Cases

SULLIVAN, Justice. An owner of an Indiana business has long had the absolute right to exclude a visitor or customer, subject only to applicable civil rights laws. This long-standing common law right of private property owners extends to the operator of a riverboat casino that wishes to exelude a patron for employing strategies designed to give the patron a statistical advantage over the ca-gino. The Riverboat Gambling Act, w

This appeal involves the validity of an agreement between a divorced husband and wife which settled all past due and future child support payments for a sum considerably less than that due or to become due under the original divorce decree made by the court some years previously. The trial judge allowed recovery of child support accrued and unpaid to the date of the agreement, i.e., from the date of divorce decree on July 3, 1974 to the date of agreement, June 15, 1984, but denied pro

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Marc S. Sedwick Peter J. Rusthoven Indianapolis, Indiana Paul L. Jefferson Matthew S. Winings Indianapolis, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR AMICUS CURIAE

947 N.E.2d 912 (2011) STATE of Indiana, Appellant (Plaintiff below), v. Charles BOYLE, Appellee (Defendant below). No. 49S05-1105-PC-305. Supreme Court of Indiana. May 26, 2011. Gregory F. Zoeller, Attorney General of Indiana, Cynthia L. Ploughe, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellant. Victoria L. Bailey, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney

194 F.Supp.2d 704 (2002) VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ARTCO EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC., et al., Defendants. No. C-2-01-198. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. March 27, 2002. *705 *706 *707

PER CURIAM. The trial court’s final, appealable order revoking Dawson’s probation and ordering him to serve six years in the Department of Correction was entered in April 2009. Some eight months later, the trial court granted Dawson permission to file a belated notice of appeal pursuant to Post-Conviction Rule 2. The rule allows belated appeals in cer

933 N.E.2d 1271 (2010) Max KOENIG, Appellant (Defendant below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff below). No. 42S04-1009-CR-505. Supreme Court of Indiana. September 21, 2010. *1272 Victoria L. Bailey, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellant. Gregory F. Zoeller, Attorney General of Indiana, George P. Sherman, Deputy

942 N.E.2d 809 (2011) Richard JOSLYN, Appellant (Defendant below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff below). No. 49S04-1102-CR-85. Supreme Court of Indiana. February 16, 2011. *810 Victoria L. Bailey, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellant. Gregory F. Zoeller, Attorney General of Indiana, Ann L. Goodwin, Special D

928 N.E.2d 202 (2010) Walker WHATLEY, Appellant (Defendant below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff below). No. 49S02-0908-CR-379. Supreme Court of Indiana. June 8, 2010. *203 Victoria L. Bailey, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellant. Gregory F. Zoeller, Attorney General of Indiana, Angela N. Sanchez, Deputy Att

U.S. District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey These two consolidated civil-rights suits primarily allege First Amendment free-speech claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department and two of its supervising officers (collectively Metro or the department). Plaintiffs John Sabatini and

671 F.Supp.2d 215 (2009) WORLD ENERGY ALTERNATIVES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. SETTLEMYRE INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 09-10480-NMG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. November 16, 2009. *216 Shepard Davidson, Victoria L. Walton, Burns & Levinson LLP, Boston, MA, for Plaintiff. David C. Barrett, T

Córdova Arone, Juez Ponente TEXTO COMPLETO DE LA SENTENCIA Los demandantes en el caso de epígrafe recurren ante nos apelando una sentencia del entonces Tribunal Superior, Sala de Ponce donde se declara sin lugar una demanda contra el Departamento de Hacienda, y se establece que el Departamento tiene derecho a cobrar ciertas contribuciones *1172ade

866 N.E.2d 767 (2007) Adrian REED, Appellant (Petitioner Below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Respondent Below). No. 49S04-0705-PC-209. Supreme Court of Indiana. May 22, 2007. *768 Susan K. Carpenter, Public Defender of Indiana, Victoria Christ, Deputy Public Defender, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellant. Steve Car

849 N.E.2d 578 (2006) Dorsey MATHEWS, Appellant (Defendant below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff below). No. 49S02-0509-PC-405. Supreme Court of Indiana. June 28, 2006. *580 Victoria Ursulskis, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellant. Steve Carter, Attorney General of Indiana, Michael Gene Worden, Deputy Attorn

865 N.E.2d 612 (2007) CITY OF CARMEL, Indiana, Appellant (Defendant below), v. Carl Michael STEELE and Victoria A. Russo-Steele, Appellees (Complainants below). No. 29S02-0604-CV-139. Supreme Court of Indiana. May 2, 2007. *614 Nicholas K. Kile, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Indianapolis, IN, Douglas C. Haney, City of Carmel, Depar

759 N.E.2d 631 (2001) Michael W. GATES, Appellant (Defendant Below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff Below). No. 49S00-0011-CR-633. Supreme Court of Indiana. December 20, 2001. Victoria Ursulskis, Indianapolis, for Appellant. Steve Carter, Attorney General of Indiana, Christopher L. Lafuse, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, for Appellee.

376 F.Supp.2d 141 (2005) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff(s) v. Leonardo HILARIO HILARIO, Kennedi Martinez, Fernando Jose Milan, Delgadino Peguero, Santiago Rodriguez, Defendant(s). No. Crim 04-405(JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. June 28, 2005. *142 Jacabed Rodriguez-Coss, Dina Avila-Jimenez, United States

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 565 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 566 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT

741 N.E.2d 1197 (2001) Collis Dean SIVELS, Appellant (Defendant Below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff Below). No. 49S00-9908-CR-455. Supreme Court of Indiana. January 29, 2001. *1198 Victoria Ursulskis, Indianapolis, Indiana, Attorney for Appellant. Karen M. Freeman-Wilson, Attorney General of Indiana, Christoph

960 F.Supp. 456 (1997) DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. ALTAVISTA TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant. No. 96-12192-NG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. March 12, 1997. *457 *458 Shepard M. Remis, Victoria C. DeMaret, Goodwin, Procter & Hoar, Boston, MA, for Digital Equi