Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

PER CURIAM: Mark W. Ciaravella, appointed counsel for Edwin Vidal Torres in this direct appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). In a pro se response to counsel’s motion to withdraw, Torres requests that counsel’s motion be denied or that new counsel be appointed to brief his appeal. Our independent review of the entire record reveals th

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL VIII WAVES AND SANDS, INC., Apelación acogida JB FELLOWSHIP INC. como Certiorari HNC LIFEGUARDS OF procedente del THE REEF Tribunal de Primera

MEMORANDUM ** Vidal Torres appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 30-month sentence imposed for illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Torres’s attorney has filed a brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Torres has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

397 B.R. 158 (2008) Rosa M. TORRES MARTINEZ, Debtor. Rosa M. Torres Martinez, Appellant, v. Wilfredo Rivera Arce, Appellee. BAP No. 07-035. Bankruptcy No. 02-06538-SEK. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit. December 1, 2008. *160 Francisco J. Ramos Gonzalez, Esq., and Jaime L. Velasco Bonilla II, Esq.

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas November 13, 2015 No. 04-15-00414-CV Jose "Joe" HINOJOSA, Appellant v. FIREFIGHTERS & POLICE OFFICERS' CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAREDO, TEXAS; Irma Mireles, Vidal Cantu, Jr.

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-15-00414-CV Jose (Joe) HINOJOSA, Appellant v. FIREFIGHTERS AND POLICE OFFICERS’ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAREDO, TEXAS; Irma

El Juez Asociado Señor Rebollo López emitió la opinión del Tribunal El 23 de agosto de 1996, Julio Francisco Juliá Padró, Stella Maris Molina Rosario y la Sociedad Legal de Ganan-ciales compuesta por ambos, demandaron, ante la Sala Superior de Bayamón del Tribunal de Primera Instancia, a Epifanio Vidal, S.E. y a Herederos Vidal Nadal, Inc., entre otros, alegando nulidad de contrato por vicios en el consen-timie

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas JUDGMENT No. 04-15-00414-CV Jose (Joe) HINOJOSA, Appellant v. FIREFIGHTERS AND POLICE OFFICERS’ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAREDO, TEXAS; Irma Mireles, Vidal Cantu J

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas September 8, 2015 No. 04-15-00414-CV Jose "Joe" HINOJOSA, Appellant v. FIREFIGHTERS & POLICE OFFICERS' CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE

Firefighters & Police Officers' Civil Service Commission of the City of Laredo, Texas; Irma Mireles, Vidal Cantu, Jr. & /s

FERGUSON, Judge (dissenting). In Restrepo v. State, 438 So.2d 76 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), we held that consent was not effective when police officers requested of a Spanish-speaking suspect permission to search “con su permiso,” which translates literally to “with your permission.” Here the defendant consented to a search in response to a similar request; however, this request, which is literally translat

67 F.Supp.2d 35 (1999) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Allyson VIDAL-CRUZ, et al., Defendants. Nos. 98-277(CCC), 98-279(HL), 98-280(DRD), 98-282(DRD), 98-283(PG), 98-284(SEC), 98-285(PG), 98-287(CCC), 98-289(DRD), 98-290(DRD), 98-291(HL), 98-292(CCC), 98-297(CCC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 1, 1999.

433 F.Supp.2d 1028 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Ernesto TORRES-MONJE and Vidal Rivera-Rocha, Defendants. No. 1:06-CR-018. United States District Court, D. North Dakota, Southwestern Division. May 22, 2006. *1029 William Delaney Schmidt, Federal Public Defender Office, Paul H. Myerchin, Bormann Law Office, Bismar

FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 09/18/15 10:36:19 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/18/2015 10:36:19 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk

363 F.Supp.2d 7 (2005) IRIZARRY-LOPEZ, et al., Plaintiff(s) v. TORRES-GONZALEZ, et al., Defendant(s). Civil No. 01-1616 (JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 18, 2005. Pablo Landrau-Pirazzi, Ivan M. Castro-Ortiz, Eliezer Aldarondo-Ortiz, Claudio Aliff-Ortiz, Aldarondo & Lopez Bras, Hato Rey, PR, for Plaintiffs. Johanna M. Emmanuelli-H

ACCEPTED 04-15-00414-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 11/6/2015

ACCEPTED 04-15-00414-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/10/2015 4:31:13 PM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/10/2015 4:31:13 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Ruben Torres-Robles raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANT

El Juez Asociado Señor Torres Rigual emitió la opinión del Tribunal. Varios oficiales del Cuerpo de la Policía instaron demanda contra el Superintendente fundada en que éste les había re-tirado y pensionado de ese Cuerpo mientras estaban reci-biendo tratamiento médico del Fondo del Seguro del Estado como consecuencia de accidentes sufridos en el curso del em-pleo. El tribunal de instancia declaró con lugar la