Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
16 opinions for “Victorian v. Manuel”
United States v. Victorianpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** George Donald Victorian appeals the 42-month sentence imposed after the district court revoked his supervised release under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3). We affirm. Be*633cause the parties are familiar with the facts and procedural background, we do not recite them here. Our cases have consistently held that “imposition of
Brian Victorian v. Statepublic domain
ACCEPTED 01-13-01004-CR FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 2/10/2015 2:39:
Plaisance v. Louisiana State Penitentiarypublic domain
PARROT, J. IgManuel Plaisance, an inmate in the custody of the Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections (DPSC), appeals a judgment dismissing his petition for judicial review on the grounds that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over his claims. Based on our review of the facts and law in this case, we affirm the judgment, but on different grounds. ANALYSIS OF FACTS AND LAW</
William Delacruz v. Statepublic domain
ACCEPTED 01-14-00606-CR FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS
Albert Torres Nieves v. Statepublic domain
ACCEPTED 01-14-00294-CR FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/29/2015 3:3
Randy Allen Segura v. Statepublic domain
ACCEPTED 01-14-00955-CR FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/19/2015 8:30
Eladio Castro Najera v. Statepublic domain
ACCEPTED 14-14-00400-CR FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 2/18/2015
Yazdani-Beioky v. Sharifanpublic domain
Marc W. Brown, Justice This appeal and cross-appeal arise from a partnership and an August 2008 oral agreement for appellee/cross-appellant Abdee Sharifan to sell his forty-percent limited-partnership interest in Metro Hospitality Partners, Ltd. (MHP), to appellant/cross-appellee *817Shabahram Yazdani-Beioky (Yazdani) for $12.5 million. Additio
Knife Rights, Inc. v. Bontapublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KNIFE RIGHTS, INC.; ELIOT No. 24-5536 KAAGAN; JIM MILLER; D.C. No. GARRISON HAM; NORTH 3:23-cv-00474- COUNTY SHOOTING CENTER, JES-DDL INC.; PWGG, LP, Southern District
State v. Warrenpublic domain
558 So.2d 55 (1990) STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Kathleen Denise WARREN and Thomas George Secchiari, Appellees. No. 88-02884. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. January 19, 1990. Rehearing Denied March 15, 1990. Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and David R. Gemmer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant. M
218 Cal.App.3d 517 (1990) 267 Cal. Rptr. 158 JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. FAIR EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING COMMISSION, Defendant and Appellant; QUEEN ELIZABETH FOSTER, Real Party in Interest and Respondent. Docket No. G007029. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three. February 28, 1990.
Averette v. Jordanpublic domain
457 So.2d 691 (1984) Violet Jordan AVERETTE, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Mamie Owens JORDAN, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 16076-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. September 26, 1984. Dissenting Opinion October 31, 1984. *692 Theus, Grisham, Davis & Leigh by Paul D. Spillers, Monroe,
Michael M. v. Superior Courtpublic domain
25 Cal.3d 608 (1979) MICHAEL M. Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SONOMA COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest. Docket No. S.F. 23929. Supreme Court of California. November 5, 1979. *609 COUNSEL Gregory F. Jilka and Teresa de la O for Petitioner. Marteen J. Miller, Public Defender (Sonoma), and L
Cordrey v. Steamshippublic domain
BEAN, J., Dissenting in Part. — I heartily concur in the able opinion of Mr. Chief Justice Burnett on what might be termed the main question in the case, to the effect that the statute upon which this litigation is based is not unconstitutional, and does not infringe upon the federal law. I am unable to give my assent to the proposition that the action is cognizable only as a suit in equity for the foreclosure of a lien. I am cons
San Juan Fruit Co. v. Carrillopublic domain
BINGHAM, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from a decree of the federal District Court for Porto Rico dismissing a bill in equity brought by the San Juan Fruit Company, a New York corporation, against some 48 individual defendants, citizens of the United States resident and domiciled in Porto Rico. The bill alleges that the plaintiff is the owner in fee and entitled to immediate possession of a tract of' land
M. Witmark & Sons v. Fred Fisher Music Co.public domain
125 F.2d 949 (1942) M. WITMARK & SONS v. FRED FISHER MUSIC CO., Inc., et al. No. 123. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. February 11, 1942. Stuart H. Aarons, of New York City (R. W. Perkins, of New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee. John Schulman, of New York City (Hays, St. John, Abramson & Schulman and Milton Sargoy, all of New