Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
11 opinions for “Vida F Negrete v. Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America”
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DECERTIFY THE CLASS CHRISTINA A. SNYDER, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In these related class action cases, plaintiffs Vida F. Negrete (“Negrete”), as conservator for Everett Ow (“Ow”), and Carolyn B. Healey (“Healey”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and a nationwide class of an estimated 200,000 senior citizens, allege that defendan
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS CHRISTINA A. SNYDER, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In these related class action cases, plaintiffs Vida F. Negrete (“Negrete”), as conservator for Everett Ow (“Ow”), and Carolyn B. Healey (“Healey”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and a nationwide class of an estimated 200,000 senior citizens, allege tha
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S THIRD MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CHRISTINA A. SNYDER, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In these related class action cases, plaintiffs Vida F. Negrete (“Negrete”), as conservator for Everett Ow (“Ow”), and Carolyn B. Healey (“Healey”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and a nationwide class of an estimated 200,0
523 F.3d 1091 (2008) Vida F. NEGRETE, as Conservator for Everett E. Ow, an individual and on behalf of all other similarly situated persons, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALLIANZ LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, a Minnesota corporation, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-55505. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 8, 2008. Filed A
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION (filed May 30, 2006) SNYDER, District Judge. I. BACKGROUND A. Proceedings In these related class action cases, plaintiffs Vida F. Negrete (“Negrete”), as conservator for Everett Ow (“Ow”), and Carolyn B. Healey (“Healey”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and a proposed nat
OPINION PER CURIAM: Intervenor Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America (“Allianz”) appeals the district court’s order denying its motion to unseal judicial records.1 Because the records at issue were filed in connection with pending summary judgment motions, we reverse and remand to the district court to grant the motion. I
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VIDA F. NEGRETE, as Conservator for EVERETT E. OW, an individual and on behalf of all other similarly situated persons, No. 07-55505 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.C. No. CV-05-06838-CAS ALLIANZ LIFE INSURANCE OPINION COMPANY OF NORT
Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America ("Allianz") petitions for a writ of mandamus directing the Barbour Circuit Court to vacate its orders to compel production of certain discovery documents for an individual plaintiff in a fraud case involving the sale of an annuity. The requested documents were produced in class actions in California and in Minnesota, and Allianz alleges that the documents are patently irrelevant or duplicative. For the reasons discussed below, we deny th
In Re Allianz Life Insurance Co. of North Americapublic domain
517 F.Supp.2d 1364 (2007) In re: ALLIANZ LIFE INSURANCE CO. OF NORTH AMERICA DEFERRED ANNUITY MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION. MDL No. 1884. United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. October 10, 2007. Before JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman, D. LOWELL HENSEN, J. FREDERICK MOTZ, ROBERT L. MILLER, JR., KATHRYN H. VRATIL, DAVID R. HANSEN, ANTHONY J. SCIRIC
Midland Nat'l Life Ins. Co. V.public domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re MIDLAND NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO ANNUITY SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION, ESTATE OF JOHN G MIGLIACCIO; CARMEN MIGLIACCIO; MARY P. MUNOZ; ROBERT D. KAISER, On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated; NANCY BENDZAK, as attorney-in-fact for Mary Bendzak; MARY BENDZAK, individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, No. 11-55369
ACCEPTED 05-15-00369-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 9/8/2015 6:10:20 PM