Cases

750 F.Supp.2d 70 (2011) Oscar SALAZAR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 93-452(GK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. January 4, 2011. April Isabel Land, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, Bruce J. Terris, Kathleen Lillian Millian, Elisabeth J. Lyons, Terris, Pravlik & Millian, LLP, Paula

OPINION Epstein, J. This is a contractors three-piece claim for $17,710.99 of additional compensation for FY1988 road-patching work under a competitively-bid contract with the Department of Transportation (“IDOT”). This 1990 claim over a 1988 dispute was tried to our Commissioner in 1991 and is finally before the full court on the pleadings, the trial record and the Com

Justice Blackmun, with whom Justice Brennan, Justice Marshall, and Justice O’Connor join, concurring in part and dissenting in part. Some might well regard the Court’s decision in this case as an affront to the nations that have joined the United States in ratifying the Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence *548Abroa

ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court Eastern Savings Bank, FSB v. Flores, 2012 IL App (1st) 112979 Appellate Court EASTERN SAVINGS BANK, FSB, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SUSAN Caption FLORES, Defendant-Appellant (Edward Flores, Defendant). District & No. First District, Fifth Division Docket No. 1-11-2979 Filed

141 B.R. 878 (1992) In re Robert B. HARMAN, Leanna J. Harman a/k/a Leanna J. Hohannes, Debtors. Bankruptcy No. 91-15053S. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. July 2, 1992. *879 *880 Michael Temin, Liza B. Leidner, Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen, Philadelphia, Pa., for debtor. <

PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court for the District of Colorado denying a motion to vacate a judgment of forfeiture of a bail bond. Appellants were sureties on a bond guaranteeing the appearance of defendant Clemente Marquez. The bond was executed on September 14, 1974 and defendant subsequently appeared for trial and was convicted. The bond was ordered

HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge. This appeal follows dismissal of a civil rights action challenging the constitutionality of a Kansas amended regulation governing correspondence, legal materials, assistance and preparation of legal papers in penal institutions. Appellant McCarty alleged that the regulation denies equal protection and due pr

Filed 12/21/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (El Dorado) ---- CITY OF ROCKLIN, C091172 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. PC20190309) v. LEGACY FAMILY ADVENTURES-RO

*297 BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge: This appeal represents the final phase of what has been protracted and difficult litigation for both sides. Plaintiffs allege that the civilian employee promotion system used at Kelly Air Force Base has operated to discriminate against Hispanic males. After a prolonged disco

TORRUELLA, Chief Judge. Before the Court is a challenge to regulations promulgated by the Attorney General of Massachusetts which restrict the sale, promotion, and labeling of tobacco products in an effort to reduce the use of such products by minors. Three groups of tobacco companies 1 have sued the Attor

427 B.R. 364 (2010) In re FIELDSTONE MORTGAGE CO., Debtor. No. 07-21814-JS. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland. March 22, 2010. *367 Joel I. Sher, Daniel J. Zeller, Shapiro Sher Guinot & Sandler, Baltimore, MD, for Debtor. J. Daniel Vorsteg, Chad Toms, Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, Baltimore, MD, for FMC Plan Trust

172 B.R. 829 (1994) In re NATIONAL ENTERPRISES, INC., Debtor. NATIONAL ENTERPRISES, INC. Liquidating Trust, Plaintiff, v. ASSOCIATES LEASING, INC., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 90-33935-RS. Adv. No. 93-3032-RS. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia. August 17, 1994. *830 *831 Andrew J

ORDER SCHREIER, Chief Judge. Plaintiffs, Daniel Pucket, Amy Pucket, Luke Pucket, and Benjamin Pucket (collectively referred to as plaintiffs), filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants Hot Springs School District and its School Board (collectively referred to as School District) alleging that School District’s refusal to bus children to Bethesda Lutheran School violates the First and Fourteen

76 F.Supp.2d 124 (1999) LORILLARD TOBACCO CO., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Philip Morris Inc., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., and United States Tobacco Co., Plaintiffs, v. Thomas REILLY, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Massachusetts, Defendant. No. Civ.A. 99-11118-WGY. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. December 2, 1999.

CYR, Circuit Judge. Olga Capo Roman (“Capo”), former vice president of appellee La Electrónica, Inc. (hereinafter: “Electrónica” or “chapter 11 debtor”), appeals the district court’s reversal of a bankruptcy court order according “administrative expense” priority to certain alimony and support obligations due Capo by her former husband, Reinaldo Betancourt Veraits (“Betancourt”)

USCA1 Opinion UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 92-2369 IN RE LA ELECTRONICA, INC., Debtor

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT No. 92-2369 IN RE LA ELECTRONICA, INC., Debtor LA ELECTRONICA, INC., Appellee, v. OLGA CAPO-ROMAN, Appellant.

138 B.R. 641 (1992) In re Barton FLEISHMAN, Debtor. In re Gerald B. OTTINGER, Debtor. Bankruptcy Nos. 91-13707-JNG, 91-13708-JNG. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Massachusetts. April 8, 1992. Daniel M. Glosband, Goodwin, Procter & Hoar, Boston, Mass., for objecting party. William G. Billingham, Marshfield, Mass., Chapter 7 Trustee. Gary W. Cruicks

CARDINE, Justice. Gerry Spence, appellant, undertook to represent Andrea Dworkin in her litigation against Hustler Magazine (Hustler). Because he undertook to represent this client, he was personally attacked by Hustler by being named “Asshole of the Month.” Spence is a lawyer. Lawyers named “Asshole of the Month,” such as Spence, are “vermin-infested turd dispensers,” “parasitic scum-suckers,” “shameless shitholes

STAHL, Circuit Judge. This appeal implicates the constitutionality of a Massachusetts statute requiring manufacturers of tobacco products to disclose the additives and nicotine-yield ratings of then-products to the state’s public health department. See Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 94, § 307B (the “Disclosure Act”). Plaintiffs-appellants, various manufacturers of cigaret