Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
19 opinions for “Vincent Maurice Hampton”
BRIGHT, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur in Part II of the opinion written by Judge John R. Gibson. I would, however, remand this case to the district court for a determination of the merits of the claim because I believe Purnell has exhausted his state remedies. In his pro se pet
American International Group, Consol. Deriv. Lit.public domain
976 A.2d 872 (2009) AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC., CONSOLIDATED DERIVATIVE LITIGATION. American International Group, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Maurice R. Greenberg and Howard I. Smith, Defendants. C.A. No. 769-VCS. Court of Chancery of Delaware. Submitted: April 20, 2009. Decided: June 17, 2009. *874 Stuart M.
Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Insurance v. Underwriters at Lloyd's & Companies Collectivepublic domain
994 A.2d 262 (2010) 121 Conn.App. 31 HARTFORD STEAM BOILER INSPECTION AND INSURANCE COMPANY v. UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S AND COMPANIES COLLECTIVE et al. No. 30162. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued January 11, 2010. Decided May 11, 2010. *267 Paul K. Stockman, Pittsburgh, PA, pro hac vi
Dnt, LLC v. Sprint Spectrum, Lppublic domain
750 F.Supp.2d 616 (2010) DNT, LLC, Plaintiff, v. SPRINT SPECTRUM, LP and Nextel Operations, Ind., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:09CV21. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. August 30, 2010. *619 Rowland Braxton Hill, IV, Nichole Buck Vanderslice, Christian & Barton LLP, Roman Lifson, Samuel
American International Group, Inc. v. Greenbergpublic domain
965 A.2d 763 (2009) AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC., Consolidated Derivative Litigation. American International Group, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Maurice R. Greenberg and Howard I. Smith, Defendants. C.A. No. 769-VCS. Court of Chancery of Delaware. Submitted: November 12, 2008. Decided: February 10, 2009. *771 St
Doran v. Priddypublic domain
534 F.Supp. 30 (1981) Raymond James DORAN, V, a minor, by and through his parents and natural guardians, Rebecca Ann Doran and Raymond James Doran, III; and Rebecca Ann Doran and Raymond James Doran, III, Individually, Plaintiffs, v. Maurice F. PRIDDY, D.O., Defendant. Civ. A. No. 79-1205. United States District Court, D. Kansas. March 10, 1981.
Alan Metzgar v. KBR, Inc.public domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1960 In re: KBR, INC., Burn Pit Litigation. ------------------------------ ALAN METZGAR, RWT 09-744; PAUL PARKER, and all others similarly situated: RWT 09-744; JOSHUA ELLER, RWT 09-2748; JOANNE OCHS, RWT 09-2747; MELISSA OCHS, RWT 09-2747; JAMES MORGAN, RWT 09-2747; DAVID NEWTON, RWT
United States v. Millan-Colonpublic domain
829 F.Supp. 620 (1993) UNITED STATES of America, v. Eric MILLAN-COLON, et al., Defendants. No. S9 91 Cr. 685 (SWK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 30, 1993. *621 *622 *623 Mary Jo White, U.S. Atty. S.D.N.Y. Office of U.S. Atty., New York
07/01/2002 Case Announcementspublic domain
[Cite as 07/01/2002 Case Announcements, 2002-Ohio-3343.] The Supreme Court of Ohio CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS July 1, 2002 DISCIPLINARY CASES 2001-0412. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Cleary. Patricia A. Cleary is reinstated to the practice of law. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS 2002-0902. Butcher v. Lewis. Stark App. No. 2001CA00219, 2002-Ohi
924 F.Supp. 270 (1996) NATIONAL BLACK POLICE ASSOCIATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND ETHICS, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 94-1476 (TFH). United States District Court, District of Columbia. April 18, 1996. *271 *272 Lawrence H. Mirel, Washington, D.C., Da
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Daniel Campbell v. City of Los Angelespublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,
In re KBR, Inc.public domain
FLOYD, Circuit Judge: *253The Constitution entrusts the President and Congress, not the courts, with the power to resolve political questions. See Japan Whaling Ass'n v. Am. Cetacean Soc'y , 478 U.S. 221, 230, <
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Registerpublic domain
Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register (2025 NY Slip Op 01717) Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register 2025 NY Slip Op 01717 Decided on March 20, 2025 Appellate Di
Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (2019 NY Slip Op 03883) Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. 2019 NY Slip Op 03883 Decided on May 16, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department
Meehan v. Central Railroad Company of New Jerseypublic domain
181 F.Supp. 594 (1960) Thomas F. MEEHAN, as Administrator of the Estate of Andrew T. Gill, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, Defendant. United States District Court S. D. New York. January 12, 1960. *595 *596 *597 Thomas F. Meehan, New York Cit
Hilton v. Thompsonpublic domain
227 S.W.2d 675 (1950) HILTON v. THOMPSON. No. 41350. Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 1. March 13, 1950. *676 *677 *678 Thomas J. Cole, Oliver L. Salter, St. Louis, Lyman J. Bishop, Belton, for appellant. Everett Hullverson, St. Louis, Edward
O'Connell v. Hove, Jr.public domain
JACOBS, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs are employees of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) who claim that the FDIC improperly classified their jobs as exempt from the overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-19 (1982). Upon motion by the FDIC, and after a hearing, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New Yor