Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
18 opinions for “Vincent Lee Tanksley”
United States v. Harrispublic domain
PUBLISHED OPINION OF THE COURT O’TOOLE, Chief Judge: This matter is again before this court, pursuant to the order of our superior court, to review an administrative file that contains the disposition of the appellant’s ethics complaint against a Government counsel. We are then to reconsider the appellant’s motion *783to reconsider and motion to re
Four Seasons Lakesites, Inc. v. HRS Properties, Inc.public domain
317 S.W.3d 193 (2010) FOUR SEASONS LAKESITES, INC. and Four Seasons Group, Inc., Appellants, v. HRS PROPERTIES, INC., Respondent. No. SD 30110. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One. July 23, 2010. *195 Lewis Z. Bridges & John E. Curran, Osage Beach, for Appellant. James B. Deutsch, Thomas W. Rynar
Austin v. Wellspublic domain
919 So.2d 961 (2006) Joseph AUSTIN, M.D. and Vicksburg Healthcare, LLC v. Kathy WELLS and Curtis Wells, Sr. No. 2004-IA-01251-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. January 19, 2006. Lee Davis Thames, Jr., Jackson, R.E. Parker, Jr., Robert L. Gibbs, Teselyn Afrique Funches, Jackson, attorneys for appellants. Carroll Rhodes, Hazlehurst, E. Vincent, Natchez, Davis,
State of Tennessee v. Rick Hanebuttpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs June 6, 2006 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RICK HANEBUTT Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Carroll County No. 04CR-49 C. Creed McGinley, Judge No. W2005-01301-CCA-R3-CD - Filed October 2, 2006 The defendant, Rick Hanebutt, was convicted of first degree premeditated murder
Joseph Austin v. Kathy Wellspublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2004-IA-01251-SCT JOSEPH AUSTIN, M.D. AND VICKSBURG HEALTHCARE, LLC v. KATHY WELLS AND CURTIS WELLS, SR. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/07/2004 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. LAMAR PICKARD COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: JEFFERSON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS: LEE DAVIS THAMES, JR.
City of Dallas v. Arredondopublic domain
OPINION Opinion by Justice LANG-MIERS. The City of Dallas filed these interlocutory appeals from orders denying its pleas to the jurisdiction in four lawsuits filed against the City by current and former police officers, firefighters, and rescue officers (the Officers) alleging that the City breached its contract with them regarding their pay. We consolidated the appeals for the purpose of
Rick D. Hanebutt v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON June 2, 2010 Session RICK D. HANEBUTT v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Carroll County No. 04CR49-PC Donald Parish, Judge No. W2009-01346-CCA-R3-PC - Filed November 9, 2010 The petitioner, Rick D. Hanebutt, appeals the Carroll County Circuit Court’s denial
City of Dallas, Texas v. Willis, Kevin Michaelpublic domain
Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM
Estate of Jones v. Phillips Ex Rel. Phillipspublic domain
992 So.2d 1131 (2008) ESTATE OF Venus JONES, M.D., Lance Wright, M.D. and Semmes-Murphy Clinic, Memphis Pathology Labs and Baptist Rapid Access Lab v. Tyson PHILLIPS, a minor, By and Through his Next Friend, Mary Jean PHILLIPS and Mary Jean Phillips, individually and as Conservator for Wilbert Phillips. No. 2006-CA-01898-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. August 28, 2008.
Waldorf v. Shutapublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT MANSMANN, Circuit Judge. In this appeal we are asked to decide whether the district court erred in denying defendants’ motions for a mistrial based on the jury’s inadvertent exposure to media coverage of a $30 million verdict awarded in a similar case. The defendant, the Borough of Kenilworth, argues that the jurors’ knowledge of the exact damage award in that case, involving similar
City of Dallas, Texas v. Arredondo, Anthonypublic domain
Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM
Lance Wright, M.D. v. Tyson Phillipspublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2006-CA-01898-SCT ESTATE OF VENUS JONES, M.D., LANCE WRIGHT, M.D. AND SEMMES-MURPHY CLINIC, MEMPHIS PATHOLOGY LABS AND BAPTIST RAPID ACCESS LAB v. TYSON PHILLIPS, A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HIS NEXT FRIEND, MARY JEAN PHILLIPS AND MARY JEAN PHILLIPS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CONSERVATOR FOR WILBERT PHILLIPS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/30/2002 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. KENNETH
Douglas v. Wainwrightpublic domain
KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge: Howard Virgil Lee Douglas was convicted by a Florida state court of murder in the first degree. In the second phase of. a bifurcated trial, the jury unanimously recommended life imprisonment, rejecting imposition of the death penalty. The trial judge, however, found that the murder was “especially heinous, atrocious and cruel,” that “no evidence of mitigating circumstances was produced,” and impose
Douglas v. Wainwrightpublic domain
714 F.2d 1532 9 Media L. Rep. 2457 Howard Virgil Lee DOUGLAS, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Secretary, Florida Department ofOffender Rehabilitation, and David H. Brierton,Superintendent of Florida State Prisonat Starke, Florida,Respondents-Appellees. No. 81-5927. United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit.
United States v. Mark Richard Powerspublic domain
McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I dissent. In my view, because the refusal of the court below to close the trial is not a final decision, we lack appellate jurisdiction over the case under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. However, the extraordinary nature of appellant’s claim, which involves both an allegedly life and death situation for him and a dramatically unsettled are
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 4/2/2015 10