Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “WEBER v. 3M COMPANY”
Weber v. Life Insurance Co. of North Americapublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION NORMAN K. MOON, District Judge. This action arises out of the decision by Defendant Life Insurance Company of North America (“Defendant” or “LINA”) to deny benefits claimed by Plaintiff Catherine Weber (“Plaintiff” or “Ms. Weber”) under two Accidental Death and Dismemberment (“AD & D”) policies of insurance issued by LINA and carried by her deceased husband, Carl Weber
Weber, Inc. v. Provisur Technologies, Inc.public domain
Case: 22-1751 Document: 95 Page: 1 Filed: 02/08/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ WEBER, INC., Appellant v. PROVISUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellee ______________________ 2022-1751, 2022-1813 ______________________ Appeals from the United Stat
Weber, Inc. v. Provisur Technologies, Inc.public domain
Case: 22-1751 Document: 95 Page: 1 Filed: 02/08/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ WEBER, INC., Appellant v. PROVISUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellee ______________________ 2022-1751, 2022-1813 ______________________ Appeals from the United Stat
Southern Grouts & Mortars, Inc. v. 3M Co.public domain
575 F.3d 1235 (2009) SOUTHERN GROUTS & MORTARS, INC., a Florida corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. 3M COMPANY, a Foreign corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 08-15850. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. July 23, 2009. *1238 Gustavo Sardina, Frank Herrera, JanPaul Guzman, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, Ft.
United Phosphorus, Ltd. v. Angus Chemical Companypublic domain
322 F.3d 942 UNITED PHOSPHORUS, LTD., an Indian corporation; Shroff's United Chemicals, Ltd., an Indian corporation; and J.C. Miller & Associates, Incorporated, an Illinois corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.ANGUS CHEMICAL COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; Angus Chemie GmbH, a German corporation; the Estate of Freeman Hughes through its representative Yvonne Hughes; Ollie W. Chandler; Lowell Pals; Gary W. Granzow; D.B. Gupta; and Lupin
E. I. DuPont de Nemours and Company v. Glen Strongpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2006-CA-01005-SCT E. I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY v. GLEN STRONG AND CONNIE STRONG DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/17/2006 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. BILLY JOE LANDRUM COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: JONES COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: JOHN G. CORLEW DEBORAH DEROCHE KUCHLER
NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge. These consolidated appeals involve two patents, in the field of bonded magnets, owned by Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (3M). Walter S. Blume and the Electrodyne Company (defendants) appeal from judgments holding that Blume infringed 3M’s U. S. Patent No. 2,999,275 (275 patent) and t
New Jersey Wood Finishing Company v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, and Essexwire Corp.public domain
MCLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge. This is an interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) from a denial of a defense motion to dismiss based on the statute of limitations. Plaintiff-appellee is the New Jersey Wood Finishing Company (N. J. Wood),
139 F.Supp.2d 1109 (2001) MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, and Riker Laboratories, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. BARR LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant. Alphapharm Pty. Ltd., Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. Barr Laboratories, Inc., Defendant. No. 00-2022 MJD FLN. United States District Court, D. Minnesota. April 17, 2001. *1110
Castillo-Sayre v. Citarella Operating LLCpublic domain
Castillo-Sayre v Citarella Operating LLC (2021 NY Slip Op 03906) Castillo-Sayre v Citarella Operating LLC 2021 NY Slip Op 03906 Decided on June 17, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State L
Cacoilo v. Sherwin-Williams Co.public domain
OPINION HILLMAN, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court: by way of Plaintiffs’ motion [Doc. No. 89] to remand this case to the Superior Court of New Jersey for Camden County pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). Defendants oppose Plaintiffs’ motion to remand. The Court has considered the parties’ submissions, and decides this matter pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78.
Madden v. Able Supply Co.public domain
205 F.Supp.2d 695 (2002) Laura MADDEN, Individually and as the Personal Representative of the heirs and estate of Thomas Madden, Jr. Plaintiff, v. ABLE SUPPLY COMPANY, et al. Defendants. No. CIV.A.G-02-194. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Galveston Division. May 27, 2002. *696 *697 P
Gilbert v. Gilbertpublic domain
IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) GILBERT V. GILBERT NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY NEB. CT. R. APP. P. § 2-102(E). SUSANNAH J. GILBERT, NOW KNOWN AS SUSANNAH J. DE FEO, APPELLANT, V.
Rebernick v. Wausau General Insurancepublic domain
LOUIS B. BUTLER, JR., J. ¶ 40. (dissenting). The majority concludes that American Family was required to notify the Rebernicks of the availability of Underinsured Motorists (UIM) coverage under their umbrella policy pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 632.32(4m). Majority op., ¶ 2.1 agree with this conclusion and join that portion of the opinion. ¶ 41. However, I disagree with the majority's determination that American Family p
United States v. Chrysler Corp.public domain
157 F.Supp.2d 849 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff(s), v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, et al., Defendant(s). No. 597CV894. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. September 4, 2001. *850 *851 Arthur I. Harris, Office of the United States Attorney, Northern District of Ohi
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RAMCELL, INC., ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2019-0601-PAF ) ALLTEL CORPORATION d/b/a VERIZON ) WIRELESS, ) )
United States v. Chrysler Corp.public domain
168 F.Supp.2d 754 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff(s), v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, et al., Defendant(s). No. 5:97CV894. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. September 25, 2001. *755 *756 *757 *758</
La Salle National Bank v. Malikpublic domain
705 N.E.2d 938 (1999) 302 Ill. App.3d 236 235 Ill.Dec. 755 LA SALLE NATIONAL BANK, n/k/a La Salle National Bank, N.A., as Trustee, Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, v. Carlyn J. MALIK, Indiv., et al., Defendants and Counterplaintiffs (Carlyn J. Malik et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants and Cross-Appellees; Kiannosh Jafari et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellees; Swissler Brothers Plumbing, Inc.
Thomas D. Nowell v. City of Wausaupublic domain
ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J. ¶ 1. The Petitioner, City of Wausau, seeks review of a published court of appeals decision that reversed a judgment entered by the circuit court affirming the City's decision not to renew Thomas and Suporn Nowell's Class B alcohol license. 1 The court of appeals determined that the circuit court had empl
Haase v. Badger Mining Corp.public domain
266 Wis.2d 970 (2003) 2003 WI App 192 669 N.W.2d 737 Laverne HAASE, Plaintiff-Appellant,[] Larry BRAATZ, Norb Braun, Fidel Castillo, Gregory Ebel, Lawrence Ferge, Leon Fuerst, Carol Guyette, Estate of Ray Guyette, David Hamilton, Floyd Hanson, Jerald Heuer, Daniel Janiak, Rick Knudsen, Wesley Kupsky, Sr., James Mohrman, James Maroney, Terry Olejnik, Robert Parry, Donald Quaintance, Delores R