Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “WOLFE v. ASTRAZENECA LP”
AstraZeneca LP v. Breath Ltd.public domain
REDACTED OPINION (PUBLIC) BUMB, District Judge. Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION.333 II. BACKGROUND. CO CO A. The Asserted Claims of the '834 Patent. CO CO B. Markman Hearing. CO CO ^ C. Federal Circuit Decision. CO CO D. Remand Proceedings. CO CO E. Defendants’ Sterilization Process
Astrazeneca AB v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM Sue L. Robinson, United States District Judge At Wilmington this 6th day of November, 2015, having reviewed the papers filed in connection with plaintiffs motion for a temporary restraining order, and having heard oral argument on same, the court issues its decision to grant the motion, for the reasons that follow: 1. Background.1 Since 1989, the
Pieczenik v. Bayer Corp.public domain
ON MOTION PER CURIAM. ORDER The Defendants-Appellees move to dismiss George Pieczenik’s appeals. Pieczen-ik opposes. Pieczenik has appealed from orders denying his motion “in limine to expunge plaintiffs copyright lecture proffered by defendants’ counsel and to charge them with digital copyright infringement,” denying his motion for mediation, and his motion fo
Mokkapati v. Mayorkaspublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ADITYA MOKKAPATI, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 21-cv-1195 (BAH) ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, et al., Defendants.
Minerva Surgical, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc.public domain
Case: 21-2246 Document: 58 Page: 1 Filed: 02/15/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MINERVA SURGICAL, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. HOLOGIC, INC., CYTYC SURGICAL PRODUCTS, LLC, Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2021-2246 ____________________
DiStefano v. KW Solar Solutions, Inc.public domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DOMENIC P. DISTEFANO and ) DEBRA DISTEFANO ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Vv. ) ) KW SOLAR SOLUTIONS, INC., ) C.A. No. N16C-11-015 CLS and DALE WOLF, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) Date Submitted: March 15, 2019 Date Decided: June 27, 2019 Upon Defendants KW Solar Solutions, Inc., and Dale Wolf’s Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs’ Expert DENIED. Blake A. Bennett, Esquire, Christopher H. Lee, Esquire, Cooch and Taylor, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware, Attorney for Plainti
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NICOLE PILEGGI, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 23-345 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell WASHINGTON NEWSPAPER PUBLISHING COMPANY, LLC, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Nicole Pileggi br
Stoll, Circuit Judge. Exmark Manufacturing Company filed suit against Briggs & Stratton Power Products Group, LLC in the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska, alleging infringement of, inter alia, claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 5,987,863. The district court entered summary judgment that claim 1 was not invalid because the claim su
General Mills, Inc. v. Kraft Foods Global, Inc.public domain
495 F.3d 1378 (2007) GENERAL MILLS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KRAFT FOODS GLOBAL, INC., Defendant-Cross Appellant. Nos. 2006-1569, 2006-1606. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. July 31, 2007. Ronald J. Schutz, Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P., of Minneapolis, MN, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was, David P. Swenson,
Reeder v. Carterpublic domain
Factual and Procedural Background The ISP Recruit Academy located in Plainfield, Indiana conducts an annual, limited duration program to train recruits who aspire to become State Troopers. Mr. Reeder, as part of his effort to become a State Trooper, enrolled in ISP's 74th class, which ran from July 21, 2014 to December 23, 2014. Deposition of Zachary Parker, Dkt. No. 37-1 ("Parker Dep.") at 2. Acad
Prakazrel Michel v. NYP Holdings, Inc.public domain
MARCUS, Circuit Judge: , In this defamation case, well-known rapper and philanthropist Prakazrel (“Pras”) Michel challenges the truth of an article published about him in the New York Post’s Page Six gossip column. The article claimed that Michel had failed to perform as expected as. the headliner at a 9/11 charity event for the Hope for Them Foundation with
Mudd v. City of New Havenpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER William C. Lee, Judge, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana This matter is before the court on the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants City of New Haven, Indiana, and Officer James Krueger on April 18, 2016 (DE 30). Plaintiff James Mudd filed a response in opposition to the motion on May 12, 2016 (DE 35) and Defendants filed a reply brief on May 23, 2016 (DE 36). For
*186 WRIGHT, J. This appeal rises from the judgment of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County in favor of the appellee-plaintiff, Mirowski Family Ventures, LLC (“MFV”), 1 against appellant-defendan
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Navarropublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER William C. Lee, Judge, United States District Court Northern District of Indiana This matter is before the Court on the motion for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff J & J Sports Productions, Inc., on November 21, 2016 (docket entry 17). Defendants Leonor and Sergio Navarro, d/b/a La Santa Anita Family Grill, filed a response in opposition to the motion on December 13 (DE 19)
Aspen Am. Ins. Co. v. Interstate Warehousing, Inc.public domain
William C. Lee, Judge U.S. District Court This matter is before the Court on cross-motions for partial summary judgment. Defendant Interstate Warehousing filed its "Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to the Enforceability of the Limitation of Liability Contract Clause and Plaintiff's Spoliation of Evidence Claims" on August 29, 2018 (ECF 35), to which Plaintiff Aspen American Insurance filed a response on October 29, 2018 (ECF 4
McComas v. Brickleypublic domain
819 F.Supp.2d 852 (2011) Shannon McCOMAS, Plaintiff, v. Edward BRICKLEY, Defendant. No. 1:09-cv-1540-SEB-MJD. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. May 13, 2011. *853 Jeffrey S. McQuary, Brown Tompkins Lory, Indianapolis, IN, for Plaintiff. Alexander Phillip Will, Jennifer Lynn Haley, Office of
Jackson v. Allstate Insurancepublic domain
780 F.Supp.2d 781 (2011) Paul A. JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. 4:09-cv-120-SEB-WGH. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, New Albany Division. January 28, 2011. *782 Harry B. O'Donnell, IV, Louisville, KY, for Plaintiff. Michael B. Knight, Patrick Joseph Dietrick, Thomas David Coll
Jackson v. Verizon Wirelesspublic domain
676 F.Supp.2d 728 (2009) Ronald JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. VERIZON WIRELESS, Defendant. No. 1:08-cv-806-SEB-JMS. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. October 28, 2009. *730 Joel Samuel Paul, Indianapolis, IN, for Plaintiff. Bonnie L. Martin, Brandon M. Shelton, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak &
Carolina Casualty Insurance v. Estate of Studerpublic domain
(2008) Forward Air, Inc., Counter-Claimant, v. Carolina Casualty Insurance Company, Counter-Defendant. No. 106-cv-1740-SEB-JMS. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. May 14, 2008. ENTRY GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SARAH EVANS BARKER, District Judge. This cause is be
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ENVOLVE PHARMACY SOLUTIONS, ) INC., ET AL., ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N19C-12-214 ) PRW CCLD ) RITE AID HDQTRS. CORP., ) and RITE AID CORP., ) Defendants. )