Cases

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Rita Joyce Glenn, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Thomas Harold Glenn, deceased, Respondent, v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co.; Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to Buffalo Pumps; Airgas USA, LLC; Aurora Pump; BW/IP Inc., a Subsidiary of Flowserve Corporation; CBS Corporation, a Delaware Corporation f/k/a Viacom, Inc., Success

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 3M COMPANY Plaintiff, C.A. NO.: N18C-07-089 AML CCLD Vv. NEOLOGY, INC. and ONE EQUITY PARTNERS VI, L.P., New Newer Neer” Nee Nee Nee Nee ree” Nee eee” Defendants. Submitted: March 25, 2019 Decided: June 28, 2019 Upon Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Defendant Neology, Inc.’s First Amended Counterclaim: Granted in Part, Denied in Part MEMORANDUM OPINION Rafael X. Zahralddin-Aravena, Esquire, Jonathan M. Stemerman, Esquire of ELLIOTT GREENLEAF,

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT L. WILKINS, District Judge. Plaintiff 3M Company (“3M”) has sued Defendants Lanny J. Davis, Lanny J. Davis & Associates, PLLC, Davis-Block LLC (collectively the “Davis Defendants”), and Harvey Boulter, Porton Capital Technology Funds, Porton Capital, Inc. (collectively the “Porton Defendants”) for a number of claim

*158ORDER DAVID W. DANIEL, United States Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant Florida Power & Light Company’s (“FP & L”) motion to compel Plaintiffs’1 production of certain unredacted documents [CP & L DE-559; Consol DE-556]. Plaintiffs have responded [CP & L DE-567; Consol DE-5

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED JAMES GOODWIN, JOHN INGRAM, December 23, 2024 RAYMOND LOVEJOY, JEFFREY ALLEN, ASHLEY N. DEEM, CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK CHARLES LILLY, and RAYMOND MUNCY, INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

245 Wis.2d 163 (2001) 2001 WI 89 629 N.W.2d 140 Scott BRUNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert L. WARD, Debra Czaplewski, State Farm Mutual and Continental Casualty Company, Defendants, PROGRESSIVE NORTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. Nos. 98-3002, 98-3300. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Oral argument January 4, 2001.

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1603 CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY, Defendant – Appellant, v. GEORGIA POWER COMPANY, Defendant – Appellee, and DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC., Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc., Plaintiff, and UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY; AMERICAN ELECTRIC CORPORATIO

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1391 DOROTHY E. SMITH, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Julian Jackson Smith, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SCHLAGE LOCK COMPANY, LLC, Defendant - Appellee, and AMETEK, INC., sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Haveg

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-2705 ___________________________ Auto-Owners Mutual Insurance Company Plaintiff - Appellee v. Beverly Granger Defendant -

463 F.3d 360 HALLIBURTON COMPANY BENEFITS COMMITTEE, In Its Capacity as Plan Administrator of the Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Welfare Benefits Plan, including its constituent benefit program, the Dresser Retiree Life and Medical Program; Halliburton Co.; Halliburton Energy Services Incorporated Welfare Benefits Plan, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.James GRAVES; Phil Griffin; Paul M. Bryant, individually and as representatives of a requested

LOKEN, Chief Judge. Kenny Werdehausen had neck surgery and submitted a benefits claim under his employer’s group health plan reflected in an insurance policy issued by Benicorp Insurance Company. In reviewing the claim, Benicorp discovered that Werdehau-sen had failed to disclose the need for neck surgery in his policy enrollment application. Benicorp determined that this was a ma

*1298Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge GAJARSA. Dissenting opinion filed by Chief Judge MAYER. GAJARSA, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from the judgment issued by the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas pursuant to a jury verdict and the subsequent denial of several motions for judgment as a matter of law (“

259 F.Supp. 35 (1966) STATE OF MICHIGAN and all Related Cases Pending in the District of Minnesota, Fourth Division, Plaintiffs, v. MORTON SALT COMPANY et al., Defendants. Nos. 4-64-Civ. 423, 4-64-Civ. 422, 4-65-Civ. 1, 4-65-Civ. 197, 4-65-Civ. 388, 4-65-Civ. 398 to 4-65-Civ. 400, 4-65-Civ. 402, 4-66-Civ. 17, 4-66-Civ. 69, and 4-66-Civ. 138. United States District Court D. Minnesota, Fourth Division.</

694 F.2d 1289 111 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3078, 224 U.S.App.D.C. 314,95 Lab.Cas. P 13,878, 1982 O.S.H.D. (CCH) P 26,342 OIL, CHEMICAL & ATOMIC WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 6-418,AFL-CIO; Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers LocalUnion No. 6-75, AFL-CIO, Petitioners,v.NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent,Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., Intervenor.INTERNATIONAL CHEMICAL WORKERS UNION, LOCAL

William H. Plank, II, et al. v. James P. Cherneski, et al., Misc. No. 3, September Term, 2019, Opinion by Booth, J. FIDUCIARY DUTIES – MANAGING MEMBERS OWED TO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AND MEMBERS – AGENCY. Managing members of an LLC owe common law fiduciary duties to the LLC and to the other members based upon the fiduciary relations governing the principles of agency. BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY AS AN INDEPENDENT CAUSE OF ACTION. In Kann v. Kann, 344 Md. 689 (1997), and our jurisprudence that

1 2025 CO 39 Ralph Cantafio,

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-3157 ___________________________ Mary Triplet, as Guardian and Conservator of Margaret Triplet; Margaret Triplet Plaintiffs - Appellees v. Menard, Inc.; Barb Myers

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE VIVIAN L. MEDINILLA LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER JUDGE 500 NorTH KING STREET, SuITE 10400 WILMINGTON, DE 19801-3733 TELEPHONE (302) 255-0626 February 27, 2020 William J. Rhodunda, Jr., Esq. Jonathan M Stemerman, Esq. Nicholas G. Kondraschow, Esq. Rafael X. Zahralddin, Esq. 1220 N. Market Street, Suite 700 1105 N. Market Street, Suite 1700 Wilmington, DE 19801 Wilmington, Delaware 19801 Re: R. Keating & Sons, Inc. v. Daryl Huber, et al., Case

LOUIS B. BUTLER, JR., J. ¶ 101. (concurring in part, dissenting in part). I concur with the majority's conclusions that Acuity violated the notice provisions of Wis. Stat. § 632.32(4m) when it failed to provide notice of the availability of UIM coverage, and that the Stones' recovery for that violation is potentially set by the stipulation they entered into with Acuity. See major

MICHAEL J. GABLEMAN, J. *495 ¶ 1 A defendant who enters a guilty plea waives numerous constitutional rights. State v. Bangert , 131 Wis. 2d 246