Cases

OPINION GOULD, Circuit Judge: Defendants-Appellants Sweetwater Union High School District and eight of its administrators and board members (collectively “Sweetwater”) appeal the district court’s grant of declaratory and injunctive relief to Plaintiffs-Appellees Veronica Ollier, Naudia Rangel, Maritza Rangel, Amanda Hernandez, and Arianna Hernandez (collective

234 P.3d 912 (2010) GREAT BASIN WATER NETWORK, a Nonprofit Organization; Defenders of Wildlife, a Nonprofit Corporation; Edgar Alder; Clark W. Miles; Raymond E. Timm; Theodore Stazeski; Sheldon M. Edwards; Kathryn Hill; Kenneth F. Hill; Scotty Heer; Beth B. Anderson; Susan L. Geary; Donald W. Geary; Robert Ewing; Pamela Jensen; Bruce Jensen; Renee A. Alder; Robert J. Nickerson; Joyce B. Nickerson; Edward J. Weisbrot; Alexander Rose, Executive Director of

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-1241 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Veronica Gonzalez-Carmona, also known as Cinthia Selene Ramirez Barba, also

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA PUBLISHED Present: Judges Friedman, Chaney and Raphael Argued by videoconference DANNETTE VERONICA PERKINS OPINION BY v. Record No. 0241-24-4 JUDGE VERNIDA R. CHANEY APRIL 22, 2025

Opinion on Rehearing issued December 28, 2021 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-19-00296-CV ——————————— HECTOR CORTEZ, Appellant V. VERONICA GARZA CORTEZ

' RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge: Veronica Lemus Contreras (Lemus), a native and citizen of Mexico residing in the United States, challenges the denial of her grave-risk defense to Alberto Ontiveros Soto’s (Ontiveros) seeking return of their chiíd, A.O.L., to Mexico pursuant, to the Hague Convention on the. Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (Hague Convention

Opinion issued December 29, 2020 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-19-00296-CV ——————————— HECTOR CORTEZ, Appellant V. VERONICA GARZA CORTEZ, Appelle

Affirm and Opinion Filed January 13, 2022 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00517-CV IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF MALCOLM GREGORY JOHNSON AND VERONICA POWELL-JOHNSON On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-19-

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-19-00232-CV ___________________________ RYAN EUGENE RAY, Appellant V. VERONICA FIKES, Appellee On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019-001057-2 Before Gabriel, Birdwell, and Womack, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Gabriel

§ DANBILL PARTNERS, L.P., No. 08-19-00139-CV § Appellant, Appeal from the § v. 448th District Court

OPINION HARVEY BROWN, Justice. This is the fourth appeal arising out of two lawsuits regarding court reporter fees. In the first lawsuit filed in justice court, Houston Reporting Services (HRS) alleged that Veronica Davis, an attorney, breached her contractual obligation to pay for deposition transcripts. HRS obtained a post-answer default judgment against

OPINION McKEOWN, Circuit Judge: Bank fees, like taxes, are ubiquitous. And, like taxes, bank fees are unlikely to go away any time soon. The question we *716 consider here is the extent to which overdraft fees imposed by a national bank are subject to state regulation.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE July 6, 2010 Session JULIE-CRISTIE (BARONE) NEAL v. VERONICA MONDE BARONE, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Cumberland County No. 9302-4-05 Amy Hollars, Special Judge ______________________________ No. E2009-02598-COA-R9-CV - FILED OCTOBER 13, 2010

OPINION *Page 3 {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Veronica Blake, appeals from a Columbiana County Municipal Court decision awarding judgment in favor of plaintiff-appellee, the New England Square Condominium Association, in the amount of $2,759.37 on appellee's claim for unpaid condominium fees and insurance fees. Appellant also appeals from a judgment denying her request to amend her count

222 P.3d 665 (2010) GREAT BASIN WATER NETWORK, A Nonprofit Organization; Defenders of Wildlife, A Nonprofit Corporation; Edgar Alder; Clark W. Miles; Raymond E. Timm; Theodore Stazeski; Sheldon M. Edwards; Kathryn Hill; Kenneth F. Hill; Scotty Heer; Beth B. Anderson; Susan L. Geary; Donald W. Geary; Robert Ewing; Pamela Jensen; Bruce Jensen; Renee A. Alder; Robert J. Nickerson; Joyce B. Nickerson; Edward J. Weisbrot; Alexander Rose, Executive Director of

*894 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW JAMES E. MASSEY, Bankruptcy Judge. In this adversary proceeding Plaintiff Veronica Giles asserts that Defendant James B. Nutter & Co. (“Nutter”) violated the discharge injunction imposed by 11 U.S.C. § 524 giving rise to a claim for damages, punitive damages, and attorney’s fees. She further

Motions for En Banc Reconsideration Denied as Moot; Opinion of December 28, 2018 Withdrawn; Affirmed as Modified in Part, Reversed and Rendered in Part, Reversed and Remanded in Part, and Substitute Opinion Filed April 2, 2019. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-16-00962-CV JANG WON CHO, Appellant V. KUN SIK KIM AND VERONICA YOUNG LE

Affirmed as Modified in Part, Reversed and Rendered in Part, Reversed and Remanded in Part, and Opinion Filed December 28, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-16-00962-CV JANG WON CHO, Appellant V. KUN SIK KIM AND VERONICA YOUNG LEE, LEGAL HEIR TO PATRICK HIY CHANG LEE, Appellees

*974OPINION OF THE COURT Randall T. Eng, J. In a matter of first impression arising from a local Grand Jury investigation into purported Medicare fraud by a Queens County orthopedic surgeon, this court today holds that State and Federal public policy and the statutory framework underlying the Federally funded Medicare program require that an exception

OPINION OF THE COURT Randall T. Eng, J. In an apparent case of first impression, the court is faced with the following issue: May the actions of a prosecutor in instructing the members of a Grand Jury to disregard previ*243ously received exculpatory evidence form the basis for a motion to dismiss an indictment, pursuant to CPL 210.35 (5), on the gr