Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
17 opinions for “Vila v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.”
Domestic Fabrics Corp. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.public domain
325 F.Supp.2d 612 (2003) DOMESTIC FABRICS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO., Defendant. No. 4:00-CV-127-H(4). United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Eastern Division. September 15, 2003. Richard F. Landis, II, Wallace, Morris & Barwick, Kinston, NC, David E. Bennett, *613 Coats & Bennett, Ral
Domestic Fabrics Corp. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.public domain
326 F.Supp.2d 694 (2004) DOMESTIC FABRICS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO., Defendant. No. 4:00-CV-127-H(4). United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Eastern Division. June 25, 2004. *695 Richard F. Landis, II, P. C. Barwick, Jr., Wallace, Morris & Barwick, Kinston, NC, David E. Bennett, Coats &am;
Colón-Millín v. Sears Roebuck De Puerto Rico, Inc.public domain
LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. Nilda Colón-Millín (“Colón”) filed a tort action against Sears Roebuck of Puerto Rico, Luis Matos-Colón (“Matos”), his wife and their conjugal partnership, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, 1 asserting that a Sears van, driven by Matos, struck her as she was walking across a street in San Juan, P
Vila v. B. F. Goodrich Co.public domain
SCHWARTZ, Judge. The summary final judgment entered below in favor of the defendants, B. F. Goodrich Co. and Norton Tire Co., which is on appeal in case no. 78-2307, is reversed. Not only did the movants fail affirmatively and conclusively to establish the absence of liability as a matter of law, but the expert affidavit submitted in opposition to the motion demonstrated the existence of unresolved issues of material fact.
John W. Boyd, Jr. v. Kilpatrick Townsend & Stocktonpublic domain
Opinion for the court by Senior Judge BELSON. Opinion by Associate Judge McLeese, concurring in part, and dissenting in part, at page 84. Belson, Senior Judge: Appellant John W. Boyd, Jr., seeks reversal of trial court orders granting motions to dismiss brought under Superior Court Rule 12 (b)(6) by appellees Kilpa-trick Townsend & Stockton, LLP (Kilpa-trick
Gonzalez v. K-MMart Corp.public domain
585 F.Supp.2d 501 (2008) Zoraida GONZALEZ, Plaintiff, v. K-MART CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 05 Civ. 1139. United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 3, 2008. Weiser & Associates, by: Bernard A. Anderson, Esq., New York, NY, for Plaintiff. Simmons, Jannace & Stagg, L.L.P, by: Michael D. Kern, Esq., Syosset, NY, for Defendant.
Olsen v. Reuter (In re Reuter)public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION DENNIS R. DOW, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Motions to Dismiss of Nathan Paul Reuter (“Debtor”) and Kathleen S. Reuter (the “Motions”). This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334(b) and 157(a) and (b). This is a core proceeding which this Court may hear and determine pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) & (E). Fo
J.D. Fields & Co. v. Nucor-Yamato Steelpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge. Plaintiff J.D. Fields & Company, Inc. (“Fields”) brings this action against defendant Nucor-Yamato Steel Company (“NYS”), alleging violations of the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 13(a), and state-law claims of tortious interference, fraudulent misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation, conspiracy, and breach of contract.
Nickell v. Russellpublic domain
*114Per Curiam. This case involves an accident in which the defendant John Russell, while operating a pickup truck close to midnight on June 28, 1986, on West Princeton Road in Lancaster County, Nebraska, struck and injured the plaintiff, Lonnie Nickell. Nickell was lying down in the- middle of the gravel road. Following a directed verdict as to both Russell’s negligenc
Domínguez Castro Y Otros v. Gobiernopublic domain
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO Olga Domínguez Castro Sandra J. Guzmán Hernández, Militza López Mateo, Carlos Rivera Figueroa Recurridos Certiorari v. 2010 TSPR 22 Gobierno del Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico, Secretario de Justicia, 178 DPR ____ Honorable Luis Fortuño, Gobernador del Estado Libre Asoci
Shell Oil Co. v. Leftwichpublic domain
212 Va. 715 (1972) SHELL OIL COMPANY v. JEFFREY STEPHEN LEFTWICH. Record Nos. 7679 and 7680. Supreme Court of Virginia. March 6, 1972. Francis V. Lowden, Jr. (James A. Harper, Jr.; Paul M. Thompson; Hunton, Williams, Gay, Powell & Gibson, on brief), for appellant in Record Nos. 7679 and 7680. James A. Eichner (James M. Minor, Jr.; Henry H. McVey, III;
KILEY, Circuit Judge. This is a patent infringement suit by Heterochemical Corporation, of Ohio, seeking an injunction and accounting against United States Rubber Company, of New Jersey. After Heterochemical filed notice of appeal from the district court’s judgment against it, the patent expired so that the issue concerns only the q
Verner v. State of Colo.public domain
533 F.Supp. 1109 (1982) Robert J. VERNER a/k/a Robert John Verner, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF COLORADO, Supreme Court of State of Colorado, Board of Continuing Legal Education of the State of Colorado, Colorado State Board of Law Examiners, Grievance Committee of the Supreme Court of the State of Colorado, Paul V. Hodges, George Lohr, Jean Dubofsky, Luis D. Rovira, Joseph R. Quinn, Robert B. Lee, William H. Erickson, James R. Carrigan, Edward E. Prin
Rauch v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.public domain
Garrett, J. This is a law action in which plaintiff, Myrtle Rauch, sought to recover damages on account of injuries sustained by her when gas which escaped from a defective water heater exploded. The plaintiff, hereinafter referred to as appellee, and her husband rented and on June 30, 1957, moved into the Lee Beeson property in Salix, Iowa. Appellee alleged the explosion was caused by the malfunctioning of the safety pilot valve
John Rooff & Sons, Inc. v. Winterbottompublic domain
Garfield, J. Plaintiff sued defendant at law upon an account stated for the balance owing plaintiff for labor and mate*125rial furnished defendant in the construction of a. building and other improvements. The correctness of plaintiff’s claim is conceded. Defendant pleaded in his answer a setoff and, in two counts, a counterclaim for negligently causing the destruction by
Peoples Gas & Electric Co. v. State Tax Commissionpublic domain
Plaintiff Kansas City Power and Light Company owned and plaintiff Peoples Gas Electric Company operated a powerhouse and electric generating plant at Mason City, with connected lines furnishing electricity in said city and to several adjacent industrial plants, and to an electric railway, and in or to thirteen neighboring towns; also about six hundred twenty-five miles of rural lines serving about sixteen hundred rural customers in five counties in northern Iowa. They also owned and operated
In the Matter of Oil Spill by the Amoco Cadiz Off the Coast of France on March 16, 1978public domain
PER CURIAM. On the morning of March 16, 1978, the supertanker Amooo Cadiz broke apart in a severe storm, spewing most of its load of 220,000 tons of Iranian crude into the seas off Brittany. The wreck resulted in one of the largest oil spills in history, damaging approximately 180 miles of coastline in one of the most important tourist and fishing regions in France. The clean