Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “W v. School District of Newberry County”
State v. Newberrypublic domain
[Cite as State v. Newberry, 2023-Ohio-3623.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 111431 v. : RONALD NEWBERRY,
Angela Michelle Newberry v. Jeremy Mack Newberrypublic domain
06/20/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 16, 2018 ANGELA MICHELLE NEWBERRY v. JEREMY MACK NEWBERRY Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County No. 07D262 W. Neil Thomas, III, Judge No. E2017-00340-COA-R3-CV In this
Briggs v. Newberry County School Districtpublic domain
838 F.Supp. 232 (1992) Frances W. BRIGGS, Plaintiff, v. The NEWBERRY COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT; Vance O. Johnson, in his individual capacity; Mitchell Strickland, in his individual capacity; Donna Elmore, in her individual capacity, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 8:92-0179-3. United States District Court, D. South Carolina. June 9, 1992. *233
Major v. Village of Newberrypublic domain
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DEBRA MAJOR, FOR PUBLICATION August 2, 2016 Plaintiff-Appellant, 9:00 a.m. v No. 322368 Luce Circuit Co
Ruel Newberry v. Brisa Newberrypublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS RUEL NEWBERRY, Appellant, v. BRISA NEWBERRY, Appellee. § §
King v. Charleston County School Districtpublic domain
664 F.Supp.2d 571 (2009) William KING, Plaintiff, v. CHARLESTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant. Civil Action No. 2:07-CV-3949-PMD. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division. May 21, 2009. *574 A. Christopher Potts, Hitchcock and Potts, Charleston, SC, for Plaintiff. Alice Fountain Paylor, Eliz
Ruel Newberry v. Brisa Newberrypublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS RUEL NEWBERRY, § No. 08-10-00062-CV Appellant, § Appeal from the v. §
BURKE, Chief Justice. [11] Appellant, Jacob Fugle, brought suit against Appellees, Sublette County School District # 9 and his teacher, Stephen Nelson, for injuries he sustained during a science demonstration conducted in the school gymnasium. Appellees sought summary judgment claiming immunity under the Wyoming Governmental Claims Act (Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 1-39-101 et seq.). The d
Newberry v. Bohn-Newberrypublic domain
SUBSTITUTED OPINION By this restricted appeal, Roy August Newberry challenges a default judgment granting a Final Decree of Divorce. In four points of error, appellant contends the trial court erred in its award of child support and division of property. We modify the judgment of the trial court and affirm as modified. Procedural Background Appellee filed for divorce on February 26, 2002, and served appellant
366 S.C. 611 (2005) 622 S.E.2d 733 EAGLE CONTAINER CO., LLC and Jeffrey D. Spotts, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Alfred D. Spotts, Respondents, v. COUNTY OF NEWBERRY, a political subdivision, and Susie Berry, in her capacity as Zoning Administrator of Newberry County, Appellants. No. 4037. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard October 1
PER CURIAM: This suit was instituted by the United States in May of 1969 under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-6, against the Saluda County School District No. 1 of Saluda County, South Carolina, to require the defendants to afford equal educational opportunity to all students in the Saluda County School
Roy August Newberry v. April Bohn-Newberrypublic domain
Affirmed as Modified; Opinion of May 18, 2004 Withdrawn and Substituted Opinion filed July 15, 2004. </
S.N.B. v. Pearland Independent School Districtpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GREGG COSTA, District Judge. ■ After Plaintiff S.B.’s junior high school principals discovered that she sent what they termed a “lewd” image of a female friend to other students,- they sent her. to a disciplinary learning program for 30 days. In the year preceding that transfer, S.B. alleges that she was subject to repeated bullying on and off campus. She now asserts a vari
639 F.3d 507 (2011) Deana TUSING, Appellant, v. DES MOINES INDEPENDENT COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, dba Des Moines Public Schools; Celeste Keeling; Dee Culp, Appellees. No. 10-1004. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: October 21, 2010. Filed: April 12, 2011. *512 Richard Gittins Book, argued,
Newberry v. Befortpublic domain
28 Kan. App.2d 807 (2001) 20 P.3d 1281 JUSTIN LEE NEWBERRY, Appellant, v. RICHARD DEAN BEFORT, District Magistrate Judge, Position 2, of the 30th Judicial District of Kansas, Appellee. No. 85,904. Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion filed April 6, 2001. Stephen M. Joseph, of Joseph & Hollander, of Wichita, for appellant.
Newberry Township v. Stambaughpublic domain
848 A.2d 173 (2004) NEWBERRY TOWNSHIP v. Ray STAMBAUGH, Appellant. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted on Briefs January 23, 2004. Decided April 22, 2004. *174 Eugene R. Campbell, York, for appellant. John C. Herrold, York, for appellee. BEFORE: McGINLEY, Judge, and LEAVITT, Judge, and MIRARCHI, JR., Senio
OPINION KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Sharon Macy (“Macy”) appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant-Appellee Hopkins County School Board of Education (“the Board”). Macy alleged that the Board violated federal and state law by firing her because she was disabled and in retaliation for protected activ
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-00-00382-CV Ronald T. Mahan/Robert L. Lehman, Individually and as Assignee of the City of Georgetown; Georgetown Independent School District; Williamson County<
Nettles v. Spartanburg School District 7public domain
341 S.C. 580 (2000) 535 S.E.2d 146 Katherine Jane NETTLES, Appellant, v. SPARTANBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT # 7, Employer, and SC School Boards Self-Insurance Trust Fund, Carrier, Respondents. No. 3213. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard May 10, 2000. Decided July 10, 2000. Rehearing Denied September 2, 2000.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges AtLee, Ortiz and Lorish PUBLISHED Argued at Richmond, Virginia ANNE EDWARDS HARTLEY, ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No. 1298-22-2 JUDGE DANIEL E. ORTIZ FEBRUARY 13,