Cases

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2021 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

William F. Chinnock, Judge. {¶ 1} This case involves claims for breach of fiduciary duty, violation of the Ohio mortgage brokers Act, and breach of contract. For the reasons specified below, judgment is rendered in favor of plaintiffs and against defendants on all claims. « *19I. The Claims {¶ 2} Plaintiffs William and Betty Myer (“the

115 B.R. 258 (1990) In re DOBBS, Reginald, Dobbs, Karalee, Debtors. Neal and Julie CUSTER, husband and wife, and Pioneer Title Company of Ada County, an Idaho corporation, Plaintiffs, v. Reginald and Karalee DOBBS, husband and wife, and C. Barry Zimmerman, Trustee, Defendants. C. Barry ZIMMERMAN, acting as Trustee of the bankruptcy estate of Reginald and Karalee Dobbs, Counterclaimant, v. PIONEER TITLE COMPANY OF ADA COUNTY, an Id

Justice Brennan, with whom Justice Marshall and Justice Blackmun join, and with whom Justice Stevens joins as to Parts II-B, II-C, and III, concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part. What the Court declines to snatch away with one hand, it takes with the other. Though the Court today reaffirms §1981’s applicability to private conduct, i

478 F.Supp.2d 775 (2007) AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, et al. v. Alberto R. GONZALES in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States. Civil Action No. 98-5591. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. March 22, 2007. *776 *777 Addison F. Golladay, Benjamin Sahl, Chr

83 F.Supp.2d 70 (1999) SERVICE EMPLOYEES INT'L UNION HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PHILIP MORRIS INC., et al., Defendants. S.E.I.U. Local 74 Welfare Fund, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Philip Morris Inc., et al., Defendants. Michael H. Holland, Trustee of the United Mine Workers of America Combined Benefit Fund, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Philip Morris Inc., et al., Defendants. Nos. CIV.A 98-70

MEMORANDUM EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge. *305TABLE OF CONTENTS I. BACKGROUND...........................................................305 II. LEGAL STANDARD ......................................................306 III. DISCUSSION.........................................................

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NOVEDADES Y SERVICIOS, No. 25-4238 INC.; ESPERANZA GOMEZ D.C. No. ESCOBAR, 3:25-cv-00886- JLS-DDL Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. OPINION FINANCIAL CRIMES ENFORCEMENT NETWORK; ANDREA GACKI

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2022 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

OPINION ERVIN, Chief Judge: Sofia Pandazides brought this action against the Virginia Board of Education (“the Board”) alleging discrimination on the basis of handicap in violation of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. § 794 (West Supp.1993). Concluding that Pandazides was not “otherwise qualified” for the position of

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 600 U. S. Part 1 Pages 181–411 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 29, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: Plaintiff LSSi Data Corp. (“LSSi”) moves, pursuant to 47 U.S.C. §§ 202(a), 251(b)(3), and 406, for a preliminary injunction compelling defendant Time Warner Cable, Inc. (“TWC”) to provide it with all directory assistance listing data for TWC’s telephone subscribers. For the following reasons, LSSi’s motion is denied.

ACCEPTED 04-14-00829-cv 04-14-00829-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXA

352 F.Supp.2d 195 (2004) Gertrude VERMANDE and Herman Vaneck, Plaintiffs, v. HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 3:04CV1154 (MRK). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. December 28, 2004. *196 Gertrude Vermande, East Haven, CT, pro se. Herman Vaneck, Ivoryton, CT, pro se. Adam J. Cohen, Brid

449 F.Supp.2d 992 (2006) Barbara SCHWAB et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Lorillard Tobacco Co., Ligget Group, Inc., American Tobacco Co., Altria Group, Inc., British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd., Defendants. No. 04-CV-1945(JBW). United States District Court

485 F.Supp. 1097 (1979) FALLS STAMPING & WELDING COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. The INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AIRCRAFT & AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. C76-170A. United States District Court, N. D. Ohio, E. D. September 27, 1979. *1098 *1099

226 F.Supp.2d 1047 (2002) ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC., an Arkansas corporation; Entergy Gulf States, Inc., a Texas corporation; Entergy Louisiana, Inc., a Louisiana corporation; Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation, a Delaware corporation, ["Entergy & Wolf Creek"] Plaintiffs, Central Interstate Low-Level Radio-active Waste Commission, ["Commission"] Realigned Plaintiff, US Ecology, Inc., a California corporation, ["USE"] Intervenor-Plaintiff,<

216 S.W.3d 436 (2006) FORMOSA PLASTICS CORP., USA, Appellant, v. KAJIMA INTERNATIONAL, INC., Appellee. No. 13-02-00385-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi-Edinburg. December 28, 2006. *443 David R. Montpas, San Antonio, TX, for Appellant. Steven John Lownds, Quilling, Selander, Cummiskey & Lownds, Dallas, TX,

545 U.S. 913 (2005) METRO-GOLDWYN-MAYER STUDIOS INC. ET AL. v. GROKSTER, LTD., ET AL. No. 04-480. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 29, 2005. Decided June 27, 2005. *916 Donald B. Verrilli, Jr., argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs for the motion picture studio and recording

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH. Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS. RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge. Several years ago, an agency of the District of Columbia sponsored a city-wide, outdoor exhibit of polyurethane models of donkeys and elephants, each painted and decorated by a different artist. The exhibit lasted five months.