Cases

*** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 29-DEC-2020 09:51 AM Dkt. 47 OP

Timothy C. Stanceu, Chief Judge Stanceu, Chief Judge: In this consolidated case, 1 plaintiff Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Limited ("Fine Furniture") and numerous other Chinese companies that are producers or exporters of multilayered wood flooring contested a decision of the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (

OPINION AND ORDER Stanceu, Chief Judge: In this consolidated action, 1 plaintiff Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Limited (“Fine Furniture”) and several other Chinese producers or exporters of multilayered wood flooring contest an administrative decision that the International Trade Administration,

NOTICE: SLIP OPINION (not the court’s final written decision) The opinion that begins on the next page is a slip opinion. Slip opinions are the written opinions that are originally filed by the court. A slip opinion is not necessarily the court’s final written decision. Slip opinions can be changed by subsequent court orders. For example, a court may issue an order making substantive changes to a slip opinion or publishing for precedential pur

MaddeN, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: The Government has filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s petition on the grounds that it does not state a cause of action of which this court has jurisdiction, and that any right which the plaintiff might have had is barred by the Statute of Limitations. We, therefore, recite briefly the facts which the plaintiff alleges in his petition.

251 U.S. 355 (1920) EASTERN EXTENSION, AUSTRALASIA & CHINA TELEGRAPH COMPANY, LIMITED, v. UNITED STATES. No. 357. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 15, 1919. Decided January 12, 1920. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. *356 Mr. Louis Marshall for appellant. Mr. Assistant Attorney

206 U.S. 333 (1907) HOMER E. GRAFTON, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR v. THE UNITED STATES. No. 358. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 18, 19, 1907. Decided May 27, 1907. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. *334 Mr. Clarence S. Nettles and Mr. John H. Atwood, with whom Mr. Fred

327 U.S. 1 (1946) IN RE YAMASHITA. No. 61, MISC. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 7, 8, 1946. Decided February 4, 1946. APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND WRIT OF PROHIBITION.[*]*4 Colonel Harry E. Clarke, pro hac vice, Captain A. Frank Reel and Captain