⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

19 opinions for “Virginia Guerrero Winn”

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022-03-03 · Published · cited 0×
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-2036 IN RE: LUMBER LIQUIDATORS CHINESE-MANUFACTURED FLOORING PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (1:15-md-02627-AJT-TRJ) IN RE: LUMBER LIQUIDATORS CHINESE-MANUFACTURED FLOORING DURABILITY MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION (1:16- md-0
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2017-05-15 · Published · cited 25× · 252 F. Supp. 3d 504
OPINION AND ORDER Mark S. Davis, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUD'GE This matter is before the Court on a motion seeking attorney’s fees1 and costs, ECF No. 43, and a motion for leave to file supplemental authority, ECF No. 56, filed by Plaintiff David D. Denton (“Plaintiff’). Plaintiffs motion for attorney’s fees and costs is filed pursuant to the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.
Fisher v. Salutepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2008-02-26 · Published · cited 13× · 657 S.E.2d 169; 51 Va. App. 293; 2008 Va. App. LEXIS 99
657 S.E.2d 169 (2008) 51 Va. App. 293 Russell FISHER v. Paul C. SALUTE, Administrator of the Estate of Joseph John Salute, Deceased. Record No. 0542-07-4. Court of Appeals of Virginia, Alexandria. February 26, 2008. *170 Richard W. Driscoll (Richard E. Starr; Driscoll & Seltzer, PLLC; Irving Starr Esq.
California Supreme Court · 2024-03-28 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA MARK HARROD, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. COUNTRY OAKS PARTNERS, LLC, et al., Defendants and Appellants. S276545 Second Appellate District, Division Four B312967 Los Angeles County Superior Court 20STCV26536 March 28, 2024 Just
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021-09-01 · Published · cited 21× · 12 F.4th 422
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1409 MAXWELL KADEL; JASON FLECK; CONNOR THONEN-FLECK, by his next friends and parents; JULIA MCKEOWN; MICHAEL D. BUNTING, JR.; C.B., by his next friends and parents; SAM SILVAINE, Plaintiffs – Appellees, v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE HEALTH PLAN FOR TEACHERS AND STATE EMPLO
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021-12-02 · Published · cited 0×
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1409 MAXWELL KADEL; JASON FLECK; CONNOR THONEN-FLECK, by his next friends and parents; JULIA MCKEOWN; MICHAEL D. BUNTING, JR.; C.B., by his next friends and parents; SAM SILVAINE, Plaintiffs – Appellees, v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE HEALTH PLAN FOR TEACHERS AND STATE EMPLO
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-01-26 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-14-00593-CR FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 1/26/2015 7:39:24 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE
District Court, C.D. California · 2014-05-23 · Published · cited 5× · 28 F. Supp. 3d 1019; 2014 WL 2937478; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91096
ORDER (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS AND (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR COSTS SUZANNE H. SEGAL, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On January 30, 2014, trial in this matter was held. The Court previously adjudicated several issues in an Order resolving the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment (“MSJ Order”)
California Supreme Court · 2025-11-26 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 11/25/25 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA TAKING OFFENSE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant and Respondent. S270535 Third Appellate District C088485 Sacramento County Superior Court 34-2017-80002749-C
California Supreme Court · 2025-11-06 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA TAKING OFFENSE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant and Respondent. S270535 Third Appellate District C088485 Sacramento County Superior Court 34-2017-80002749-CU-WM-GDS November 6, 2025
Ivery v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996-04-19 · Published · cited 31× · 686 So. 2d 495; 1996 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 113; 1996 WL 187767
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 497 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 498 Samuel Ivery was convicted after a jury trial of the capital offense of murder of Deborah Lewis committed during a robbery in th
Texas Supreme Court · 2015-10-26 · Published · cited 0×
A\ttmrne·'ys at La\W Chase . Bank Of Te~as . - Gulfgate -2900 Woodridge, Suite 202 Houston, Texas 77087 (713) 645-7894 (713) 6
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993-08-25 · Published · cited 5× · 999 F.2d 831; 1993 WL 319087
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: Over the past fifty years, the steady march of civil rights has been to New Orleans and this court. It continues but the demands have changed. Relatively clear lines of legality and morality have become more difficult to locate as demands for outcomes have followed the cutting away of obstacles to full participation. With our diverse ethnic makeup, this demand for results in voting has
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-10-27 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00505-CV 7568197 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/27/2015 5:20:
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993-08-23 · Published · cited 148× · 999 F.2d 831; 26 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1379; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 21213; 1993 WL 319087
999 F.2d 831 62 USLW 2175, 26 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1379 LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, COUNCIL NO. 4434,Plaintiffs-Appellees,andJesse Oliver, et al., Intervening Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.William P. CLEMENTS, Etc., et al., Defendants.Jim MATTOX, et al., Defendants-Appellees-Appellants,v.Judge F. Harold ENTZ, Etc., Judge Sharolyn Wood, Etc., andGeorge S. Bayoud, Jr., Etc., Defendants-
California Supreme Court · 1860-07-01 · Published · cited 45× · 16 Cal. 220; 1860 Cal. LEXIS 212
Baldwin, J. This was suit to recover a lot in San Francisco, the plaintiff deraigning title through a grant made by an Alcalde after the conquest or possession by the authorities of the United States. The defendants questioned the validity of this grant. We considered this question in the recent case of Hart v. Burnett. We held in that case: “ First, that San Francisco was, at the date of the conquest and cessi
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2015-07-23 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 7/23/2
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-03-18 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-15-00126-CV