Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING THE MOTION OF CERTAIN TPG DEFENDANTS TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION MARTIN GLENN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Pending before the Court is the Motion of Certain TPG Defendants to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint for Lade of Personal Jurisdiction (the “Motion,” ECF Doc. # 211). The Motion is supported by the TPG Moving Defendants’

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17-3358 FRANCES L. ROGERS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States Tax Court.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 23-2397 & 23-2398 CARL CULP and ROBERTA CULP, Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. SCOTT CAUDILL, et al., Defendants-Appellees, and WHITNEY WOODS and STEVAN SCHULIEN, Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appell

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 23-2397 & 23-2398 CARL CULP and ROBERTA CULP, Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. SCOTT CAUDILL, et al., Defendants-Appellees, and WHITNEY WOODS and STEVAN SCHULIEN, Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appell

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge. Before the Court are the motions for summary judgment of railcar manufacturer Defendants The Budd Company ("Budd") (ECF No. 110) and Resco Holdings, L.L.C. ("Resco") (ECF No. 111) (together, "Defendants"), asserting that the claims of Plaintiff Peggy Hassell are pre-empted by federal statutes intended to regulate the entire fields of locomotive equipment and train safety, specifically, the Locomot

233 Argued and submitted August 24, 2021, reversed and remanded January 26, petition for review allowed June 23, 2022 (369 Or 855) See later issue Oregon Reports Christine MOODY, individually, and in her capacity as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Steven “Troy” Moody, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant,

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 15‐2516 RONALD OLIVA, Plaintiff‐Appellant, v. BLATT, HASENMILLER, LEIBSKER & MOORE, LLC, Defendant‐Appellee.

per curiam: Hoy evaluamos una querella presentada contra un Juez Superior por intervenir indebidamente con una potencial testigo durante la investigación de una queja ética. Procede evaluar también la conducta de ese juez al contactar personalmente a la abogada de su exesposa —es-tando pendientes ciertas controversias judiciales entre am-bos— con el propósito de indisponerla en su contra. Por las razones que e

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

82 ,CI'!CI ~02,05.<>

318 June 18, 2025 No. 545 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. QUINTON LEE BRACKEN, aka Quinton Bracken, Defendant-Appellant. Douglas County Circuit Court 19CR72547; A176684 Frances Elaine Burge, Judge. Submitted April 24, 2023. Ernest G.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1332 RUFUS WEST, also known as Mansa Lutalo Iyapo, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JARED HOY, 1 in his official capacity as Secretary of the Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Defendant-Appellee. ____

318 June 18, 2025 No. 545 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. QUINTON LEE BRACKEN, aka Quinton Bracken, Defendant-Appellant. Douglas County Circuit Court 19CR72547; A176684 Frances Elaine Burge, Judge. Submitted April 24, 2023. Ernest G.

KONENKAMP, Justice [¶ 1.] Defendant failed to return government issued equipment at the end of his military service with the South Dakota Army National Guard. When he was charged with theft under a law making it a crime to retain military property, the circuit court dismissed the indictment, concluding that the statute violated our consti*2tutional prohibition on imprison

USCA11 Case: 22-11187 Document: 58-1 Date Filed: 01/12/2024 Page: 1 of 24 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-11187 ____________________ OMAR SANTOS, on behalf of themsel

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 15‐2279 & 15‐2363 ALTOM TRANSPORT, INC., Plaintiff‐Appellant, v. WESTCHESTER FIRE INSURANCE CO., Defendant‐Appellee,

No. 816 September 17, 2025 445 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON Nicholas LOPER, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Lindsay BRAKEL, Defendant-Appellant, and PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE CORPORATION, INC. et al., Defendants. Multnomah County Circuit Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT YAN FANG DU, individually and as  Assignee of Joon Hak Kim, No. 10-56422 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:08-cv-06301- ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY;  GW-PJW DEERBROOK INSURANCE COMPANY, a ORDER AND subsidiary of Allstate Insurance A

U N I T E D S T AT E S D I S T R I C T C O U R T F O R T H E D I S T R I C T O F N E W H AM P S H I R E C h a y n a D r a p e a u , e t a l. v. Ca se No. 22-cv-00150-P B Opin ion No. 2025 DNH 052 B lu e s t e m B r a n d s , I n c ., e t a l. ME MO R AN D U M AN D O R D E R Ch a yn

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 06-30402 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No. CR-04-00267-EFS DUSTIN CHRISTENSEN, OPINION Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court