Cases

GARY W. LYNCH, Judge. The marriage of Carl Petersen (“Carl”)1 and Virginia Elaine Petersen (“Elaine”) was dissolved by judgment of the Circuit Court of Newton County, wherein Carl was ordered to pay Elaine maintenance. Alleging a reduction in his income, Carl filed a motion to modify the judgment on February 13, 2003, seeking to lower or eliminate his maintenance obligation. Following trial on De

143 F.Supp.2d 569 (2001) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Derick Anthony PETERSEN. No. Crim. 3:00CR155. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. April 27, 2001. *570 *571 Brian R. Hood, Assistant United States Attorney, United States Attorney's Office, Richmond, VA, for Unite

By JUDGE JOHN E. CLARKSON I have now had an opportunity to completely review the entire file, transcript, and depositions and have given the Commissioner’s Report great weight in considering all of the evidence and facts. In deciding the difficult question of custody, the welfare of the child is the primary, paramount, and controlling consideration. All other matters are secondary. As between parents, the

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice. Sally, a pseudonym for S.H., appeals from the order of the District Court for the Northwest Judicial District, sitting as a Juvenile Court pursuant to Section 27-20-02(6), N.D.C.C., denying her motion to vacate an order terminating her parental rights in her son David, a pseudonym for D.J.H. We affirm. David was born on February 20, 1986, to Sally, an unmarried 22-year-old woman.

898 P.2d 210 (1995) 135 Or.App. 344 Austin PETERSEN, dba A Austin 1 Stop Plumbing, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT, Respondent. 93-T-0071A; CA A84589. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted March 10, 1995. Decided June 28, 1995. *212 Jeffrey E. Potter, Eugene, argued the cau

PER CURIAM This is the companion case to Petersen v. Employment Dept. (A84589), 135 Or App 344, 898 P2d 210 (1995). With the exception that this case did not involve the provision of services before October 4, 1989, the material facts and issues presented in this case are identical to those in that case. We adopt and reiterate our analysis in Petersen pertaining to the period October 4, 1989 through December

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MI FAMILIA VOTA; et al., No. 24-3188 Plaintiffs - Appellees, D.C. No. v. 2:22-cv-00509- SRB ADRIAN FONTES, in his official District of capacity as Arizona Secretary of Arizona, State; et al., Phoenix Defendan

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 1 2024 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MI FAMILIA VOTA; VOTO No. 24-3188 LATINO; LIVING UNITED FOR D.C. No. CHANGE IN ARIZONA;

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MI FAMILIA VOTA; VOTO No. 24-3188 LATINO; LIVING UNITED FOR D.C. No. CHANGE IN ARIZONA; LEAGUE 2:22-cv-00509- OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN SRB CITIZENS ARIZONA; ARIZONA STUDENTS' ASSOCIATION; ADRC ACTION; INTER TRIBAL COUNCIL OF ARIZONA, INC.; OPINION SAN CARLOS APACHE TRIBE; ARIZONA COALITION FOR

Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.gov. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA LYDIA MAY, f/k/a Lydia Petersen, ) ) Supreme

FADELEY, J. At issue is the attempted redemption of a residence from a sheriffs sale following foreclosure and judgment for the balance due on a mortgage between Petersen and Oregon’s Department of Veterans’ Affairs. The case comes to us as a dispute between Newman, the purchaser at the sheriffs sale, and Rita Petersen, the homeowner who gave a mortgage in 1968 to the Oregon Department of Veterans’ Affairs (

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT HELEN ROE, a minor, by and No. 25-6970 through her parent and next friend D.C. No. Megan Roe; JAMES POE, a minor, 4:20-cv-00484- by and through his parent and next JAS friend Laura Poe; CARL VOE, a Distri

The opinion of the court was delivered by Stegall, J.: Henry Petersen-Beard challenges his sentence to lifetime postrelease registration as a sex offender pursuant to the Kansas Offender Registration Act (KORA), K.S.A. 22-4901 et seq., as cruel and unusual punishment in violation of § 9 of the Kansas Bill of Rights and the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Because we find th

ORDER ROSLYN O. SILVER, Senior District Judge. This case involves a dispute between a former employee and the companies to which he applied to work as a flight instructor in Saudi Arabia in 2008. Since the case’s inception, the complaint has been through several iterations. On February 18, 2015, the Court resolved a motion to -dismiss and allowed two counts to proceed: one for fraud an

PER CURIAM: Allan A. Petersen, a federal prisoner, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). Petersen appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his retaliation claim for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and the remaining

ORDER GRANTING COMPASS BANK’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (11-0871, DOC. NO. 211) AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (11-01201, DOC. NO. 106); AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (11-0871, DOC. NOS. 147,158) VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS, District Judge. Before the Court is one motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Compass Bank and Roundpoint Mortgage Servicing Corporation (“Roundpo

14 So.3d 300 (2009) C. Thomas PETERSEN, Appellant, v. Edmund S. WHITSON, Jr., Appellee. No. 2D09-877. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. August 19, 2009. *301 William H. Phelan, Jr., of Bond, Arnett, Phelan, Smith & Craggs, P.A., Ocala, for Appellant. William H. Walker and Adam S. Rubenfield of The L

NEWMAN, J. Appellant (purchaser) appeals an order that required that the sheriff of Washington County issue to Petersen (mortgagor) a certificate of redemption for real property that purchaser bought at a mortgage foreclosure sale on March 26, 1986, if mortgagor were to tender the redemption amount less than one year after the sale.1 We reverse. Mortgagor gave a mortgage on the p

RIGGS, J. The state appeals an order approving the final accounting for an estate. We affirm. The state made $21,733.10 in medical assistance payments to the decedent. ORS 414.105(2) authorizes the state to recover medical assistance payments from the recipient’s estate.1 Accordingly, in 1982, the state filed a liquidated claim against the decedent’s estate for $21,733.10. Because t

KELLY, C. J. We granted leave to appeal in this case to determine the parties against whom attorney fees may be prorated under MCL 418.315(1). We conclude that the term “prorate” in MCL 418.315(1) applies only to employers and their insurance carriers. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY <