Cases

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-71,017-01

282 F.3d 74 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.George RIVERA, Ward Johnson, Luis Gautier, Ralph Hernandez, Jamie Cuevas, Victor Briggs, Anthony Briggs, Willie Claussen, Kenroy Prentice, George Vasquez, Elizabeth Velasquez, Desiree Sidberry, Ketty Turino, Andrew Simmons, Ruben Rodriquez, John Marrero, Vicki Dowdy, Madeline Rodriquez, Mark Sanchez, Albert Delmoral, Edgardo Delmoral, Anthony Garay, Veronica Aviles, Matthew Williams, Jonathan

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Sunshine, J.), dated April 23, 2013, which, after a hearing, granted the plaintiffs motion for an order of protection. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. We agree with the defendant that his appeal from the order a

PER CURIAM. Defendant-appellant Walter David Cook has petitioned this court for rehearing based on our summary order of June 21, 2000 affirming Cook’s conviction and sentence. We deny the petition, but write to explain why Cook’s sentence was not unconstitutional under the Supreme Court’s decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), which was decided after our order had i

971 F.2d 876 36 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 554 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.George RIVERA, Ward Johnson, Walter David Cook, LuisGautier, Ralph Hernandez, Jaime Cuevas, Victor Briggs,Anthony Briggs, Willie Claussen, Kenroy Prentice, Bob Lemon,John Doe, Elizabeth Velasquez, Desiree Sidberry, KettyTurino, Andrew Simmons, Ruben Rodriguez, John Marrero,Raymond Marrero, Vickie Dowdy, Madeline Rodr

J. DANIEL MAHONEY, Circuit Judge: Defendants-appellants George Rivera (also known as “Boy George”), Ketty Turi-no (“K. Turino”), Vickie Dowdy, Anthony Garay, Danny Delgado, Arycelis Turino (“A. Turino”), and Anthony Cruz appeal from judgments of conviction for engaging in a conspiracy to distribute heroin and (in the case of Rivera) attempted income tax evasion entered, after a jury trial, in the United States District Court

Pantoja v Rosario 2026 NY Slip Op 04377 July 9, 2026 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. Rafael M. Pantoja, Plaintiff-Appellant, v Albert L. Rosario, et al., Defendants-Respondents. In the Matter of R

OPINION Opinion by Justice RODRIGUEZ. 1 By petition for writ of mandamus, First Mercury Insurance Company (“First Mercury”) contends that the trial court abused its discretion by denying First Mercury’s plea to the jurisdiction because, in Texas, an injured party generally cannot sue

[Cite as State v. Smith, 2023-Ohio-4800.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 23AP-146 v. : (C.P.C. No. 15CR-4092) James E. Smith, Jr., : (REGULAR CALENDA

OPINION Opinion by: KAREN ANGELINI, Justice. At issue in this appeal is whether the warrantless blood draw administered to Daniel James Weems violated his rights under the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution. Because we hold that Weems’s rights under the Fourth Amendment were violated, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand for a new tria

SADLER, J. {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, James E. Smith, Jr., appeals from the judgment entry of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas finding appellant guilty of two counts of possession of cocaine and two counts of trafficking in cocaine. For the following reasons, we affirm the decision of the trial court. I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY <

ORDER RE EVANS FRUIT CO., INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, INTER ALIA LONNY R. SUKO, District Judge. BEFORE THE COURT is Evans Fruit Co., Inc.’s Motion For Summary Judgment (ECF No. 568) and Plaintiff EEOC’s Motion For Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 549). These motions were heard with oral argument on May 17, 2012. BACKGROUND EEOC asks the court to fi

Opinion issued January 28, 2025. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00041-CR ——————————— LAWERANCE WHITE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

OPINION Opinion by: Marialyn Barnard, Justice A jury convicted appellant Donald F. Huff of felony murder — the underlying offense was driving while intoxicated, third offense, and the trial court sentenced Huff to forty-five years’ confinement. On appeal, Huff raises four issues, contending: (1) the evidence is insufficient to support his

70 F.Supp.2d 758 (1999) Felipe ELIZONDO, Olivia Elizondo, Angel Elizondo, Marlen Elizondo, Nancy Elizondo, Karina Elizondo, Sarai Elizondo, Veronica Nino and Juan Nieto, Plaintiffs, v. Floyd Joseph PODGORNIAK and Ronald John Podgorniak, individually and d/b/a Podgorniak Farms, Defendants. No. 98-10235. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Northern Division. August 30, 1

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1582 JIHAD ADBUL-MUMIT; MATTHEW ABEDI; MONICA ADAIR SARGENT; MARK AGEE; ALIZ AGOSTON; YVONNE ALSTON; DAN AMATRUDA; KRISTY AMBROSE; KIMBERLEY AMICK; WANDA G. AMOS; CHRISTOPHER ARAUZA; CARL ARSENAULT; BROOKE ASHER; MICHELLE ATKINS; RAYMOND O. ATKINS; MATTHEW ATWELL; DAVID AUB; SOHA AYYASH; ASIF AZIZ; SUSAN BAILEY; KAREN BAKER; HAB BA

Opinion issued May 28, 2026 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00388-CR ——————————— JOSE ANGEL RENTERIA GARCIA, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

PD-0763-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 7/7/2015 4:21:21 PM Accepted 7/9/2015 3:36:55 P

17-2208, 18-359 Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2018 (Argued: February 13, 2019 Decided: April 1, 2020) Nos. 17-2208-cv, 18-359-cv MAXCIMO SCOTT, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, JAY FRANCIS ENSOR, CHRISTIN

(2008) In re CARIBBEAN PETROLEUM, LP., Debtors. Civil No. 04-1964 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. June 20, 2008. OPINION AND ORDER FOLLOWING BENCH TRIAL BESOSA, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs are 263 residents of Cabrera Development in Utuado; the development borders the Rio Grande de Arecibo. On July