Cases

In re Breaux, Clyde J.; Breaux, Veronica Marin; Marin III, Engsfeld F.; Marin Sr., Donald et ah; — Plaintiff(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Mary, 16th Judicial District Court Div. E, Nos. 112908, 112908; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2008-CA-1724. Granted.

VICTORY, J.* JjWe granted writ applications in this oilfield contamination “legacy litigation”1 primarily to consider complicated issues of prescription, subsequent purchaser rights, restoration obligations, punitive damages, and ground water remediation obligations. After considering the record and the applicable law, we find the lower courts erred in applying the do

In re Exxon Mobil Corporation; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Mary, 16th Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 112908-E; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2008 CA 1724. Granted.

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § Gabriel Marin, § No. 08-19-00186-CR Appellant, § Appeal from the v. § County Criminal Court No. 4 The State of Texas,

MEMORANDUM ** Jaime Peralta Flores and Katia Veronica Marin Rojas, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals summarily affirming an immigration judge’s decision denying their applications for cancellation of removal.1 We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the agency’s physical presence determinati

28 So.3d 262 (2010) Donald MARIN, Sr., Engsfeld F. Marin, III, Clyde J. Breaux and Veronica Marin Breaux v. EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, Formerly Known as and Successor in Interest to Exxon Corporation and Humble Oil & Refining Company, Atlantic Richfield Company, Legacy Resources Co., L.P., MJF Property Management, L.L.C. and Mike Bourgeois. No. 2009-C-2368. Supreme Court of Louisiana.

OPINION MOORE, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Veronica McQueen (“McQueen”), mother of the decedent Jane Doe (“Doe”), 1 appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in the underlying § 1988 action to DefendantsAppellees Alicia Judd (“Judd”) Jimmie Hughes (“Hughes”), and the Beech

(3) payments, incentives and/or prizes received from Genuine Title; (4) communications with Genuine Title without any limitations; and (5) First Mariner's relationship with Genuine Title. (Bezek , Mem. 7-8, ECF No. 4-2 (citing First Mariner Subpoena, Ex. 1).) Genuine Title went bankrupt in 2014, and Plaintiffs' counsel, Smith, G

Motions for En Banc Reconsideration Denied as Moot; Opinion of December 28, 2018 Withdrawn; Affirmed as Modified in Part, Reversed and Rendered in Part, Reversed and Remanded in Part, and Substitute Opinion Filed April 2, 2019. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-16-00962-CV JANG WON CHO, Appellant V. KUN SIK KIM AND VERONICA YOUNG LE

OPINION Sharon McCally, Justice An automobile dealership employee filed a sexual-harassment complaint; shortly thereafter, she was terminated for theft. The employee sued the dealership for sexual harassment, retaliatory discharge, and defamation. The dealership counterclaimed for theft, conversion, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraud. A jury found in fav

Affirmed as Modified in Part, Reversed and Rendered in Part, Reversed and Remanded in Part, and Opinion Filed December 28, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-16-00962-CV JANG WON CHO, Appellant V. KUN SIK KIM AND VERONICA YOUNG LEE, LEGAL HEIR TO PATRICK HIY CHANG LEE, Appellees

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. Veronica Matos holds a judgment for some $25,000 (including legal fees) in this Title VII action against Richard A. Nellis, Inc., her former employer. Collection has been difficult. The firm is defunct. Matos suspects that its treasury was drained by Richard Nellis, its manager and owner, and its business transferred to other firms that Nellis control

ORDER DAVID C. NORTON, District Judge. This matter is before the court upon two motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The first motion was brought by Defendant ILA Local 1771 (Clerks and Checkers) (“Union” or “Local 1771”), and the second motion was brought by Defendants South Carolina Stevedores Association (“SCSA”), Ceres Marine

RALPH B. GUY, Jr., Circuit Judge. Petitioner, Veronica Craddock, appeals the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) which denied her request for a waiver from deportation. Upon a review of the record, we conclude the BIA did not abuse its discretion, and we affirm. I. Petitioner is a resident alien who, on February 25,1991, was convicted of conspiracy

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1099 John Donnellan (appellant) is a police officer employed by real party in interest and respondent City of Novato. He filed a petition for a peremptory writ of mandate pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure1 section 1094.5, see

323 F.Supp.2d 262 (2004) ESTATE OF Felix Giomard RIVERA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DOCTOR SUSONI HOSPITAL INC., et al., Defendants. No. CIV. 02-1407(PG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. June 24, 2004. *263 *264 Ricardo Ruiz-Diaz, Ruiz & Reyes Law Offices, Fajardo, PR, for Estate

BIRCH, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-appellant, Dadeland Station Associates (“Dadeland”) appeals the dismissal of their claim against defendants-appellees, St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co. and American Home Assurance Co. (collectively, “Sureties”) for bad faith in refusing to settle claims involving the performance bond they issued on the contractor of one of Dadeland’s business developments. The district court dismissed

BIRCH, Circuit Judge: This case returns to us for disposition from the Supreme Court of Florida, to which we certified five questions of Florida state law. See Dadeland Depot, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co., 383 F.3d 1273 (11th Cir.2004). Based on the Florida Supreme Court’s responses to those questions, see Dadeland Depot, Inc. v. St. Paul

BIRCH, Circuit Judge: Upon review of the defendants’ timely petition for rehearing, requesting that we reconsider that portion of our opinion granting the plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees incident to this appeal, we agree that Dade-land is not yet entitled to attorneys’ fees under the applicable Florida statute. Accordingly, we vacate that portion of our opinion, see </

99 F.Supp.2d 787 (2000) PHILLIPS PETROLEUM CO., et al. v. AIG TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., et al. No. Civ.A. G-00-133. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Galveston Division. May 26, 2000. *788 Ronald D. Krist, Krist Weller et al., Houston, TX, Robert H. Shulman, Howrey Simon et al., Washington, DC, for Phillips Petroleum Comp