Cases

ACCEPTED 15-25-00088-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/20/2025 6:36 PM

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE OCIMUM BIOSOLUTIONS (INDIA) LIMITED and DON A. BESKRONE, Chapter 7 Trustee of Ocimum Biosolutions Inc., V. C.A. No. N15C-08-168 AML CCLD ASTRAZENECA UK LIMITED, ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendant. ) OPINION Submitted: September 23, 2019 Decided: December 4, 2019 Corrected and Public Version: December 10, 2019 Upon Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment Based on the Statute of Limitations: GRANTED. Kevin S. Mann, Esquire, Michael L.

USCA4 Appeal: 25-1056 Doc: 126 Filed: 03/31/2026 Pg: 1 of 70 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-1054 PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. JOHN B. MCCUSKEY, in his offic

Opinion & Order BARBARA S. JONES, District Judge. *387TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION. CO CO o I. The Parties. CO CO o II. The Patents-In-Suit. 03 05 CO A. Patent Ownership. CO CO III. The Pleadings. CO CO A. Complaint Against Mylan/Esteve.

UNDER SEAL MEMORANDUM OPINION KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge Table Of Contents I.BACKGROUND ... 69 A. Colchicine: A Drug For The Treatment Of Gout ... 69 B. FDA’s Drug Approval Framework: The Hatch-Waxman Amendments ... 71 1. NDAs, ANDAs, and 505(b)(2) NDAs ...71

639 F.Supp.2d 60 (2009) Andrea DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. GRANT PARK NURSING HOME LP, d/b/a Grant Park Care Center, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-1764 (PLF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 5, 2009. *62 W. Charles Meltmar, Cochran Firm, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Deborah Kathryn Besche, G

401 F.Supp.2d 1022 (2005) COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. ASTRA USA, INC., Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Corp., Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Burroughs Wellcome Co., Glaxo Wellcome, Inc., Pfizer, Inc., Schering-Plough Corp., Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Inc., Zeneca, Inc., ZLB Behring LLC, and Does 1 through 100, inclusi

428 F.Supp.2d 1029 (2006) COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. ASTRA UNITED STATES, INC.; Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP; Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Bayer Corp.; Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.; Pfizer, Inc.; Schering-Plough Corp.; SmithKline Beecham Corp., d/b/a Glaxosmithkline; Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.; Wyeth, Inc.; Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Zeneca, Inc.; ZLB Behring LLC; Cardinal

TIMOTHY J. CORRIGAN, United States District Judge In this § 1983 civil rights and state wrongful death case, the Court must determine whether a law enforcement officer who prevents civilian bystanders from performing CPR on a suicidal teenager without explanation, is nonetheless entitled to qualified and statutory immunity. After Plaintiff Jolene Waldron's fourteen-year-old son, Anthony Ybarra, Jr., hung himself, neighbors and famil

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SARIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Defendants have moved to dismiss the Amended Complaint filed by the County of Suffolk in New York in this multi-district litigation involving allegations of fraud against various pharmaceutical companies.1 Suffolk alleges that Defendant pharmaceutical manufacturers have fraudulently inflated th

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.' The Food and Drug Administration has approved the use of Depakote (divalproex sodium) to treat seizures, migraine headaches, and some conditiohs associated with bipolar' disordér. Physicians are free to prescribe it to treat other conditions, called off-label uses, but a drug’s manufacturer can promote it only as suitable for us

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY STANLEY R. WIERCINSKI, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) BRESCIA PROPERTIES, LLC, ) C.A. No. N11C-12-015 ) Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SARIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The question raised in these related remand motions is whether a new Supreme Court decision can be an “order or other paper from which it may first be ascertained” that a case is removable under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b). Plaintiffs Illinois, Kentucky and New York brought these seven actions in various state courts alleging t

*194MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SARIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The States of Montana and Nevada allege that pharmaceutical manufacturers fraudulently overstate the published “average wholesale prices” (“AWP’s”) of many of their prescription drugs to the detriment of the States, which reimburse providers based on AWP’s, and their ci

06/06/2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON September 11, 2024 Session SAINT CLAUDE RENEL, ET AL. v. DREXEL CHEMICAL COMPANY Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-1758-23 Mary L. Wagner, Judge ___________________________________

DECISION AND ORDER DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, Gradient Enterprises, Inc. (“Gradient”), a New York corporation, commenced this patent infringement action against defendant Skype Technologies S.A. (“Skype S.A.”) and Skype, Inc., which are, respectively, a foreign corporation based in Luxembourg and a Delaware corporation with a principal place of

KAPLAN, District Judge: In 2005, plaintiff Christina L. Bazemore applied on the Internet for a credit card issued by First Bank of Delaware (“FBD”). She charged several items on the card but failed to pay in full. In 2008, Jefferson Capital System, LLC (“JSC”) acquired all right, title and interest to Ms. Bazemore’s account. Eventually, Ms. Baze-more sued JSC for an alleged viol

DECISION AND ORDER DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge. INTRODUCTION On December 21, 2010, plaintiff Gradient Enterprises, Inc. (“Gradient”) filed this patent infringement action against Skype, Inc. and Skype Technologies S.A. (“Skype, S.A.”). Defendants (who are both represented by the same counsel) have separately moved to dismiss *

662 F.3d 908 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Benjamin MUOGHALU, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-3873. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued September 30, 2011. Decided November 21, 2011. *909 Tony U. Iweagwu, Jr. (argued), Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Chica

ORDER LISA GODBEY WOOD, CHIEF JUDGE This matter comes before the Court on six Motions to Dismiss filed by the several Defendant airlines: Delta Air Lines, Inc. (“Delta”) (dkt. no. 88)1; ABC Aerolíneas, S.A. de C.V. (“Interjet”) (dkt. no. 89); United Airlines, Inc. (“United”) (dkt. no. 93); Concesionaria Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S.A.P.I. de C.V. (‘Volaris”) (dkt. no. 97); A