Cases

USCA11 Case: 23-12737 Document: 74-1 Date Filed: 11/04/2025 Page: 1 of 83 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-12737 ____________________ YIFAN SHEN, ZHIMING XU,

ACCEPTED 01-15-00989-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/3/2015 1:47:58 PM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SALESIAN SOCIETY, PROVINCE OF ST. PHILIP THE APOSTLE, INC., et al., Plaintiff, v. Civ. Action No. 18-0477 (EGS) ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, 1 et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Pursuant to the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), special immigrant visas are

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Derrick K. Watson, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Professional athletes mirror the federal government in this respect: they operate within a set of rules, and when one among them forsakes those rules in favor of his own, problems ensue. And so it goes wi

THEODORE D. CHUANG, United States District Judge In 2017, President Donald J. Trump issued two Executive Orders temporarily *654banning the entry into the United States, with some exceptions, of nationals of multiple predominantly Muslim nations. These orders were followed by a Presidential Proclamation which extended the ban indefinitely as

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NATIONAL TPS ALLIANCE; No. 25-2120 MARIELA GONZALEZ; FREDDY D.C. No. ARAPE RIVAS; M.H.; CECILIA 3:25-cv-01766- GONZALEZ HERRERA; ALBA EMC PURICA HERNANDEZ; E. R.; HENDRINA VIVAS CASTILLO; VILES DORSAINVIL; A.C.A.; SHERIKA BLANC,

THACKER, Circuit Judge, concurring: I concur in the majority’s opinion but write separately for three reasons: (1) I would not consider remarks made by candidate Trump before he took his presidential oath of office; (2) I would nonetheless find that Appellees have demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits of their argument that Section 2(c) of the Second Executive Order (“EO-2”) violates the

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2017 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

MEMORANDUM OPINION THEODORE D. CHUANG, United States District Judge For the third time this year, President Donald J. Trump has issued an order banning the entry into the United States, with some exceptions, of nationals of multiple predominantly Muslim nations. At issue is whether this latest travel, ban should be enjoined by this Court because'it is the latest incarnatio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS, et al., Case No. 25-cv-872 (JMC) Plaintiffs, v. KRISTI NOEM, in her official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, et al.,

WYNN, Circuit Judge, concurring: I concur fully in the majority opinion's analysis and conclusion that the Proclamation's indefinite suspension of entry of nationals from eight countries, six of which are predominantly Muslim, likely violates the Establishment Clause. I also concur fully in the majority opinion's conclusion that Plaintiffs have standing to assert their constitutional claim, that Plaintiffs' constitutional cla

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1351 INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, a project of the Urban Justice Center, Inc., on behalf of itself and its clients; HIAS, INC., on behalf of itself and its clients; MIDDLE EAST STUDIES ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., on behalf of itself and its members; MUHAMMED MET

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2231 INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, a project of the Urban Justice Center, Inc., on behalf of itself and its clients; HIAS, INC., on behalf of itself and its clients; JOHN DOES #1 & 3; JANE DOE #2; MIDDLE EAST STUDIES ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., on behalf of itself and its membe