Cases

By JUDGE THOMAS J. MIDDLETON This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Plea in Bar filed by the Defendant, McDonalds Corp., and the Motion for Leave to Amend filed by the Plaintiff, Walker. The Court finds the following facts to be applicable. The Plaintiff was allegedly injured on February 11, 1985, while at a McDonalds Restaurant in Reston, Virginia. On February 10, 1987, on

MULLINS, J. **680 The sole issue in this certified appeal is whether the Appellate Court correctly concluded that the defendant, Eugene L. Walker, failed to establish a violation of his right under the sixth amendment to the United States constitution to confront witnesses against him. Speci

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama has certified to this Court the following questions, pursuant to Rule 18, Ala.R.App.P.: "(1) Is the portion of the agreement wherein defendant agreed `to establish a practice of obstetrics and gynecology exclusively in Jasper, Alabama . . . for a period of not fewer than forty-eight (48) consecutive months' an illegal restraint on [the defendant's] profession and, to that extent, void under Alaba

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENTI. INTRODUCTIONThe plaintiff, Sharon McDonald, was arrested on an arrest warrant obtained by the defendant, Richard Walker, a detective with the Boston Police Department. The plaintiff was unable to post bail and spent eight days in jail before being released on

PER CURIAM. Before us are two sets of appeals and cross-appeals, each of which concerns Wisconsin’s law requiring voters to have qualifying photo identification. In each matter, one originating in the Eastern District of Wisconsin and the other in the Western District of Wisconsin, the plaintiffs have petitioned for initial review en banc. We have consolidated their petitions for the purposes of this order. The plaintiffs ar

DECISION AND ORDER LYNN ADELMAN, District Judge The plaintiffs, a number of individuals who are eligible to vote in Wisconsin, filed this suit in 2011, alleging that Wisconsin’s law requiring them to present photo identification at the polls, 2011 Wis. Act 23 (“Act 23”), violates the Constitution and Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. Following a trial on the claims alleged in this and a companion case,

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-CA-00675-COA JORDAN BARLOW WALKER APPELLANT v. BRADLEY RHETT HASTY APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/24/2023 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. TAMETRICE EDRICKA HODGES COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HINDS COUNTY CHANCERY

DECISION AND ORDER LYNN ADELMAN, District Judge. When the plaintiffs commenced this suit, they alleged that Wisconsin’s law requiring voters to present photo identification at the polls, 2011 Wis. Act 23 (“Act 23”), violated the Constitution and Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. Following a trial on the claims alleged in this and a companion case, I concluded that Act 23 placed an unjustified

DECISION AND ORDER LYNN ADELMAN, District Judge. In May 2011, the Wisconsin Legislature passed 2011 Wisconsin Act 23 (“Act 23”), which requires Wisconsin residents to present a document including photo identification (“photo ID”) in order to vote. 2011 Wis. Sess. Laws 104 (codified as amended in scattered sections of Wis. Stat. Ch. 5 and 6).1 The plaintiffs in the two

Concurring Opinion by McDONALD, J. which BELL, C.J. and ADKINS, J., joins. I cannot improve upon Judge Barbera’s explication of the facts or outline of the law governing this case. I write only to highlight how this Court’s decision differs from the decision of the Court of Special Appeals on the search issue. Mr. Walker had the burden of establishing that he had an act

213 P.3d 288 (2009) Maria MENDOZA, Plaintiff/Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. McDONALD'S CORPORATION, Defendant/Appellee/Cross-Appellant. No. 1 CA-CV 07-0903. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department E. July 7, 2009. *291 Friedman Rubin & White By William S. Cummings and Richard H. Friedman and James A. Hertz, Bremerto

DRAKE, J., dissenting in part. hi respectfully dissent from that portion of the majority opinion finding that the trial court was incorrect in awarding the plaintiff attorneys’ fees pursuant to the open account statute, La. R.S. 9:2781, in this motion for summary judgment which arose in the context of a suit on an open account and the lien enforcement provisions of the Louisiana Private Works Act, La. R.S. 9:4

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. In 2011 Wisconsin enacted a statute requiring voters to present photographic identification. 2011 Wis. Act 23. A federal district judge found that the statute violates the Constitution as well as the Voting Rights Act and enjoined its application across the board. 17 F.Supp.3d 837 (E.D.Wis.2014). We reversed that decision. 768 F.3d 744 (7th Cir.2014).

543 F.3d 498 (2008) Pamela McDONALD; Kanya Coleman, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COLDWELL BANKER, Coldwell Banker Real Estate Corporation First Shasta Realty; Thomas Gallagher; Richard Mattioli, Defendants-Appellees. No. 06-16563. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 15, 2008. Filed September 10, 2008.

30 So.3d 286 (2010) STATE v. WALKER. No. 2009 KA 1741. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. February 17, 2010. McDONALD, J. Decision Without Published Opinion Conviction, Habitual Offender Adjudication, and Sentence Affirmed.

MEMORANDUM ** Mario McDonald appeals from the 125-month sentence imposed following remand under United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1085 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), McDonald’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.

MEMORANDUM** Roderick Keith McDonald appeals from the judgment and the District Court’s sentencing decision entered following his conviction by a jury for mail fraud depriving the public of the right of honest services of a public official, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 and 1346, bribery concerning government receiving federal funds, 18 U.S.C. § 666, conspiracy to commit extortion under color of official right, 18 U.S.C

565 S.E.2d 273 (2002) STATE of North Carolina v. John Walker MCDONALD No. COA01-888. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. July 2, 2002. *274 Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Isaac T. Avery, III, Special Deputy Attorney General, and Patricia A. Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, for the State. R. Allen Lytch, PA, by Marshall

206 S.W.3d 258 (2005) LOGAN COUNTY and AAC Risk Management Services, Appellants v. Jimmy McDONALD, Appellee. No. CA 04-976. Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division III. April 6, 2005. *260 Roberts Law Firm, P.A., by: John D. Webster, Little Rock, for appellants. Walker, Shock, Cox & Harp, P.L.L.C., by: Eddie H. Walker,