Cases

159 Ariz. 237 (1988) 766 P.2d 110 STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Armando VERA, Appellant. No. 1 CA-CR 12022. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B. October 13, 1988. Review Denied January 24, 1989. Robert K. Corbin, Atty. Gen. by William J. Schafer III, Chief Counsel, Crim. Div., and Barbara A. Jarrett, Asst.

131 Ariz. 182 (1981) 639 P.2d 372 Ned DALEY and Velma Daley, his wife, Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. M.P. EARVEN and Mary Alice Earven, his wife, Defendants/Appellants. No. 2 CA-CIV 3932. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2. December 3, 1981. Rehearing Denied January 11, 1982. Review Denied February 23, 1982.

OAKES, Circuit Judge: W.W.W. Pharmaceutical Co., Inc. (“WWW”) appeals from a judgment as a matter of law granted to defendant-appel-lee Gillette Co. (“Gillette”). WWW sued Gillette under the Lanham Act for trademark infringement, 15 U.S.C. § 1114 (1988), and false designation of origin, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) (1988). WWW also made pendant claims of unfair competition under New York c

332 A.2d 797 (1975) Arthur W. GREY v. Charles D. KONRAD and Vera Konrad. No. 76-74. Supreme Court of Vermont. February 4, 1975. *798 Jeff Taylor, Rutland, for plaintiff. Carbine & Liccardi, Rutland, for defendants. Before BARNEY, C. J., and SMITH, KEYSER, DALEY and LARROW, JJ. KEYSER, Justice. Plai

323 F.Supp.2d 429 (2004) NATURE'S BEST, INC., Plaintiff, v. ULTIMATE NUTRITION, INC., Defendant. No. CV-04-1541 (TCP)(MLO). United States District Court, E.D. New York. June 30, 2004. *430 Albert Robin, Robin, Blecker & Daley, New York City, for Plaintiff. Charles H. Knull, Ullman, Shapiro & Ullman LLP, New York Ci

ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. In this lawsuit, plaintiffs Sue Lowery (the widow of Thomas Lowery and the executrix of his estate) and Wendy Daley (decedent Lowery’s daughter) have brought claims for fraud, misrepresentation, civil conspiracy, wrongful death, and breach of contract, and a claim under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (commonly known as RICO), 18 U

235 F.3d 244 (6th Cir. 2000) Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff-Appellant (98-3986), George D. Edwards; Kenneth Jackson; Melvin L. Sealey; Alvin Woodford; Vera Hamilton; Charles Young; David Stewart; Harland Jones; Robin Hardwick; Monty Rates; Rudolph Gillen; James Garner, and all others similarly situated, Intervening Plaintiffs-Appellants (98-3935),v.United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pi

53.*43‘4‘0\ )03:°3/'0'"4 RECE|VED IN couRT oF chMmAL APPEALS _sz 08 2015 , AbelAco. w CLEM com mg ®ua:rm= C:O.hunvm_ Arwmw a ’S”‘ MSEL .,DMSTA ’\_1.€-: Q€®L'\E;\;T 'FoQ C!>\.)FHZMAT'JD»L) oF b€Lu/E/L\/ m= A-Pru(\,+mwf Fc`:)z wrlli`o»= Hmms corams..- Mc \ RQQ&?\C\ Cu'w,§nthgs `> Enc\bsea\ phasedth a (Q.sp¢c:\'p\¢\ cequns+‘ \wc»ulol luke “\.~ i “Q\'\.Q w\\)\. '\"\9, Cw.(~\' anew C\~u€m()¥r" "\) ~\'MLSCL¥\L\\D\M¢LQP“ made%\) m w&lol> UUUNLI{ § "D'\STQ»\QT QLE{L\( , ` ` ' ‘\’Lz;

839 S.W.2d 214 (1992) 310 Ark. 639 In the Matter of the ESTATE OF Charlye Vera Forrester DAVIDSON, Deceased. No. 91-326. Supreme Court of Arkansas. October 19, 1992. *215 Kay L. Matthews and James L. Sloan, Little Rock, for appellant. P.H. Hardin, Fort Smith, for appellee. BROWN, Justice. This

283 F.Supp.2d 883 (2003) Bruce E. KATZ and Bruce E. Katz, M.D., P.C., d/b/a Juva Skin & Laser Center/Medispa Plaintiffs, v. Michael MODIRI, Juvenex Manhattan, Inc., and Juvenex Ltd., Defendants. No. 02 Civ. 7870(RLE). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 8, 2003. *884 *885

15 F.Supp.2d 252 (1998) AZTAR CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. NY ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, d.b.a. Big Apple Casino Cruises, Jubilee of the Bahamas, Inc., a Bahamian Corporation, and Fred Collins, Jr., Defendants. No. 97-CV-3674. United States District Court, E.D. New York. July 29, 1998. *253 Albert Robin, Robin, Blecker, Daley & Drisco

808 F.Supp. 1013 (1992) W.W.W. PHARMACEUTICAL CO., INC., Plaintiff, v. The GILLETTE COMPANY, Defendant. No. 89 Civ. 1942 (CBM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. May 21, 1992. Opinion on Motion to Amend Judgment July 14, 1992. *1014 *1015 John M. Keene, Graham, Camp

OPINION SUSAN LARSEN, Justice. E.J.G.P. appeals the juvenile court’s disposition order, finding that she had engaged in delinquent conduct. The court placed E.J.G.P. on electronic monitor probation and ordered her to perform 200 hours of community service. For the reasons stated below, we affirm. PACTS At the adjudication hearing on June 3, 199

KEITH, Circuit Judge, concurring. Although I agree that the district court’s opinion should be affirmed, I write separately to note my disagreement with the application of the law-of-the-case doctrine to reach this result. The law-of-the-case doctrine “expresses the practice of the courts generally to refuse to reopen what has been decided.” Christianson v. Colt Indus. Operating Corp., 486 U.S. 800, 817,

997 P.2d 472 (2000) Victor ARYCHUK; Lillie Arychuk; Richard Asay; Dorothy Asay; Fritz Ashauer; Carolyn Ashauer; Robert Barngrover; Jean Barngrover; Ronald Bergener; Donna Bergener; Ronald Boulter; Richard Clark; Joleen Clark; Neal Colley; Judy Colley; John Coykendall; Fred Cobb; John Clay; John Cullitan; William Daley; Stanley Dennison; Anna Dennison; Donn Dunnigan; Donna Dunnigan; Karen Drennon; Richard Ellinghysen; Carolyn Ellinghysen; Colin Fay; Evely

850 F.Supp. 232 (1994) SCHIEFFELIN & CO., Plaintiff, v. The JACK COMPANY OF BOCA, INC., and John P. Calderaio, individually and doing business as The Jack Co., Inc., Defendants. No. 89 Civ. 2941 (BN). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 31, 1994. *233 *234

*476 JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge: The question presented is whether there is a likelihood of confusion when two manufacturers use the same mark in the sale of soft drinks, but one uses the mark primarily as a brand label, and the other uses it as a trade name in the distribution of soft drinks to reta

176 Ill. App.3d 18 (1988) 530 N.E.2d 1015 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ODELL HUDDLESTON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 86-1486. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (3rd Division). Opinion filed October 19, 1988. *19 Paul P. Biebel, Jr., Public Defender, of Chicago (Dennis E.

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. The current license status of a Pennsylvania attorney can be found on the Disciplinary Board’s website. https://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/for-the- public/find-attorney Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Attorneys Certified for Administrative Suspensi

MEMORANDUM & ORDER PAMELA K. CHEN, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Eddy Reyes (“Plaintiff’) filed this action on October 9, 2013, alleging violations of the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq., and the New York City Human Rights Law (“NYCHRL”), N.Y.C. Admin. Code. § 8-107. (Dkt. 1.) According to Plaintiff, after taking leave under the FMLA, he was not permi