⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

2 opinions for “WENZEL v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.”

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024-07-01 · Published · cited 21× · 106 F.4th 609
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-2842 PAULA WALLRICH, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INCORPORATED and SAM- SUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY, LIMITED, Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ App
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019-03-22 · Published · cited 24× · 368 F. Supp. 3d 901
As to Plain Green, Plaintiffs allege that the Haynes Defendants, in conjunction with other actors and through a web of entities, actually "funded and partially operated" the so-called "rent-a-tribe" scheme at the heart of this case. (Compl. ¶ 2.) Specifically, the Haynes Defendants and *909several non-tribal actors entered into a term sheet in support of the unlawful t