Cases

20 So.3d 459 (2009) Alexander L. KAPLAN and Denise A. Kaplan, Petitioners, v. DIVOSTA HOMES, L.P., and Village Walk of Bonita Springs Homeowners Association, Inc., Respondents. No. 2D09-2292. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. November 4, 2009. *460 Alexander L. Kaplan of Alexander L. Kaplan, P.A., Naples, for

June 09, 2006 Mr. Craig Madison Patrick Craddock Reneker & Davis, L.L.P. 3100 Monticello Avenue, Suite 550 Dallas, TX 75205-3442 Honorable Patrick Edward Sebesta 239th District Court 111 E. Locust Street Angelton, TX 77515-4678 Mr. Douglas Vance Colvin Law Offices of Wes Griggs P.O. Box 517 West Columbia, TX 77486 RE: Case Number: 04-0490 Court of Appeals Number: 01-02-00370-CV Trial Court Number: 15655*JG01 Style: IN RE PALM HARBOR HOMES, INC. AND PALM HARBOR HOMES

236 S.W.3d 413 (2007) COUNTRY VILLAGE HOMES, INC., B & A Realty, Inc., M.B. Schauer Homes, Inc., Schauer Family Trust, and Monte B. Schauer, Appellants, v. Robert E. PATTERSON and Sherry Patterson, Appellees. No. 01-03-01240-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). August 16, 2007. *419 John W. Berkel, Robert A. Pl

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ════════════ No. 04-0490 ════════════

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS No. 04-0490 IN RE PALM HARBOR HOMES, INC. AND PALM HARBOR HOMES I, L.P. D/B/A PALM HARBOR VILLAGE On Petition for Writ of Mandamus ORDERED: 1. Relator's motion to stay underlying proceedings, filed November 8, 2004, is granted. All trial court proceedings are stayed pending further order of this Court. Done at the City of Austin, this 19

Palm Harbor Draft 1 30-03 Opinion issued December 31, 2003 In The Court of Appeals

Brown, Judge. [1] The Village Pines at the Pines of Greenwood Homeowners' Association, Inc., (the "HOA") appeals the trial court's entry of judgment on its claims for breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract in favor of Pines of Greenwood, LLC ("Pines") and Arbor Homes, LLC ("Arbor Homes"). Reviewing the trial court's findings and judgment under the clear error standard, we concl

OPINION OF THE COURT Scott Fairgrieve, J. The respondent, Matthew Kalter, moves by way of order to show cause to vacate the default money judgment against him dated October 20, 2008, in the amount of $7,728.60, and to dismiss the proceeding due to the petitioner’s failure to properly serve him. In the alternative, the respondent requests that the money judgment be vacated and that he be permitted to defend o

956 N.E.2d 183 (2011) HOMESTEAD FINANCE CORPORATION, Appellant-Defendant, v. SOUTHWOOD MANOR L.P. d/b/a Village Green of Southwood Manor and d/b/a Village Green Mobile Home Park, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 71A04-1103-CC-167. Court of Appeals of Indiana. October 26, 2011. Matthew A. Yeakey, Sanders • Pianowski, LLP, Elkhart, IN, Attorney for Appellant. Michael A.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Goldberg Cos., Inc. v. Richmond Hts. City Council (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 207, 690 N.E.2d 510, decided today. *260Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents.

195 S.W.3d 672 (2006) In re PALM HARBOR HOMES, INC., and Palm Harbor Homes I, L.P. d/b/a Palm Harbor Village, Relator. No. 04-0490. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued March 23, 2005. Decided June 9, 2006. *674 Craig Madison Patrick, Michael J. Craddock, Eric L. Lindstrom, Craddock Reneker & Davis, L.L.P., Dallas, for Rel

46 So.3d 1211 (2010) KOLTER SIGNATURE HOMES, INC., a foreign corporation, and Villager Realty Ltd., L.P., a foreign limited partnership, Appellants, v. Glenn G. SHENTON and Pamela A. Shenton, husband and wife, and Mauricio Martinez and Eliran Assulin, tenants in common, Appellees. No. 4D09-175. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. November 10, 2010.

*876 ORDER PER CURIAM: W.D. Gilmer appeals the trial court’s judgment granting Greenfield Village Homes Association and John Smith’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action. On appeal, Mr. Gilmer claims that the trial court erred in dismissing his petition because his action was not barred by the statute of limitations and

OPINION FRANK G. EVANS, Justice. This is an original proceeding for a writ of mandamus. Relators Palm Harbor Homes, Inc. (“Palm Harbor Homes”) and Palm Harbor Homes 1, L.P. d/b/a Palm Harbor Village (“Palm Harbor Village”), initiated this original action in April 2002, seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the Hon. J. Ray Gayle, then Judge of the 239th District Court in Brazoria County, to

54 P.3d 993 (2002) 132 N.M. 715 2002-NMSC-029 Rosalina AGUILERA, Petitioner-Respondent, v. PALM HARBOR HOMES, INC., d/b/a Masterpiece Housing, Newco Homes L.P., d/b/a Palm Harbor Village, Newco Homes, d/b/a C & S Magnahomes, Palm Harbor Homes, L.P., Masterpiece Housing and Newco Homes, Respondents-Petitioners. No. 27,144. Supreme Court of New Mexico.<

244 S.W.3d 570 (2008) ROYCE HOMES, L.P., Appellant, v. Mitch HUMPHREY, Appellee. No. 09-06-295 CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont. Submitted March 22, 2007. Decided January 3, 2008. *573 Shannon M. McAvoy, Kathleen Hopkins Alsina, Misty L. Pless, Patricia Hair, Phelps Dunbar LLP, Houston, for appellant.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Re: ECF No. 167 JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge Before the Court is Plaintiffs Ryan, Anne, and Reese Schaeffer’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Against Gregory Village Partners, L.P. (“Gregory Village”). ECF No. 167. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will-grant the motion in part. 1. BACKGRO

ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE JON S. TIGAR, District Judge Now before the Court is the parties’ discovery dispute regarding the applicability of the attorney-client privilege and work-product protection to the documents listed in Gregory Village Partners, LP and VPI, Inc.’s (collectively, “Gregory Village”) privilege log. See ECF No. 104. Having carefully reviewed the documents in camera

OPINION ARMIJO, Judge. {1} These consolidated appeals present us with the opportunity to examine the arbitration process in the context of the increasing demand for and dependence on methods of alternative dispute resolution. Specifically, we address the extent of an arbitrator’s authority under the Arbitration Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 44-7-1 to -22 (1971).1

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-06-295 CV