Cases

DECISION AND ORDER HON. MICHAEL A. TELESCA, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Represented by counsel, John J. Teixe-ria (“Téixeria” or “Plaintiff’) instituted this *221product liability action in New York State Supreme Court (Erie County) against St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc., St. Jude Medical, Inc., and Pacesetter, Inc.,

704 F.2d 908 Kanwal KUMAR, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.MARION COUNTY COMMON PLEAS COURT, DIVISION OF DOMESTICRELATIONS; Hon. Robert A. Kelly, Judge of said Court; Hon.Donald Hall, Marion County Common Pleas Court, Division ofDomestic Relations; Marion County Bar Association; ThomasK. Jenkins, President; Margaret Howser, Clerk of Court,Marion County Common Pleas Court; Margaret Newman,Assignment Clerk, Marion County C

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC14-990 ____________ HENRY LEE JONES, Appellant, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. [March 2, 2017] PER CURIAM. Henry Lee Jones

824 P.2d 83 (1991) Lula ADAMS, Avelino Alvarez, Isabelle Archuletta, Julian Baker, Donna Barger for Lori Barger, Emily Bell, David Bennett, Clara Bonger, Paul Boston, Jessie Boyd for Bonnie Boyd, Pinya Breyman, Jeanette Buttz, Constance Carey, Mary Cleveland, Annie Chilcote, Pearl Colegrove, Marjorie Collard, Carl Courts, Imogene Davis, Lois Davis, Charles DiDuglielmo, Gladys Ellis, Alfred Feeruz, Anna L. Fisher, Edna Fisher, Gilbert Gallegos, Annie Garc

MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES H. HANCOCK, Senior District Judge. The court has before it the Motion (Doc. # 29) for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Tyson Foods, Inc. (“Tyson”) on July 5, -2013. Pursuant to the court’s orders of July 9, 2013 (Doc. # 33), July 15, 2013 (Doc. # 35), and September 6, 2013 (Doc. # 40), the motion for summary judgment is now under submission and is considered herein without or

403 F.Supp.2d 294 (2005) Dalia GAL, f/k/a Dalia Gal-Ghelber, Plaintiff, v. VIACOM INTERNATIONAL, INC., Simon & Schuster, Inc., The Thomson Corporation, Thomson Gale, Inc., Thorndike Press, Simon & Schuster Audio, Inc., a division of Simon & Schuster, Inc., Pocket Books, Inc., a division of Simon & Schuster, Inc., and Mary Higgins Clark, Defendants. No. 05 Civ.0263 (CSH). United States D

PER CURIAM. This is a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, 1985, 1986, and 1988 in which Kanwal Kumar seeks redress for alleged violations of his constitutional rights to due process and to equal protection of the laws. The district court, after thorough consideration of all issues raised by the complaint as amended, dismissed the action as to all defendants. We affirm. Briefly, the case ari

OPINION Opinion by Justice MOSELEY. This case is an appeal of a suit brought by Claude A. Lucas and wife, Bonnie Lucas, involving the title to the surface and some appurtenant mineral rights to a called 63.6-acre tract of land in Shelby County, Texas.1 In a suit in trespass to *270try title against multiple defendants,

518 F.Supp.2d 526 (2007) Dalia GAL, f/k/a Dalia Gal-Bhelber, Plaintiff, v. VIACOM INTERNATIONAL, INC., Simon & Schuster, Inc., the Thomson Corporation, Thomson Gale, Inc., Thorndike Press, Simon & Schuster Audio, Inc., a division of Simon & Schuster, Inc., Pocket Books, Inc., a division of Simon & Schuster, Inc., and Mary Higgins Clark, Defendants. No. 05 Civ. 0263(CSH). United States D

191 F.Supp.2d 1292 (2002) HOUSEHOLD BANK, f.s.b., Plaintiff, v. JFS GROUP, et al., Defendants, H & R Block, et al., Plaintiffs/Intervenors. No. CIV.A. 01A1405N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. March 8, 2002. *1293 *1294 Stewart M. Cox, Andrew J. Noble, II

264 F.3d 344 (3rd Cir. 2001) IN RE: ORTHOPEDIC BONE SCREW PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION (MDL No. 1014)J.T. Bradley and Kathy W. Bradley, Appellants in No. 00-3899Regina M. Luellen and Eurston Luellen, Sr., Appellants in No. 00-3900Randal Jon Uribe, Appellant in No. 00-3901Mitchell H. Walker and Kim S. Walker, Appellants in No. 00-3902Jose Morfin, Appellant in No. 00-3903Mary K. Mullen Schmelter and Kurt Allen Schmelter, Appel

CONSENT JUDGMENT GADOLA, District Judge. This matter having come before the Court upon the stipulation of the parties to the entry of a Consent Judgment finally and fully resolving all of the remaining claims in this action; and It appearing to the Court that this action, initially commenced some twenty-two years ago, involves claims of discrimination based upon gender in hi

173 Cal.App.2d 367 (1959) THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. JOSEPH DONALD MURPHY et al., Defendants; DANIEL CALVIN HALL et al., Appellants. Crim. No. 6332. California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Two. Aug. 27, 1959. Al Matthews, Gladys Towles Root and Eugene V. McPherson for Appellants. *371 Stanley Mosk, Attorney Ge

215 F.Supp.2d 795 (2002) In re NORPLANT CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1038. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 14, 2002. *796 *797 Christopher Matthew Parks, Parker & Parks, Port Arthur, TX, for Plaintiffs. F. Lane Heard III, Williams

NlMS, Judge: In these consolidated cases, respondent determined aggregate deficiencies in excess of $61 million in petitioners’ Federal income taxes for the years 1975 through 1980.2 Each of the petitioners in these cases entered into a series of transactions herein sometimes referred to for convenience as the London Options Transaction. Th

OPINION OF THE COURT REAVLEY, Circuit Judge. This Federal Torts Claims Act (FTCA) claim against the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for granting clearance to market certain types of pedicle screw fixation devices (referred to generally as bone screws) was dismissed by the District Court pursuant to the discretionary function exception to the FTCA.1 Appellants contend here that