Cases

497 F.3d 272 (2007) Henry WASHINGTON v. Superintendent Edward KLEM; Deputy Supt. Joseph Piazza; John Mack, Programs Coordinator; Sgt. Dougherty, Property Room Supervisor Henry Unseld Washington, Appellant. No. 05-2351. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued April 10, 2007. Filed: August 2, 2007. *273<

270 F.Supp.2d 1163 (2003) ELSINORE CHRISTIAN CENTER, a California non-profit corporation, and Gary Holmes, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, a California corporation, et al., Defendants. No. CV 01-04842 SVW(RCX). United States District Court, CD. California. June 24, 2003. *1165 Brad W Dacus, Citrus Heights, CA, Derek L Gauba

ACCEPTED 04-14-00807-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 6/19/2015 3:55:18

291 F.Supp.2d 1083 (2003) ELSINORE CHRISTIAN CENTER, a California non-profit corporation, and Gary Holmes, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, a California corporation, et al., Defendants. No. CV 01-04842 SVW (RCX). United States District Court, C.D. California. August 21, 2003. *1084 Brad W. Dacus, Citrus Heights, CA, Roman St

ACCEPTED 03-14-00667-CV 3957344 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH DEC 13 2004 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS PATRICK FISHER Clerk

Because I believe the trial judge did not err in refusing to instruct the jury as requested by the defendant, I must respectfully dissent. Punishing a defendant for unintentionally causing the death of another while in the commission of a misdemeanor is not a new legal concept, in either a criminal case or a civil case. For example, in Pippin v. State,19 Ala. App. 384, 387, 97 So. 615<

Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc

Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc

HARRISON L. WINTER, Chief Judge. This appeal challenges the final power marketing policy of the Southeastern Power Administration (SEPA), a federal power marketing agency within the Department of Energy. Plaintiffs, various municipally-owned electric systems in North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia, along with the Cities of Bennettsville and Camden, South Carolina (collectively referred to herein as “Electricities”),

774 F.2d 1262 ELECTRICITIES OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.; Virginia MunicipalElectric Association No. 1, and the cities ofBennettsville and Camden, SouthCarolina, Appellants,v.The SOUTHEASTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION; Harry C. Geisinger,in his capacity as Administrator; The Department of Energy,and Donald P. Hodel, in his capacity as Secretary of Energy;Cities of Dothan, Opelika, Troy, Alexander City, Fairhope,Lanett,

499 F.Supp. 980 (1980) Shirley WILDER, Thomas Edwards, and Sharon Rodwell, and Barry Parker, by his mother and next friend, Madeline Butler; Robin Herbert, by her mother and next friend, Nancy Herbert; Shedrick Roberts, by his mother and next friend, Annie Roberts; and Christopher Torian, by his mother and next friend, Lillian Torian, on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and Dr. Kenneth Clark; Rev. Howard Mo

MACK, Associate Judge: In the District of Columbia, the Human Rights Act prohibits an educational institution from discriminating against any individual on the basis of his or her sexual orientation.1 Two student gay rights groups contend that Georgetown University violated this statutory command by refusing to grant them “University Recognition” together with equal access to the additional facilit

TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge. On May 31, 1921, and following into the next day, violent attacks destroyed the African-American community of Greenwood, Oklahoma. An angry white mob converged on Greenwood in a devastating assault, burning homes and businesses, killing up to three hundred people, and leaving thousands homeless. In February 2003, Plaintiffs-Appellants, all Riot survivors or descendants of survivors, filed suit a

The opinion of the Court was delivered by POLLOCK, J. This appeal presents the question of the validity under the New Jersey Constitution of a statute that prohibits Medicaid funding for abortions “except where it is medically indicated to be necessary to preserve the woman’s life.” N.J.S.A. 30:4D-6.1 (1981). Medicaid pays for the costs of all childbirths' and abortions to save the life of the mothe

439 Mich. 650 (1992) 487 N.W.2d 166 DOE v. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES Docket Nos. 91092, 91093, (Calendar No. 12). Supreme Court of Michigan. Argued November 7, 1991. Decided June 9, 1992. *655 Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Gay Secor Hardy, Solicitor General, and J

374 U.S. 203 (1963) SCHOOL DISTRICT OF ABINGTON TOWNSHIP, PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL. v. SCHEMPP ET AL. No. 142. Supreme Court of United States. Argued February 27-28, 1963. Decided June 17, 1963.[*] APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. John D. Killian III, Deputy Attorney General of Penns

LUCERO, Circuit Judge, dissenting, with whom SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge, joins. No case in my tenure on the court could be more compellingly described as meeting the Rule 35 en banc standard of presenting a “question of exceptional importance” deserving the attention of the entire court than this. In one of the more shameful events in our nation’s history, over two hundred African-Americans were slaughtered and a