Cases

185 Ga. App. 752 (1988) 365 S.E.2d 544 HOPKINS v. MARTIN. 75426. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided February 8, 1988. Larry N. Hollington, for appellant. Jack E. Boone, Jr., Victor C. Hawk, for appellee. CARLEY, Judge. Appellee fell while working as a roofer. As a result of his injuries, appellee filed a c

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE HEARD AT COOKEVILLE1 June 2, 2004 Session SYNTHIA M. HOPKINS v. VICTOR L. HOPKINS Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals Chancery Court for Montgomery County No. 2001-01-0072 Carol Catalano, Chancellor

Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas JUDGMENT Victor Hugo Torres, Appellant Appeal from the 8th District Court of Hopkins County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. No. 06-22-00135-CR v. 2229242). Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Steven

*448OPINION JANICE M. HOLDER, J„ delivered the opinion of the court, in which FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, C.J., and E. RILEY ANDERSON, and ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., JJ., joined. WILLIAM M. BARKER, J., filed a dissenting opinion. The issue in this case is whether child support may be awarded when neither party has been

890 F.Supp. 844 (1995) Clarence VICTOR, Petitioner, v. Frank X. HOPKINS, Warden, Respondent. No. 4:CV94-3263. United States District Court, D. Nebraska. June 15, 1995. *845 Rick D. Lange, Rembolt Ludtke & Berger, Lyle J. Koenig, Lincoln, NE, for petitioner. Don Stenberg, Atty. Gen., J. Kirk Brown, Kimberly A. Klein, As

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 00-2697 ___________ Robert E. Hunt, Jr., * * Petitioner-Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the

In the Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-22-00135-CR VICTOR HUGO TORRES, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 8th District Court Hopkins County, Texas Trial Court No. 2229242 Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ. Opinion by Chief Justice Stevens

BOWMAN, Circuit Judge: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) (1994), the District Court has certified the following question for our consideration: Can and should a federal district court in a federal habeas corpus action involving the death penalty hold the federal case in abeyance, retaining jurisdiction and maintaining the stay against execution, t

BEAM, Circuit Judge. Victor Carter filed this petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He asserts that he received ineffective assistance of counsel and was denied his Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial. The district court 1 denied habeas corpus relief. We affirm. I. BACKGROU

Mercier, Judge. On December 15, 2014, the vehicle driven by Victor Lamont Mobley collided with a vehicle driven by W. M. W. M. and the passenger in his vehicle, C. F., were killed in the collision. Mobley was charged with reckless driving, two counts of homicide by vehicle in the first degree (alleging that he caused the deaths of W. M. and C. F. through the act of reckless driving), an

[Cite as Cleveland v. Hopkins, 2012-Ohio-5170.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION Nos. 97600 and 97601 CITY OF CLEVELAND PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.

___________ No. 95-2782 ___________ Victor Carter, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the District * of Nebraska. Frank X. Hopkins,

___________ No. 95-2801 ___________ Clarence Victor, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Frank X. Hopkins, *

Opinion issued December 5, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00813-CR NO. 01-23-00814-CR ——————————— VICTOR DERICK DAROSA, II, Appellant

PD-0229-15 No. __________________ __________________________________________ In the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals _______________________________________ Victor James Vargas Appellant, v. March 2, 2015 The State of Texas

DECISION RE: THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT Marvin J. Garbis, United States District Judge The Court has before it Defendants’ Motion Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and (6) to Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint [ECF No. 133] and the materials submitted relating thereto. The Court has held a hearing and had the benefit of the arguments of counsel. 1. BACKGROUND1<

MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), Jul 22 2016, 8:46 am this Memorandum Decision shall not be CLERK regarded as precedent or cited before any Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals court except for the

OPINION OF THE COURT Caesar D. Cirigliano, J. This court presided over the trial of the above-captioned defendants. They and codefendant Calvin Rivers were indicted for robbery in the first degree, two counts of robbery in the second degree and related crimes predicated on the three of them, acting in concert, having robbed Ravon Pierce at knife point on January 7, 2001 in the vicinity of 542 Morris Avenu

BYE, Circuit Judge. Frank X. Hopkins (hereinafter the Warden) appeals a district court 2 order that allowed Robert E. Hunt, Jr., to dismiss his second amended petition for a writ of ha-beas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Warden appeals that part of the order granting Hunt leave to file a third amended 'petition — th

Opinion by Hoffman, J., Appellant contends that Article I, section 27 of the Pennsylvania Constitution compels the courts to extend the right to consortium to women who have long been denied that right under the common law.1 Consortium has normally been defined in terms of a husband’s right to be secure in his marital relationship : “ Tor an injury to the wife, ei