Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 24-1390 DAVID DAOUD WRIGHT, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. DANIEL W. MARTIN, Warden, Wyatt Detention Facility, Defendant, Appellee, JOHN DOE 1-3, Defendants. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT

* * * * * * * * * * * The Full Commission reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before the Deputy Commissioner and the briefs and argument of the parties. The appealing party has not shown good ground to receive further evidence or rehear the parties or their representatives. Upon completion of its review, the Full Commission affirms the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner, with minor modifications.

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FOUR STATE OF MISSOURI, ) No. ED111602 ) Respondent, ) ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of vs. ) Clark County

674 S.W.2d 238 (1984) Marie WRIGHT and Adelbert Wright, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Ethel M. MARTIN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 13404. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. July 9, 1984. Motion for Rehearing Overruled and to Transfer Denied July 31, 1984. Application to Transfer Denied September 11, 1984.

[Cite as Martin v. Taylor, 2021-Ohio-4614.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY JAMES W. MARTIN, III, CASE NO. 2021-L-046 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF NANCY J. MARTIN, Civil Appeal from the DECEASED, Court of Common Pleas Plaintiff-Appellant,

JOSEPHINE LINKER HART, Associate Justice Appellant Mark Martin ("Secretary Martin"), in his official capacity as Secretary of State, and appellant-intervenor Randy Zook ("Zook"), individually and on behalf of legislative question committee, Arkansans for Jobs and Justice, appeal the September 6, 2018 order from the Pulaski County Circuit Court. The circuit court's order entered a declaratory judgment finding that Senate Joint Resol

OPINION OF THE COURT James D. Pagones, J. Defendants move for an order, pursuant to CPLR 3215, granting them a default judgment against the plaintiff on the grounds that the plaintiff has failed to reply to defendants’ counterclaims. Plaintiff cross-moves for an order, pursuant to CPLR 3012 (d), extending his time to reply to defendants’ counterclaims and compelling defendants to accept service of said reply

COURTNEY HUDSON GOODSON, Associate Justice The petitioner, Jim Knight, individually and on behalf of Citizens for Local Choice (CLC), brings this original action to challenge the sufficiency of the ballot title with regard to Issue No. 4, which provides for the issuance of four casino licenses in the state. By the complaint, petitioner seeks to enjoin respondent Arkansas Secretary of State Mark Martin from certifying any ballots ca

RHONDA K. WOOD, Associate Justice Petitioners Judith Stiritz, Billy Carroll Wheeler, Kenneth Ray Carney, and Bobby Gene Smith, individually and on behalf of Ensuring Arkansas' Future, filed this original action seeking to enjoin the Secretary of State Mark Martin from placing Issue Number 4, a proposed constitutional amendment concerning casino gambling, on the ballot for the general election on November 6, 2018. Petitioners claim

[Cite as State v. Martin, 2018-Ohio-1023.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ASHTABULA COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 2017-A-0051 - vs - : EDSON W. MA

KAREN KING MITCHELL, Judge. The State appeals from a judgment purportedly dismissing its information against Stephen Wright. The State contends that the trial court erred in dismissing the information because the information sufficiently states and apprises Wright of the essential elements of the charged offenses related to imitation controlled substances. Wright claims that the trial court correctly dismissed the informatio

*296Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Doris Ling-Cohan, J.), entered December 7, 2004, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained in a trip and fall on the sidewalk in front of premises allegedly owned by defendant-appellant, denied appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, and order, same court and Justice, entered July 6, 2005, which, insofar as

Cite as 2016 Ark. 337 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-16-796 CHUCK LANGE AND BILL Opinion Delivered October 13, 2016 WALMSLEY INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF COMMITTEE TO AN ORIGINAL ACTION PROTECT ARKANSAS’ VALUES/STOP CASINOS NOW PETITIONERS PETITION GRANTED; MOTION TO DISMISS DEN

ORDER PER CURIAM. Brian Wright appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion, after he was convicted of sexual abuse and false imprisonment. Wright contends the motion court clearly erred in denying post-conviction relief because defense counsel was ineffective for failing to present evidence that would have aided his credibility and provided him with a viable defense. For reasons explained in a Memoran

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION TWO STATE OF MISSOURI, ) No. ED111336 ) Respondent, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of the City of St. Louis v.

Dooley, J. ¶ 1. Defendant appeals from a final relief-from-abuse order in which the family division of the superior court concluded that plaintiff was a vulnerable adult and that defendant abused and exploited her. We affirm. ¶ 2. Plaintiff was born in November 1992. She was deaf for the first several years of her life, resulting in developmental delays that

ORDER PER CURIAM: Tiffany Wright appeals the trial court’s judgment convicting her of the class C felony of possession of a controlled substance after a bench trial. Wright claims that the trial court erred in overruling her motion to suppress and in admitting over her subsequent trial objections to incriminating evidence seized from her by police officers. Wright claims that the police officers did not have

*395 ORDER PER CURIAM. Shante Wright appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered after a jury convicted him as a persistent drug offender and as a prior and persistent offender of second degree trafficking. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprude

NO. 12-17-00211-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS JIMMY D. MARTIN, § APPEAL FROM THE 3RD APPELLANT V. M. WRIGHT, PAUL SHRODE, J. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT ASSAYA, GALVESTON HOSPITAL, JOHN SEALY, PROVIDER BROVWER, AND PROVIDER ASOMEBAWG, APPELLEES