⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Wade v. Industrial Supply”

District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2005-03-02 · Published · cited 2× · 358 F. Supp. 2d 518; 56 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 538; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3112; 2005 WL 483154
358 F.Supp.2d 518 (2005) BIZMARK, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. INDUSTRIAL GAS & SUPPLY CO., INC., et al., Defendants. No. 2:04CV00109. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Big Stone Gap Division. March 2, 2005. *519 Joe H. Roberts, Joe H. Roberts, P.C., Wise, Virginia, for Plaintiffs. J. Scott Sexton and Ryan C
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999-07-14 · Published · cited 49× · 182 F.3d 281
182 F.3d 281 (4th Cir. 1999) JEANNETTE WADE; EDWIN WADE, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.DANEK MEDICAL, INCORPORATED; SOFAMOR, INCORPORATED; SOFAMOR-DANEK GROUP, INCORPORATED; SOFAMOR, S.N.C.; WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC, INCORPORATED, Defendants-Appellees,andAMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPEDIC SURGEONS; NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY; SCOLIOSIS RESEARCH SOCIETY; ZIMMER, INCORPORATED; DANEK CAPITAL CORPORATION; DANEK SALES CORPORATION; BUCKMAN COMPANY, INC
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999-07-14 · Published · cited 108× · 182 F.3d 281; 1999 WL 448861
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge LUTTIG wrote the opinion, in which Judge ERVIN and Judge TRAXLER joined. OPINION LUTTIG, Circuit Judge: Jeannette and Edwin Wade appeal the district court’s decision to grant summary judgment against them in this diversity action on the ground that the statute of limitations on their action wa
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2002-05-27 · Published · cited 6× · 205 F. Supp. 2d 695; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10446; 2002 WL 1271680
205 F.Supp.2d 695 (2002) Laura MADDEN, Individually and as the Personal Representative of the heirs and estate of Thomas Madden, Jr. Plaintiff, v. ABLE SUPPLY COMPANY, et al. Defendants. No. CIV.A.G-02-194. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Galveston Division. May 27, 2002. *696 *697 P
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-07-17 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00100-CV 6121526 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
McGlothurn v. Wadepublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014-05-21 · Published · cited 0× · 142 So. 3d 217; 13 La.App. 5 Cir. 759; 2014 La. App. LEXIS 1307; 2014 WL 2119157
JUDE G. GRAVOIS, Judge. [¡¡In this suit for personal injuries, plaintiff, Yvonne McGlothurn, appeals the trial *218court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants, Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc.1 (“Northrop Grumman”), its insurer, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh (“National Union”), and the alleged tort-fea
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2018-02-05 · Published · cited 0×
ORIGINAL lfn tbe Wniteb ~tates QCourt of jfeberal QCiaims No. 17-1007C FILED Filed: February 5, 2018 FEB - 5 2018 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** U.S. COURT OF TANYA V. WADE, *
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2025-09-09 · Published · cited 4× · 353 Conn. 296
************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001-01-05 · Published · cited 0× · 362 Md. 239; 764 A.2d 843; 2001 Md. LEXIS 16
ORDER PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of certiorari in the above entitled case having been granted and argued, it is this 5th day of January, 2001 ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the writ of certiorari be, and it is hereby, dismissed with costs, the petition having been improvidently granted.
District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2012-08-31 · Published · cited 2× · 892 F. Supp. 2d 1102; 2012 WL 3779201; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124294
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT SARAH EVANS BARKER, District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint [Docket No. 100], filed on November 8, 2010. Plaintiffs motion comes in response to this court’s September 22, 2010 order [Docket No. 99] dismissing the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) without prejudice. At th
Wade v. Gaitherpublic domain
District Court, D. Utah · 2009-03-06 · Published · cited 2× · 623 F. Supp. 2d 1277; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17850; 2009 WL 588090
623 F.Supp.2d 1277 (2009) Stanley L. WADE, Plaintiff, v. Randall T. GAITHER, Defendant. No. 08-CV-641-WFD. United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division. March 6, 2009. *1279 Stanley L. Wade, Florence, CO, pro se. Randall T. Gaither, Salt Lake City, UT, Robert L. Janicki, Stuart H. Schultz, Strong & Hanni, Sa
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2013-11-21 · Published · cited 0×
NO. 12-11-00397-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS CARL WADE CURRY, § APPEAL FROM THE 7TH APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2021-05-13 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued May 13, 2021 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-20-00395-CV ——————————— DARLING HOMES OF TEXAS, LLC, Appellant V. WADE & ALMA KHOURY; EARL & ROSE MCDONALD; MATTHEW & SANDRA NOVAK; JOHN &
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017-04-18 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2015-CA-00243-COA ROBERT HAMMONS, JR. APPELLANT v. C. WADE NAVARRE, II, INDIVIDUALLY AND APPELLEES D/B/A NAVARRE FABRICATION, INC., NAVARRE FABRICATION, INC., VELCON FILTERS, LLC, KNAPPCO CORPORATION AND WILDEN PUMP AND ENGINEERING, LLC DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/31/2014 TRIAL JUD
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2015-09-24 · Published · cited 0× · 238 Ariz. 270; 359 P.3d 1014; 722 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 19; 2015 Ariz. App. LEXIS 204
OPINION BROWN, Judge: ¶ 1 This is a special action review of an Industrial Commission of Arizona (“ICA”) award setting an average monthly wage. The question we address is whether the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) erroneously found that employee Slawomir Wozniak’s work as a ballet dancer was “seasonal” and thus improperly relied on an expanded wage base
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995-04-25 · Published · cited 15× · 658 A.2d 358; 441 Pa. Super. 598; 1995 Pa. Super. LEXIS 991
441 Pa. Superior Ct. 598 (1995) 658 A.2d 358 Joyce D. OLSON, Executrix of the Estate of David A. Olson, Appellee, v. NORTH AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY, INC. and Thomas E. Jones, Appellants. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued March 1, 1995. Filed April 25, 1995. *602 John R. Fernan, Ridgway, for appellan
District Court, N.D. New York · 2009-10-27 · Published · cited 17× · 686 F. Supp. 2d 174; 70 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 319; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99831; 2009 WL 3629674
686 F.Supp.2d 174 (2010) Dennis WADE; Denise Wade; and Motorists Mutual Insurance Co., Plaintiffs, v. TIFFIN MOTORHOMES, INC., Defendant. No. 5:05-CV-1458 (GTS/GJD). United States District Court, N.D. New York. October 27, 2009. *178 Cozen O'Connor, Georgia S. Foerstner, Esq., of Counsel, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiffs.
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco) · 2015-04-30 · Published · cited 3× · 463 S.W.3d 243; 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 4505; 2015 WL 1967829
OPINION REX D. DAVIS, Justice The events and the summary-judgment evidence relevant to this appeal are set forth in the following timeline: • December 20, 2011: Appellant Veronica Nancarrow sued Appellee Wade W. Whitmer, M.D., alleging medical negligence during her shoulder surgery.
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2013-03-26 · Published · cited 0× · 232 Ariz. 36; 301 P.3d 202; 657 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 15; 2013 WL 1209618; 2013 Ariz. App. LEXIS 42
OPINION JOHNSEN, Judge. ¶ 1 This is a special action review of an award by the Industrial Commission of Arizona denying a claimant’s request for reimbursement of expenses he incurred traveling to receive out-of-town medical treatment to which he was entitled under Arizona’s workers’ compensation law. We affirm the Commission’s rejection of the claim as untimely for failure to comply with the 24-month deadline
Wade v. Statepublic domain
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2001-09-20 · Published · cited 9× · 802 So. 2d 1023; 2001 WL 1106013
802 So.2d 1023 (2001) Deanna WADE v. STATE of Mississippi. No. 2000-KA-00565-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. September 20, 2001. Rehearing Denied January 10, 2002 *1024 Robert B. McDuff, Jackson, for Appellant. Office of the Attorney General by Charles W. Maris, Jr., for Appellee. Before PITTMAN,