Cases

OPINION HURWITZ, Circuit Judge: This case arises out of the 2012 merger of two health care providers in Nampa, Idaho. The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) and the State of Idaho sued, alleging that the merger violated § 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18, and state law; two local hospitals filed a similar complaint. Although the district court believed th

390 F.Supp.2d 643 (2005) April GRANT, Velisia Legrand and Robert Houle, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. TRINITY HEALTH-MICHIGAN, Trinity Health Corporation, and John Does 1 thru 10, Defendants. No. 04-CV-72734-DT. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. September 30, 2005.

364 F.Supp.2d 1046 (2005) Dwight L. QUINN, Freida Eyster Martin, and David W. Kuneman, Plaintiffs, v. BJC HEALTH SYS., Barnes-Jewish Hospital, American Hospital Ass'n Defendants. No. 4:04CV00768 ERW. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division. March 1, 2005. *1047 *1048 Anth

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued March 24, 2017 Decided April 28, 2017 No. 17-5024 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., APPELLEES v. ANTHEM, INC., APPELLANT CIGNA CORPORATION, APPELLANT Consolidated with 17-5028 Appeals f

[Cite as Webster v. Altenloh Brinck & Co., U.S., Inc., 2021-Ohio-1072.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WILLIAMS COUNTY Teresa M. Webster Court of Appeals No. WM-20-001 Appellant Trial Court No. 18CI000120 v. Altenloh Brinck & Co., U.S., Inc., et al. DECISI

OPINION ROBINSON, Senior District Judge I. INTRODUCTION The Department of Justice, Antitrust Division (the “government”), seeks to enjoin Rockwell Holdco, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary Energy Solutions, Inc. (“Energy Solutions”) from acquiring Andrews County Holding, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary Waste Control Specialists LLC (‘WCS,” and collectively with the other defend

731 N.W.2d 184 (2007) 2007 SD 34 Sherry B. NYGAARD, On Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SIOUX VALLEY HOSPITALS & HEALTH SYSTEM, Defendant and Appellee. Robert Dosch, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Avera Health, Defendant and Appellee. Brett and Debra Burgher, On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Simila

MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge Anthem and Cigna, the nation’s second and third largest medical health insurance carriers, have agreed to merge. They propose to create the single largest seller of medical healthcare coverage to large commercial accounts, in a market in which there are only four national carriers still sta

MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION .. .8 BACKGROUND.. .9 I. The Parties and Proposed Merger... 9 II. Original Medicare and Medicare Advantage.. .11 III. The Public Exchanges... 16 IV. Procedural History...

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: This antitrust case involves allegedly anticompetitive conduct in the ductile iron pipe fittings (“DIPF”) market by McWane, Inc., a family-run company headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama. In 2009, following the passage of federal legislation that provided a large infusion of money for waterworks projects that required domestic pipe fittings, Star Pipe Produ

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge. Delta Air Lines, Inc. (“Delta”) and Northwest Airlines, Inc. (“Northwest”) merged in 2008. Prior to the merger, Northwest flight attendants were unionized, and Delta flight attendants were not. Delta flight attendants were also paid better than Northwest flight attendants. In 2010, all of Delta’s flight attendants— includin

344 F.Supp.2d 1097 (2004) DEFIANCE HOSPITAL, INC., et al., Plaintiffs v. FAUSTER-CAMERON, INC., et al., Defendants No. 3:01 CV 7578. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. November 17, 2004. *1103 Amy N. Natyshak, Marshall & Melhorn, Toledo, OH, David Marx, Jr., McDermott, Will & Emery, Chicago, IL, Jo

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0280p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ ACADEMY OF ALLERGY & ASTHMA IN PRIMARY CARE, │

363 F.Supp.2d 867 (2005) Melissa Michelle VALENCIA and Sheketar Crear, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. MISSISSIPPI BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER, INC., Mississippi Baptist Health Systems, Inc., and the American Hospital Association, Defendants. No. CIV.A. 3:04-CV-628BN. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division. March 29

410 F.Supp.2d 1224 (2005) Miriam SABETA, et al., Plaintiffs v. BAPTIST HOSPITAL OF MIAMI, INC., et al., Defendants No. 04-21437CIV-JORDAN. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. Miami Division. February 23, 2005. *1225 *1226 *1227 Miguel Manuel de la O

DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY {¶ 1} This is an appeal from the judgment of the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas which granted the motion for summary judgment filed by appellees, Toledo Heart Surgeons, Inc., and Xavier Mousset, M.D. (collectively referred to as "Dr. Mousset"), against The Toledo Hospital and ProMedica Health System, Inc. (collectively referred to as "the hospital"), on its counterclaims alleg

[Cite as Bordenkircher v. Baker, 2023-Ohio-1770.] COURT OF APPEALS COSHOCTON COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TESSA BORDENKIRCHER JUDGES: Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee Hon. William B. Hoffman, J. Hon. P

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 664 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 665 {¶ 1} This is an appeal from a judgment of the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas granting summary judgm

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

OPINION OF THE COURT FISHER, Circuit Judge. At issue in this case is the proposed merger of the two largest hospitals in the Harrisburg, Pennsylvania area: Penn State Hershey Medical Center and Pinnacle-Health System. The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) opposes their merger and filed an administrative complaint alleging that it violates Section 7 of the