⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Veronica Rojas”

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2022-02-03 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-20-00185-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG VERONICA ACOSTA, Appellant, v. NATHANIEL MARTINEZ, Appellee. On appeal from the 111th District Court
People v. Rojaspublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2013-11-26 · Published · cited 1× · 2013 IL App (1st) 113780
ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court People v. Rojas, 2013 IL App (1st) 113780 Appellate Court THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Caption JUAN ROJAS, Defendant-Appellee. District & No. First District, Fourth Division Docket No. 1-11-3780 Filed October 10, 2013 Held
Flores v. Gonzalespublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007-03-01 · Published · cited 0× · 223 F. App'x 696
MEMORANDUM ** Jaime Peralta Flores and Katia Veronica Marin Rojas, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals summarily affirming an immigration judge’s decision denying their applications for cancellation of removal.1 We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the agency’s physical presence determinati
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-09-28 · Published · cited 0× · 333 F. App'x 242
MEMORANDUM ** Celia Veronica Secaida Chinchilla, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance of *243counsel. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen,
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-09-28 · Published · cited 0× · 333 F. App'x 242
MEMORANDUM ** Celia Veronica Secaida Chinchilla, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance of *243counsel. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen,
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987-07-21 · Published · cited 0× · 510 So. 2d 1030; 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9451
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Champion v. Gray, 478 So.2d 17 (Fla.1985); Brown v. Cadillac Mo*1031tor Car Div., 468 So.2d 903 (Fla.1985); Styles v. Y.D. Taxi Cory., 426 So.2d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2013-04-17 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 17, 2013 NO. 03-11-00113-CV Kyle L. Janek, M.D., Successor to Thomas Suehs, in his Official Capacity as Executive Commissioner of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Appellant v. Octavia Gonzalez, Dulce Hernandez, Amalia Guedea-Nelson, Laura Guzman, S.J.M., N.L.T., Laura C
People v. Gonzalespublic domain
California Supreme Court · 2011-06-02 · Published · cited 151× · 51 Cal. 4th 894; 253 P.3d 185; 126 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1; 2011 Cal. LEXIS 5437
WISEMAN, J.,* Concurring and Dissenting. I concur with the majority’s conclusion that there was no reversible error in the guilt phase portion of the trial. I also agree that portions of the prosecutor’s letter to Genny Rojas were “plainly improper.” (Maj. opn., ante, at p. 952.) I disagree, however, with the majority’s holding that the reading of the letter w
State v. Spanglerpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2007-12-21 · Published · cited 12× · 173 P.3d 656; 38 Kan. App. 2d 817; 2007 Kan. App. LEXIS 1164
173 P.3d 656 (2007) STATE of Kansas, Appellee, v. Veronica J. SPANGLER, Appellant. No. 96,326. Court of Appeals of Kansas. December 21, 2007. *659 Randall L. Hodgkinson, of Kansas Appellate Defender Office, for appellant. Eric Godderz, county attorney, and Paul J. Morrison, attorney general, for appellee. Before BUS
District Court, District of Columbia · 2012-04-06 · Published · cited 31× · 853 F. Supp. 2d 118; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48674; 2012 WL 1142555
MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge. On September 8, 2010, Plaintiff Brenda Grissom triggered the alarm on a metal detector she was passing through while entering the Reeves Center in the District of Columbia. Officer Rockwell Phillips, an employee of AlliedBarton Security Services who appeared to be following the instructions of Distric
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022-11-23 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1079 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2023-02-28 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued February 28, 2023 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00112-CR ——————————— WILLIAM DENON SMITH, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
District Court, D. Minnesota · 2007-10-23 · Published · cited 28× · 267 F.R.D. 257; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97773; 2007 WL 7072423
ORDER JANIE S. MAYERON, United States Magistrate Judge. The above matter came on before the undersigned upon plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel and for Sanctions [Docket No. 84] and defendants’ Motion to Compel [Docket No. 102], Justin Cummins, Esq. appeared on behalf of plaintiffs; Jacqueline Mrachek, Esq. and Nancy Brasel, Esq. appeared on behalf of defendants. The Court, upon all o
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998-10-14 · Published · cited 3× · 718 So. 2d 394; 1998 WL 712818
718 So.2d 394 (1998) Veronica A. TOMLINSON-McKENZIE, and Crestland Mortgage, Co., Inc., Appellants, v. Pamela P. PRINCE and Michael E. Prince, her husband, Appellees. Nos. 97-3628, 98-0991. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. October 14, 1998. *395 John H. Richards and Warren B. Kwavnick of Cooney, Mattson, Lanc
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2025-08-27 · Published · cited 0×
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-22-00697-CV IN RE ESTATE OF Robert S. CASTLEMAN, Deceased From the Probate Court No. 2, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017-PC-1224 Honorable Veronica Vasquez, Judge
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2011-09-20 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-10-00876-CV Janet Elder and Blaine Elder, Appellants v.
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2011-09-20 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-10-00876-CV Janet Elder and Blaine Elder, Appellants v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 146TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 240,093-B, HONORABLE RICK MORRIS, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDU
People v. Estavezpublic domain
New York Supreme Court · 2015-01-20 · Published · cited 1× · 47 Misc. 3d 497; 1 N.Y.S.3d 777
OPINION OF THE COURT Daniel P. Conviser, J. The defendant was convicted following a jury trial presided over by this court of one count of assault in the second degree and five counts of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree. The trial evidence indicated that on the evening of December 27, 2013, a uniformed police officer, Arthur McCarthy, observed the defendant apparently attempt t
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022-07-18 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1119 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT