Cases

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CASPER, Judge. I. Introduction Petitioner James Gaines (“Gaines”) has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus (“Petition”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 based upon five constitutional grounds. D. I. Gaines has moved to stay the Petition to allow him to return to state court and exhaust certain of his claims. D. 21. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________________ No. 21-1918 _______________________ LAWRENCE GAINES v. SUPERINTENDENT BENNER TOWNSHIP SCI; DISTRICT ATTORNEY NORTHAMPTON COUNTY; ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, Appellants _______________________ On Appeal fro

Opinion filed July 15, 2021 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-19-00266-CV __________ PETER KLASSEN, Appellant V. GAINES COUNTY, TEXAS, AND GAINES COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFFS KEN KETRON AND CLINT LOW, Appellees

*402OPINION FELIPE REYNA, Justice. Roger Kelly filed suit against Appellees after Southwest Guaranty Mortgage Corp. faded to fund a $2,010,000 loan to Kelly for which it had previously issued a loan commitment. The trial court granted several summary judgment motions filed by Ap-pellees and rendered a take-nothing judgment in their favor. Kelly conten

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS <

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS <

943 S.W.2d 185 (1997) Steven W. WILLIAMS and Gaines Insulation Company, Inc., Appellants, v. Sally GAINES, Appellee. No. 07-96-0156-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo. April 4, 1997. Rehearing Overruled May 6, 1997. *186 Gibson Ochsner & Adkins, L.L.P., David L. LeBas, S. Tom Morris, Amarillo, for appell

Revised April 29, 2002 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _______________________ No. 00-51328 _______________________ In The Matter Of: WILLIAM L. MILLER, Debtor. ____________________ GAINES WEST, Chapter 7 Trustee,

888 S.W.2d 504 (1994) Mack Henry GAINES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 08-93-00297-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso. October 6, 1994. *506 Mark Ellis, Houston, for appellant. John B. Holmes, Dist. Atty. of Harris County, Houston, for State. Before KOEHLER, LARSON and McCOLLUM, JJ.

998 F.Supp. 91 (1998) David GAINES, Frank Poindexter, John T. Smith, and Edwin Torres, Plaintiffs, v. BOSTON HERALD, INC., Defendant. No. CIV.A. 95-11946-NG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. March 30, 1998. *92 *93 *94

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: The issue in this case is whether a corporate officer is entitled to indemnification under Delaware law for acts committed for his own benefit before he was employed by the corporation. Affirming the decisions of the bankruptcy and district courts in the narrow circumstances presented, we hold that he is not so entitled, because he was not sued “by

104 U.S. 386 (____) DAVIS v. GAINES. Supreme Court of United States. Mr. J.D. Rouse for the appellant. Mr. John S. Whitaker, contra. *387 MR. JUSTICE WOODS delivered the opinion of the court. This was a bill in equity filed by Myra Clark Gaines, the appellee, against Minor Kenner, the intestate of Eliza Davis, the appellant,

65 U.S. 553 (____) 24 How. 553 MYRA CLARK GAINES, APPELLANT, v. DUNCAN N. HENNEN. Supreme Court of United States. *555 It was argued by Mr. Cushing and Mr. Perin for the appellant, and Mr. Janin and Mr. Hennen for the appellee. *556 Mr. Justice WAYNE delivered the opinion of the

Mr. Justice WAYNE delivered the following dissenting opinion. I dissent from the judgment just given, and will give my reasons for doing so as briefly as I can. But it will necessarily occupy some time. I believe that the case of the complainant has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, as the law requires it to be done; I say. as the law requir

SMITH, P. J. The plaintiff and defendant are both business corporations, the former, organized under the statute of this State and the latter under that of the State of Kentucky. The plaintiff in its petition alleged, (1), that it was and is the owner of a special trade-mark for “Old Crow” whiskey, which defendant had infringed and was infringing; and (2), that by the use of the words “Old Crow” upon bottles containing whiskey ot

422 F.3d 908 BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION, Petitioner,City of Tacoma; Port of Seattle; Coral Power, L.L.C.; Constellation Energy Commodities Group, Inc., Intervenors,v.FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent,PacifiCorp, Respondent-Intervenor.Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.; Dynegy Power Marketing, Inc.; Duke Energy North America, LLC, Duke Energy Trading and Marketing, LLC, (Collectively, "Duke Energy"); El

RAYMOND R. ABRAMSON, Judge James Randall Amason, Sr., appeals following the Union County Circuit Court's entry of summary judgment on his declaratory-judgment action in favor of the City of Calion, Arkansas (the City). On appeal, Amason argues that the circuit court erred by (1) finding that he was procedurally barred from asserting the declaratory-judgment action; (2) concluding that there were no genuine issues of material fact; a

Chief Justice Hecht delivered the opinion of the Court. This is a health care liability claim for the tragic death of Yolanda Iris Flores. The Texas Medical Liability Act (“the Act”) 1 imposes a threshold requirement that the plaintiff furnish what we have described as “a statement of opinion by an

131 S.W.3d 670 (2004) BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION et al., Appellants, v. Juan Macias LOPEZ, et al., Appellees. No. 13-02-526-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi-Edinburg. April 1, 2004. Rehearing Overruled May 6, 2004. *676 Burgain G. Hayes, Trek C. Doyle, John R. Jones, Delgado, Acosta, Braden, Jones &

OPINION & ORDER KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge. Irma Y. Drace (“Drace”), Dhyalma N. Vazquez (“Vazquez”), Sam Zherka (“Zher-ka”), and Dr. Giulio Cavallo (“Cavallo”) (collectively, the “Individual Plaintiffs”), and The Westchester County Independence Party (the “Independence Party” or the “Party”) (together, with the Individual Plaintiffs, “Plaintiffs”) bring suit against 90 Defendants, under