⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

4 opinions for “Veronica M Almaraz”

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-01-30 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-12-00578-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007-02-08 · Published · cited 320× · 916 A.2d 257; 397 Md. 108; 62 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 8; 2007 Md. LEXIS 78
916 A.2d 257 (2007) 397 Md. 108 Timothy and Bernadette LLOYD, et al. v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, et al. No. 10, Sept. Term, 2002. Court of Appeals of Maryland. February 8, 2007. Reconsideration Denied March 14, 2007. *261 John M. Mason (Marks & Sokolov, LLC, Philadelphia, Law Office
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-10-08 · Published · cited 0×
15-25-00153-CV ACCEPTED 15-25-00142-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS CAUSE NO. D-1-GN-25-000719 10/8/2025 3:01 PM
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012-02-09 · Published · cited 0× · 204 Md. App. 1; 40 A.3d 514; 42 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20049; 2012 WL 426748; 2012 Md. App. LEXIS 16
PER CURIAM. In accordance with Md.Code (1973, 2006 ReplVol.), Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article, § l-403(c), a majority of the incumbent judges of this Court ordered this appeal from the Circuit Court for Baltimore County by appellant Exxon Mobil Corporation to be reheard in banc. The in banc panel unanimously concludes: that counsel for Exxon Mobil did not waive the appellant’s right to challenge