interlocutory injunction to enjoin the defen

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ October 16, 2020 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A21E0012. WADE et al. v. WOOD et al. Appellants L. Lin Wood and L. Lin Wood, P.C. have filed an emergency motion to stay an injunction. Court of Appeals Rule 40 (b) provides in relevant part: In the exercise of its inherent power, this Court may issue

This is an appeal from a denial of the plaintiffs' Rule 60(b)(6), Ala.R.Civ.P., motion. We affirm. I. Facts and Procedural History On March 30, 1997, Claude Wood and Camille Witt were the victims of an attack that occurred at a Taco Mac Restaurant in Birmingham. As a result of the attack, Wood and Witt, through their attorneys David Cromwell Johnson and J. Flint Liddon, sued C.F.J.J. Restaurant II, L.L.C., d/b/a Taco Mac Restaurant ("Taco Mac"), and two

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ April 13, 2026 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A26A1640. L. LIN WOOD et al. v. NICOLE WADE et al. In this civil action, the trial court entered a final judgment of $9,661,177 in favor of the plaintiffs. The trial court later denied L. Lin Wood’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict/motion for

RHONDA K. WOOD, Associate Justice Craig Allen Wade appeals from the denial of his pro se petition for a writ of error coram nobis. Wade alleged that his guilty plea was not voluntarily or intelligently entered because his counsel led him to believe that his sentence would be life, not life without parole. Wade has also filed a motion for an extension of time to file his brief-in-chief. This court will not permit an appeal from the d

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-1241 WILHELM I. WADE and SE’MONE M. WADE, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. IVAN I. RAMOS, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Opinion issued January 26, 2012 In The Court of Appeals For The

Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.), rendered October 16, 2012, resentencing defendant to an aggregate term of 47 years in prison, with an aggregate term of four years’ postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed. The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease *573 </

KENNETH S. HIXSON, Hot Springs, Judge. 11 This case involves a property dispute in Garland County. There are three adjoining lots located on the north side of Lake Hamilton. The appellants, Donald and Tammy Splawn,1 (“Splawns”) owned the lot on the east end. The appellee, Barbara Wade,2 (“Wade”) owned the lot on the west end. The Splawns wanted t

Courtney Hudson Goodson, Associate Justice Appellants City of Fort Smith and city directors Keith Lau, Mike Lorenz, and Andre Good (the City) appeal the circuit court's order granting appellee Bruce Wade's motion for summary judgment and finding that the City violated the open-meeting provisions of the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) when three of the city directors and the city administrator exchanged emails relating to

MANION, Circuit Judge. Arian Wade, a former police officer for the Village of Maywood, was prosecuted in Illinois state court for criminal drug conspiracy. After a jury acquitted him, he sued three other Maywood police officers and the Village alleging violations of his federal equal protection rights and asserting a state law claim for malicious prosecution. The district cour

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE DEFENDANT’S “MOTION TO STAY FILED IN ADVERSARY PROCEEDING NOS. 13-00197 & 13-00208 PENDING APPEAL” COMBINED WITH RELATED ORDERS AND NOTICE OF THE ENTRY THEREOF DAVID S. KENNEDY, Chief Judge. Introduction In each of the two above-captioned adversary proceedings the defendant/the above-named Chapter 7 debtor, B.J. Wade (“Mr. Wade”), filed a “Motion for Stay in Adv

NO. 07-07-0244-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL E MAY 27, 2008 ______________________________ BRENDA WOOD, by and through her Legal Guardian, PAUL GREEN, and BSW MANAGEMENT, LLC.,

NO. 07-07-0244-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL E MAY 27, 2008 ______________________________ BRENDA WOOD, by and through her Legal Guardian,

NO. 07-07-0244-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL E MAY 27, 2008 ______________________________ BRENDA WOOD, by and through her Legal Guardian,

WOLF, J., dissenting. The letter agreement of May 12, 1999, addressed all outstanding issues between the parties. Specifically, it addressed the issue of the purchase of the additional stock which is the basis of the present dispute between the parties. The letter was unambiguous, and it addressed this issue in a manner which was inconsistent with the terms of the alleged prior oral agreement. There is no re

ORDER Gary Wade was returned to prison for 12 more months after the district court revoked his supervised release for the second time because he failed to comply with reporting and drug-testing conditions. Wade appeals the revocation, arguing that the district court clearly erred in finding that he “refused” to submit to drug testing and, as a consequence, abused its discretion in revoking his release. We affirm. I

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William A. Wetzel, J), rendered August 25, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of sodomy in the first degree, course of sexual conduct against a child in the second degree, attempted rape in the first degree, sexual abuse in the first degree (two counts), and endangering the welfare of a child (five counts), and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 61 years, unanimously modified, on the law, to the e

311 F.Supp.2d 1045 (2004) BC SERVICES, INC. d/b/a Bonded Collection Service, Inc., a Colorado corporation, assignee Plaintiff, v. Karen A. WADE, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, Intermountain Administrators, Inc., a Montana corporation and Excelsior Youth Centers, Inc., a Colorado corporation, Third-Party Defendants. No. CIV.A. 03-K-1211. United States District Court, D. Colorado.