Cases

586 F.3d 76 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Richard VILLAR, Defendant, Appellant. No. 08-1154. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard July 27, 2009. Decided November 10, 2009. *78 Mark L. Stevens, Esq., for appellant. Aixa Maldonado-Quiones, Assistant United States Attorney, wit

PETTIGREW, J. lain this workers’ compensation dispute, Industrial Metal Recyclers, Inc. (“Industrial”) and its insurer, The Gray Insurance Company (“Gray”), appeal a judgment of the Office of Workers’ Compensation (“OWC”) in favor of claimant, Maurice Vil-lar. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On July 18, 2000, Mr. Villar was injured in the course and

THOMPSON, C.J. This consolidated appeal is based on orders certified to be of great public importance by the county court. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company seeks review of orders determining that it may not defend against personal injury protection (PIP) claims of Nationwide’s insureds because Nationwide did not timely obtain reasonable proof that the medical procedures were unreasonable, unnecessary, or unrelated to

In two related child custody proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Balter, J.), dated November 29, 2001, which, after a hearing, awarded custody of the parties’ child to the father and established a visitation schedule. Ordered that the order is reversed, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Kings County, for a new h

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County [John J. Ark, J.], entered June 12, 2009) to review a determination of respondents. The determination denied the petition to amend to unfounded an indicated report of child maltreatment maintained in the New York State Central Register of Child Abuse and Maltreatment.

Smith, J. The defendant was indicted for trafficking in fourteen or more grams of cocaine and for conspiracy to traffic in cocaine. Prior to trial, the defendant filed a motion to suppress the evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant. After an evidentiary hearing, a Superior Court judge denied the suppression motion. A trial was held on the trafficking *743charge only

(2008) Frank GENER-VILLAR d/b/a Gener Advertising, Plaintiff v. ADCOM GROUP, INC., Debbie Alonso, President, Supermercado Mr. Special, Inc., Santos Alonso-Maldonado, President, Defendants. Civil No. 03-1306 (FAB/CVR). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. May 28, 2008. OPINION AND ORDER CAMILLE L. VELEZ-RIVE, United States Magistrate Judge.<

150 N.J. 503 (1997) 696 A.2d 674 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JUAN CARLOS VILLAR, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued April 29, 1997. Decided July 17, 1997. *506 Nicholas Ruggiero, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (Robert W. Gluck,

PER CURIAM. We reverse and remand with directions for further proceedings in accord with the decision of this court in Davar Corp. v. Tropic Land Improvement Corp., 330 So.2d 482 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). ANSTEAD, LETTS and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

PER CURIAM. Claimant appeals contending the deputy-commissioner erred in reducing the benefits payable to her by fifty percent (50%) in accordance with Section 440.15(3)(b)4., Florida Statutes (Supp.1982).1 Her contention that Section 440.15(3)(b)4. violates the equal protection clauses of both the federal and state constitutions has been rejected by the Florida Supreme Court in Morrow v. Amcon

(2008) Euripides DEL-VILLAR-ROSARIO, Plaintiff v. PUERTO RICO DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 06-2244 (JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. May 13, 2008. OPINION AND ORDER GARCIA-GREGORY, District Judge. Pending before the Court are several Motions to Dismiss (Docket Nos. 11, 12, 17, 20, 36, and 42). Furthe

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Nos. 92-7162, 93-7036. Nenita S. VILLAR, Etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CROWLEY MARITIME CORPORATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nenita S. VILLAR, Etc., et al., Plaintiffs,

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge: This suit is the third successive one that the plaintiffs have brought for the wrongful death of Renerio Z. Villar, a citizen of the Philippines. In the first two suits, California state and federal courts dismissed the plaintiffs’ suit based on forum non conveniens. Furthermore, the Ninth Circuit held that no forum in the United States would be convenient. Yet, over ten yea

780 F.Supp. 1467 (1992) Nenita S. VILLAR, Individually and as Personal Representative of Renerio Z. Villar, Deceased; Josephine Villar; Gerardo Villar; Reynaldo Villar, and Renerio Villar Jr., Plaintiffs, v. CROWLEY MARITIME CORPORATION; Crowley Maritime International, S.A.; Crowley Maritime International, S.A., d/b/a GTO Corporation, k/n/a WTO Corporation; Genstar Ltd., k/n/a Genstar Corporation; Fednav Ltd., successor in interest to Federal Com

990 F.2d 1489 1993 A.M.C. 2697, 25 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1442 Nenita S. VILLAR, Etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.CROWLEY MARITIME CORPORATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees.Nenita S. VILLAR, Etc., et al., Plaintiffs,Gary Riebschlager and Benton Musslewhite, Appellants,v.CROWLEY MARITIME CORPORATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 92-7162, 93-7036.

810 So.2d 514 (2002) NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. NU-BEST DIAGNOSTIC LABS, INC., etc., Appellee. Nos. 5D00-987, 5D00-1387, 00-1482. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. March 8, 2002. *515 Tracy Raffles Gunn of Fowler, White, Gillen, Boggs, Villareal & Banker, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.<

468 So.2d 483 (1985) BEST-MORRISON PROPERTIES, Appellant, v. Frank DENNISON, Appellee. No. 84-1941. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. May 8, 1985. Joseph M. Fasi, II, of Fowler, White, Gillen, Boggs, Villareal & Banker, P.A., Tampa, for appellant. Brian A. Bolves of Taub & Williams, P.A., Tampa, for appellee. FRANK, Judge.</

224 F.3d 256 (3rd Cir. 2000) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,v.ANGEL CEPERO a/k/a Angel Villar-Cepero a/k/a Mosquito Angel Cepero, Appellant. No. 99-3047 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT Argued March 6, 2000Re-Argued May 24, 2000Filed August 17, 2000 On Appeal from the United States District C

106 B.R. 58 (1989) NEW YORK CITY SHOES, INC. v. BEST SHOE CORP. Civ. A. No. 89-4246. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. September 22, 1989. *59 Pauline K. Morgan, Philadelphia, Pa., for debtor. Lawrence J. Lichtenstein, Bradley K. Moss, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendants. MEMORANDUM GIL

98 B.R. 725 (1989) In re NEW YORK CITY SHOES, INC., Debtor. NEW YORK CITY SHOES, INC., Plaintiff, v. BEST SHOE CORP. and First Footwear Corp., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 87-03426S, Adv. No. 88-2294S. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. April 14, 1989. *726 Pauline K. Morgan, Mary F. Walrath, Douglas J. Smillie,